aesthetic-compressed

Part III: Aesthetics

Aesthetics, etymologically rooted in the Greek word for "perceptible to the senses," traditionally refers to the study of perceptual experiences. In the realm of analytic philosophy, however, aesthetics is specifically concerned with experiences derived from artworks or beautiful objects, whether man-made or natural. The field has expanded to encompass not just perceptual experiences, but also questions pertaining to art's nature and aesthetic judgment.

Two Main Philosophical Questions

The scope of aesthetics can be broadly divided into two categories:

  1. Questions about Art

  2. Questions about Aesthetic Experience and JudgmentThese categories are interlinked since art is a primary source of aesthetic experiences and judgments.

Chapter 8: What is Art?

Introduction to Defining Art

Many people are intrigued by the concept of art. For some, engagement with art manifests through creating it; for others, it includes analyzing specific artworks as viewers or listeners. Philosophers often seek to define art through conditions that govern the application of the concept.

Characteristics of a Good Definition

A comprehensive definition of art would ideally provide both necessary and sufficient conditions for what constitutes art. Necessary conditions are those that any artwork must meet to be considered art, while sufficient conditions ensure that if met, qualify an object as art. Philosophers aim to create definitions in alignment with current art-critical practices, cautioning against overly restrictive stipulations that exclude widely accepted artworks.

The Diversity of Existing Artworks

The task of defining art is complicated by the vast diversity of objects accepted as artworks by experts. Traditional categories such as painting, sculpture, architecture, music, and poetry showcase significant differences in sensory properties. Notably, developments in the 20th century, including new art forms, have further challenged these definitions.

The Challenge of New Art Forms

The explosion of new art styles—such as photography, performance art, and conceptual pieces—questions our assumptions and complicates the pursuit of a universal definition. Avant-garde movements often purposefully aim to defy prior artistic conventions, resulting in a diverse array of creations that resist simplistic categorization.

Investigating Non-Manifest Properties

With the realization that manifest properties may not suffice, philosophers are now exploring non-manifest properties—those that are not immediately perceptible. Such properties often pertain to an artwork's relational aspects, focusing on functions and procedural attributes that give meaning to an artwork beyond mere physical attributes.

Functional Definitions of Art

Functional definitions identify that which provides a specific aesthetic experience or achieves a designated function. However, the variability of art makes it challenging to find universally applicable functions.

Procedural Definitions of Art

George Dickie's institutional definition posits that an artwork is an artifact conferred with the status of being a candidate for appreciation by someone acting on behalf of the art institution. This highlights the complex social structures surrounding art while raising questions about the nature of the art world as an institution due to its lack of clear organization.

Anti-Essentialism

Some philosophers argue against the feasibility of a universal definition of art. They propose that definitions should capture the genuine reasons behind why certain objects are recognized as artworks, rather than merely noting the classification process. This approach, often termed anti-essentialism, suggests that art does not adhere to fixed necessary or sufficient conditions.

Family Resemblance Concept

Morris Weitz's perspective argues that art is best considered a family resemblance concept, defined more by similarities between artworks than by a strict set of criteria. This leads to a critical exploration of the practice of categorizing new cases of art based on existing examples, revealing a dynamic, evolving understanding of what constitutes art.

Summary of Chapter Insights

The attempt to define art encompasses a wide array of philosophical perspectives and challenges. While establishing clear necessary and sufficient definitions has proven problematic due to the diversity of accepted artworks and evolving usage, contemporary debates often prioritize relational rather than manifest properties. This results in functional and procedural definitions, as well as a growing recognition of the flexibility and adaptability of the concept of art.

Study Questions

  1. Clarify the difference between necessary and sufficient conditions using everyday examples.

  2. Compile a list of various artworks across different genres. Assess their shared properties.

  3. Examine whether these artworks share specific functions useful for defining art.

  4. Reflect on whether definitions ought to account for the significant reasons why specific items are deemed artworks.

  5. Debate the necessity of accommodating all artworks recognized by experts in any definition of art.

  6. Explore whether the absence of necessary conditions discredits the existence of art altogether.

Further Reading

  • Carroll, Noel (ed.) (2000) Theories of Art Today (University of Wisconsin Press).

  • Danto, Arthur (2013) What Art Is (Yale University Press).

  • Davies, Stephen (1991) Definitions of Art (Cornell University Press).

  • Freeland, Cynthia (2002) But is it Art? (Oxford University Press).

  • Kristeller, Paul (1951) The Modern System of the Arts, Journal of the History of Ideas.