Professional Practice in Biomedical Science: Medical Microbiology and Virology Lab

Learning Outcomes and Introduction

  • Presenter: Mark McGimpsey, Biomedical Scientist, Microbiology Laboratory, Royal Group Hospitals.

  • Core Objectives:

    • Describe procedures and practices used in a virology lab for detecting and monitoring infection.

    • Compare and contrast the mechanisms of action for various diagnostic tests.

    • Explain the advantages and disadvantages associated with different testing methodologies.

    • Critically appraise the necessity for the selection and verification of tests.

Viral Disease Mechanisms

  • Cellular Entry and Replication: Viruses must enter host cells and exploit host cell functions to replicate their viral nucleic acids.

  • Cytopathic Effect (CPE): This refers to the morphological changes and host cell death resulting from viral growth within the cells.

  • Symptomatology: Symptoms often arise from the immune response triggered by the virus-induced CPE.

  • Oncogenesis: Viruses can cause a loss of control regarding host cell replication, which may result in the formation of tumors.

Specimen Types and Diagnostic Requirements

  • Respiratory Infections: Requires nasal swabs, throat swabs, or sputum.

  • Gastrointestinal (GI) Infections: Requires faeces specimens.

  • Vesicular Rashes: Requires vesicle swabs.

  • Hepatitis and AIDS: Requires clotted blood samples.

  • Central Nervous System (CNS) Infections: Requires Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF), throat swabs, or faeces.

Overview of Diagnostic Methods

  • Electron Microscopy: Rarely used in current practice.

  • Histopathology: Slides are examined by a Histopathologist for characteristic cellular appearances.

  • Virus Isolation (Culture): Historically involved cultivation in hens’ eggs, animals, or cell lines; however, this is no longer used in standard virus laboratories.

  • Serology: Currently the mainstay of viral diagnosis.

  • Molecular Methods: Increasingly widely used alongside serology.

Principles of Serological Testing

  • Definition: Serology is the detection of antibodies produced by the immune system in response to an infection.

  • Mainstay Diagnosis: It is the primary method for viral diagnosis but can also be used to detect specific antigens, such as the Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg\text{HBsAg}).

  • Immunoglobulin Dynamics:

    • Immunoglobulin M (IgM): Produced first and is short-lived. Its detection serves as an indicator of an acute infection.

    • Immunoglobulin G (IgG): Levels rise later but persist for longer periods. Detection of IgG can be sufficient for a definitive diagnosis in certain cases, such as HIV.

  • Statistics: In the year 2019-20, the virus lab conducted 257,000257,000 tests. This volume exceeded molecular testing at the time, although molecular testing increased significantly in 2020/21 due to SARS-CoV-2\text{SARS-CoV-2}.

Specific Serological Techniques

  • Agglutination Methods:

    • Haemagglutination and Particle Agglutination: Used for tests like TPHA\text{TPHA} and TPPA\text{TPPA}.

    • Mechanism: A microtitre plate is used where Red Blood Cells (RBC\text{RBC}) or particles are sensitized (coated) with an antigen (e.g., T.pallidumT. pallidum). This is mixed with diluted patient serum.

    • Positive Result: If antibodies are present, they agglutinate the particles, which spread out and cover the bottom of the well uniformly.

    • Negative Result: Particles concentrate in a tight, visible "button" at the bottom of the well.

  • Complement Fixation (CF):

    • Procedure: Patient serum is exposed to a specific antigen and a complement.

    • Mechanism: If antibodies are present, the antigen/antibody complex "fixes" (removes) the complement. Consequently, when indicator red blood cells are added, lysis will not occur.

    • Positive Reaction: Red cells are not lysed and settle into a pellet.

    • Negative Reaction: Complement remains free to lyse the red cells.

    • Wasserman Reaction: A diagnostic CF test used historically to detect antibodies to the syphilis-causing organism TreponemaTreponema.

  • Enzyme Immunoassay (ELISA):

    • Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay: Features antigens or antibodies immobilized on a microtitre plate.

    • Indirect ELISA: Antibody of interest binds to the plate; after washing, a second anti-human antibody (bound with an enzyme) is added. A substrate is introduced and hydrolyzed by the enzyme, producing a color change (e.g., yellow wells).

  • Immuno-chromogenic Assay (Lateral Flow Test):

    • Example: Urinary antigens for Strep.pneumoniaeStrep. pneumoniae.

    • Mechanism: Sample is drawn by capillary action; antigens bind to antibodies attached to colored markers. This complex binds to a specific antibody fixed at the test line, concentrating the color. A control line ensures the sample passed through correctly.

  • Immunofluorescence:

    • Fluorescent Treponemal Antibody (FTA): Specifically used for TreponemapallidumTreponema pallidum.

    • Mechanism: A slide coated with the organism is treated with patient serum. Matching antibodies bind and are visualized using a fluorescein-labeled anti-immunoglobulin under an ultra-violet (UV\text{UV}) light microscope.

  • Electrochemiluminescence (ECLIA):

    • Mechanism: A quantitative method measuring antigen or antibody based on changes in the ECLECL signal before and after an immunoreaction.

    • Equipment: Utilized by modern analysers such as the Roche Cobas e602.

Infections Detected via Serology

  • Syphilis

  • HIV

  • Hepatitis A, B, C, and E

  • Rubella

  • Measles

  • Varicella Zoster Virus (VZV\text{VZV}, causing chickenpox and shingles).

  • Current Trends: Many IgMIgM detection methods are being replaced by PCR\text{PCR} for acute diagnosis (e.g., VZV IgM\text{VZV IgM} was discontinued several years ago).

Molecular Diagnostics: Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)

  • Status: Established as the "gold standard" in virology and increasingly in microbiology.

  • History: Developed in 1983.

  • Mechanism: Detects the nucleic acid of a pathogen, regardless of whether the pathogen is alive or dead.

  • Attributes:

    • Sensitive: Amplifies tiny amounts of target nucleic acid to detectable levels.

    • Specific: Detects only the presence or absence of the specific target pathogen.

  • Amplification Mathematics:

    • Cycle 1: 21=22^1 = 2 copies.

    • Cycle 2: 22=42^2 = 4 copies.

    • Cycle 3: 23=82^3 = 8 copies.

    • Cycle 30: 2301092^{30} \approx 10^9 copies.

SARS-CoV-2 PCR Methodology

  • Sample Types: Throat/nasal swabs or sputum.

  • Biohazard Classification: Provisionally designated as a Hazard Group 3 (HG3\text{HG3}) pathogen; all samples must be processed in a safety cabinet.

  • Process:

    1. Lysis: Lysis buffer is added to release cellular nucleic acids.

    2. Reverse Transcription: Since SARS-CoV-2\text{SARS-CoV-2} is an RNA virus, reverse transcriptase converts RNA into complementary DNA (cDNA\text{cDNA}).

    3. Denaturation: cDNAcDNA is heated to 9095C90 - 95^\circ\text{C} to separate strands.

    4. Annealing: Primers bind to target sequences (envelope, nucleocapsid, or spike protein) at 55C55^\circ\text{C}.

    5. Extension: Taq polymerase enzyme extends the strand at 75C75^\circ\text{C}.

  • Real-Time PCR: Uses a probe with a fluorescent dye and a quencher. Taq polymerase cleaves the probe during extension, releasing the dye from the quencher and emitting a detectable signal.

Data Interpretation and Lab Logistics

  • Regional Virus Laboratory (RVL) Statistics:

    • February 2021: 3,6263,626 tests per week.

    • January 2022: Approximately 3,0003,000 tests per day.

  • Amplification Curves:

    • Sigmoidal Curve: Indicates a positive result.

    • Cycle Threshold (CT) Value: The point where the signal rises.

      • Low CT: High viral load.

      • High CT (>35): Questionable; a repeat sample is often requested.

      • Flat Line: Negative result.

Comparison of COVID-19 Testing Technologies

Technology Type

Product Names

Turnaround Time

Test Type

Throughput

Lateral Flow (Hand-held)

Innova, Abbot Panbio, Orient Gene

152015 - 20 mins

Swab

1 sample / device

Lateral Flow (Machine)

Roche/SD Biosensor, LumiraDX

103010 - 30 mins

Swab / Saliva

1 sample / device

RT-LAMP

Optigene / Genie HT

209020 - 90 mins

Swab & Saliva

> 2,000 / Day

Point-of-care PCR

DNA Nudge, DRW Samba

9090 mins

Swab

9 / day / device

Evaluation of the Lumira Dx Pilot

  • Analytical Performance: 836836 patients tested; 301301 compared against lab-based PCR.

  • Discrepancies: When PCR (\text{CT} < 40) was the comparator, Lumira Dx had 7 false negatives and 17 false positives.

  • Diagnostic Metrics (Adjusted):

    • Sensitivity: 85.71%85.71 \% (Note: 3 false negatives were early-stage and asymptomatic).

    • Specificity: 93.93%93.93 \%.

    • Negative Predictive Value (NPV): High (99.21%99.21 \% to 99.85%99.85 \% depending on prevalence).

  • Chief Medical Officer Guidance (Dr. Michael McBride): Lumira DX is a "rule out" test for rapid identification of negative patients. It detects the nucleocapsid protein antigen as a measure of infectiousiveness. Positive results must be confirmed by a second alternative PCR test.

PCR Sensitivity vs. Public Health Utility

  • Sensitivity Concerns: PCR can detect degraded viral signatures (RNA fragments from sub-genomic genes like E and N) for weeks after a person is no longer infectious.

  • Public Health Utility: Low-sensitivity tests (like Lateral Flow or LAMP) may be better for identifying current infectiousness by only detecting higher viral loads.

  • Clinical Utility: RT-qPCR\text{RT-qPCR} is preferred for identifying both active and historical infections within the last few weeks.

Case Study: Microbiology Discrepancy (September 2024)

  • Sample: Enteric sample.

  • Initial Findings:

    • PCR: Positive for ShigellaShigella, not detected for SalmonellaSalmonella.

    • Culture: ShigellaShigella not isolated; SalmonellaentericaSalmonella enterica spp isolated from enrichment only.

  • Investigation: Repeat PCR and culture confirmed initial results. Selenite neat culture was negative for SalmonellaSalmonella contamination. Serosep confirmed ShigellaShigella amplification was valid.

  • Final Reporting:

    • Shigella: Reported as "PCR positive" but "culture not isolated." Note: Consider false positive or low numbers/non-viable organism.

    • Salmonella: Reported as "PCR not detected" but "culture isolated from enrichment." Note: SalmonellaSalmonella was present but below the PCR detection limit.