Western Blotting
Overview of Western Blotting
Powerful technique used to detect specific proteins or their modifications in complex samples.
Samples: whole cell lysates, tissue samples, biological fluids, whole organisms, proteins from interaction assays, purified proteins.
Evolution to "Quantitative Western" methods that assess amounts of target proteins rather than just presence/absence.
Western Blot Protocol
Sample preparation and quantification.
Electrophoresis for protein separation.
Transfer proteins to a blotting membrane.
Blocking to prevent non-specific interactions.
Incubate with primary antibodies and wash.
Incubate with secondary antibodies and wash again.
Detection, imaging, and analysis.
Optimization required at each step for reliable results.
Sample Preparation
Goal: disrupt cells/tissues to release soluble proteins while avoiding degradation, modifications, or precipitation.
Key practices:
Extract proteins quickly, on ice, using buffers with appropriate pH and ionic strength.
Include protease inhibitors to prevent degradation.
Electrophoresis
Essential for protein separation based on molecular weight with high resolution.
Typically uses denaturing systems, including:
SDS-PAGE (Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis) with different buffer systems: Laemli, Bis Tris, Tris acetate.
Electrophoretic Transfer
Blotting Method: Transfer proteins from gel to solid support membranes (nitrocellulose or PVDF).
Proteins retain charge (usually negative due to SDS) and are fixed at their gel migrating positions.
Moved out of gel toward membrane by electrical force, a little bit of charge is required.
Blotting Membranes
Options include nitrocellulose and PVDF. = porous
Pore size ranges between 0.1 and 0.45 μm.
Protein binding through non-covalent bonds and hydrophobic interactions
Sensitivity depends on amount of protein on membrane and accessibility to ABs.
Blotting Types
Wet Transfer:
Gel and membrane immersed in transfer buffer
Current applied across gel toward membrane, requires cooling.
Transfer is slow but higher efficiency and quality for large proteins.
Semidry Transfer:
Faster, less buffer used, but lower efficiency especially for large proteins
Membrane in direct contact with gel and filter paper = sandwich —> placed between electrode plates. Proteins move toward membrane and anode (+)
Requires careful management (voltage and time) to avoid overheating and sample loss due to high voltage gradient.
Transfer Buffer Variations
Different buffers are formulated based on:
Type of transfer (wet or semidry), membrane type, protein molecular weight.
Most contain methanol: strips SDS from proteins to ensure efficient binding to membrane BUT shrinks pores of gel = prevents efficient transfer of large proteins
SDS: excess must be removed from gels by equilibration in transfer buffer (10-30min)
May decrease binding of protein to membrane (in particular NC not PVDF)
BUT complete stripping may prevent protein transfer to membrane, especially large proteins
Require low concentrations 0.01-0.05% SDS in transfer buffer
Common buffers:
Towbin: 25mM Tris, 192mM glycine, 10-20% methanol, pH 8.3. Wet and semi-dry
Bjerrum and Schafer-Nielsen: 48mM Tris, 39mM glycine. Semi-dry
CAPS: 10mM CAPS, pH 11, 10% methanol; used for large proteins and downstream sequencing
Dunn carbonate: 10mM NaHCO3, 3mM Na2CO3, pH 9.9, 20% methanol; may produce higher efficiency transfer and improve antibodies binding
Blocking Step
Block sites on membrane to prevent non-specific antibody binding, which can yield high background signals.
May cause decrease of specific signal by competing with AB for specific epitopes
Preliminary testing of range of blocking reagent REQUIRED to ensure low background and no loss of signal
Various reagents:
Blocking reagents = high concentration of proteins in buffers with/without detergents
Common: BSA (1-5%) —> IgG cause high background
non-fat dry milk —> not used for phosphoproteins, endogenous Biotin may interfere with biotin-streptavidin detection
commercial blocking agents.
Antibody Basics
Immunoglobulin G: AB = immunoglobulin proteins synthesized in response to foreign substance (antigen)
Primary Antibodies: Bind specifically to target proteins, produced in response to antigens.
Secondary Antibodies: Bind to primary antibodies, often labeled for detection (e.g., conjugated with enzymes or fluorescent dyes).
Always commercial. Commercially covalently bound to enzymes, fluorescent dyes, biotin
Can be cross-absorbed with immunoglobulins from species evolutionary close to primary AB to achieve minimal cross-reaction with them.
Types of antibodies:
Polyclonal: Recognize multiple epitopes on single protein, usually higher affinity, lower specificity.
Monoclonal: Specific to single epitope, higher specificity but lower affinity.
Choice of labeled antibodies:
Enzymes: alkaline phosphatase (AP) and horseradish peroxidase (HRP)
Fluorescent dyes
Biotin
IMPORTANT: labeled primary AB are sometimes used in WB to improve specificity but detection with them is less sensitive.
Detection Methods
Colorimetric Detection: Generates colored insoluble products at reaction sites (e.g., substrates for HRP and AP).
Chemiluminescence Detection: Light emitted from enzymatic reactions (conversion of substrate to product); very fast and sensitive. Good documentation, allows multiple exposures for best image wide dynamic range
Fluorescence Detection: Antibodies labeled with fluorophores; allows multiplexing but lower relative sensitivity than chemiluminescence, more expensive.
Imaging
Visible light scanners: after chemiluminescence detection and blots stained with visible light dyes.
CCD cameras:used with trans-illumination by light boxes after chromogenic/fluorescence detection
Laser and diode array scanners: highest sensitivity, resolution, linear dynamic range
Quantitative Western Blotting (QWB)
Aims to measure the amount of protein relative to a control (e.g., comparing treated vs. untreated). E.g. pull down experiment.
Requirements include:
Confirmation that signal intensity proportional to amount of loaded protein.
Proteins and loading controls quantified within linear range.
Normalizing signals against internal loading controls (e.g., housekeeping proteins).
Low variability to maintain reproducibility.
Dynamic range = range of intensities that detection instrument can measure in a single capture
Linear range = range of signal intensities recorded by detector that shows a linear relationship with amount of protein
high sensitivity without saturation is essential for a wide linear dynamic range
Normalization Techniques
Corrects for unavoidable sample-to-sample and lane-to-lane variations by comparing signals from target protein and an internal control in sample.
If no normalization: don’t know if changes in detected band intensities of target protein reflect biological change or variability in sample preparation and transfer.
Loading equal amount of protein —> not sufficient b/c loading inconsistencies and transfer variability.
Loading control requirements
Appropriate internal loading control: endogenous proteins used to indicate asmple concentration
Loading control must be unaffected by experimental conditions
Must be detected with same linear range as target
Does not interfere with target detection
Total protein as internal loading control (ILC)
Robust and reliable assessment = “golden standard”
After transfer but before blocking. Membrane is stained for protein —> proteins per sample lane are quantified and used fro normalization. Error and variability minimized due to integrated signal
Shows inconsistencies of transferring process
Housekeeping proteins as internal loading control
Assumed stable level of expression in variety of normal and treated samples. BUT some not stable in cells under different treatments.
Critical to verify expression is constant
Quantitative Analysis
- QWB results expressed as ratios (e.g., fold change and percentage change to reflect relative abundance).
Technical replicas = repeated measurements to establish degree of variability of protocol. Establish precision and reproducibility of assay.
Biological replicates = measurements of biologically independent samples to determine if experimental effect is biologically relevant.
Relative abundance as percentage change calculated as: (Fold change -1) * 100%