Week 9 The post-industrial and post-modern city

Week 9: The Post-Industrial/Post-Modern City

Introduction

  • Focused on global economic shifts and neoliberalism.

  • Instructor: Dr. Amy Y. Zhang (yueming.zhang@manchester.ac.uk)


Week 8 Recap

Modernist Ideals

  • Impact of modernist ideologies on urban environments.

  • Effects of Fordism:

    • Mass automobile ownership

    • Separation of job centers and suburban homes.

Critiques of Modernist Urban Planning

  • Ongoing challenges highlighted.


Aims of the Lecture

  • Introduce concepts of urban development post-1970s in the West:

    • Post-Fordism

    • De-industrialization

    • Neoliberalism

  • Identify neoliberal manifestations in urban settings.

  • Explore postmodernism in urban contexts and its reflection in city form and function.


Post-Fordism

Emergence Factors

  • Triggered by the 1973 oil crisis leading to increased mass production costs.

  • Rise in new information technologies.

  • Shift towards small-batch production and specialized jobs.

  • costs of oil increases which increased cost of mass production

Economic Changes

  • Development of economies of ‘scope’ and decentralization of production.

  • Focus on consumer types rather than social class.

  • Growth in service sectors (e.g., finance) and emergence of white-collar jobs.

  • Increased participation of women in the workforce.


De-Industrialization

Overview (1)

  • Impacted traditional industries:

    • Shipbuilding

    • Coal mining

    • Automobile manufacturing

  • Geographically specific:

    • Areas: West Midlands, Tyneside, Lancashire, US known as ‘Rustbelt’.

  • Examples: Significant job losses (e.g., half a million textile jobs).

Overview (2)

  • Inner-city areas severely impacted.

  • Affects specific social groups:

    • Males

    • Youth

    • Ethnic minorities

  • Variability of impact based on local industry mix (e.g., Liverpool vs. Detroit).


Impacts of De-Industrialization

  • As of 2012 in England: 60,000 hectares of vacant and derelict land/property.

  • 2010 in Germany: 128,000 hectares of disused land/property.

  • In the US, 16.7% of large cities identified as vacant.

  • vacancy is a problem


Service Sector Growth

Analysis

  • Some cities benefited significantly, yet not sufficiently to offset manufacturing losses (e.g., Glasgow – lost 38,961 jobs, gained only 2,795).

Unemployment Impacts

  • Increase in long-term and youth unemployment, showcasing regional imbalance.


Job Creation Trends (1998-2008)

Net Private Sector Job Creation in England

  • Example Cities:

    • London: +321,400

    • Birmingham: -61,400

    • Overall patterns show disparity in job creation across regions.


Service Sector: Work Patterns

Effects of De-Industrialization

  • Rise in part-time/flexible work arrangements (e.g., temp contracts, gig economy).

  • Growing importance of educational opportunities linking to employment potential.


Post-WWII Keynesian Welfare State

Economic Theory

  • John Maynard Keynes' view on consumption as a vital growth factor.

  • Advocacy for increased state spending during economic downturns to support employment through public jobs.


Transition to Neoliberalism

Ideological Shift

  • Late 1970s, critiques of Keynesian interventionism arise.

    • Focus on inflation without corresponding growth (stagflation).

  • Neoliberalism as driven by political changes (Thatcher, Reagan).


Definitions of Neoliberalism (Harvey, 2005)

Political and Economic Framework

  • Ideologically: Enhances individual entrepreneurial freedom within a framework of strong private property rights and free markets.

  • Economically: Advocates for free movement of goods, services, people, and money – creation of markets where none existed.

  • is an ideological framework and a range of economic actions and ways of organising things

Political Role

  • State’s role minimized in market intervention but crucial in creating market frameworks.


Types of Neoliberalism

Classification

  1. Roll-back Neoliberalism: Initial de-regulation and state cuts.

  2. Roll-out Neoliberalism: Reassessing state roles in regulating capitalism.

  3. Roll-with-it Neoliberalism: Adapting through crises with continuous reinvention.


Neoliberal Structural Models

Donor-Recipient Policy Model

  • Identifies the dynamics between growing and lagging regions.

Growth-Oriented Policy Model

  • Focused on restructuring objectives.


Neoliberalism: Urban Planning Restructuring

Planning Changes

  • Reduction of planning powers, emphasizing business coordination.

Example Measures

  • Enterprise zones: Tax exemptions and capital allowances.

  • Urban Development Corporations: Non-elected bodies with planning authority.


New Urban Politics

Shift from Government to Governance

  • Transition from hierarchical systems to inclusive governance involving diverse stakeholders: private sectors, NGOs, communities.

  • Increased emphasis on participative governance with shared responsibilities.


Urban Planning and Governance Challenges

Findings from Manchester Research

  • Lack of affordable housing in new city center developments (2018).

  • Developers utilize financial arguments against providing affordable units.

  • Section 106 agreements used for negotiated contributions towards affordable housing.


Inequality and Segregation in Cities

Urban Divide

  • Concentration of low-quality housing linked to wealth disparities.

  • Internal social organization vs poverty.

Community Design

  • Emergence of gated communities and spaces designed to socially exclude.


Index of Multiple Deprivation

Structure

  • 7 domains creating the Index, ranked by levels of deprivation.

Manchester Specifics (2019)

  • Manchester ranks 6th among UK local authorities, with varying deprivation ranks across wards.


Territorial Stigmatization

Definition

  • Collective negative representation of places reinforcing inequality.


Context of Urban Restructuring (1970s-1990s)

Economic Changes

  • Income and employment divergence; shift from mass production to customization.

Industrial Transformation

  • Emerging private capital; challenges to planning authority.


Transition to Postmodern City

Perspective Changes

  • Shift from modernist development to postmodern understanding, marked by fragmentation and diversity.


Key Areas of Urban Restructuring (Soja, 1996)

  1. Economic Base Restructuring: Shift from manufacturing to services and flexible production.

  2. Urban Form Restructuring: Suburban urbanization and gentrification trends.

  3. Social Structure Changes: Fragmentation and visible lifestyle disparities.

  4. Rise of the Carceral City: Increased privatization and surveillance.

  5. Urban Imagery Changes: Focus on consumption and environmental aesthetics.


Soja’s View on Los Angeles

  • Seen as a postmodern archetype with apparent accessibility but underlying disparities.

  • Representation of urban spaces as power-constructed mosaics.


The Postmodern City

Characteristics

  • Not merely a post-industrial city, reflects deep-seated rejections of modernist planning principles.

  • Urban space fragmentation and challenge to the top-down vision.


Understanding Postmodernism

  • Describes approaches based on narrative diversity and subjective realities.


Features of Postmodernism

  • Embraces multiple possibilities, promotes uncertainty and diversity, contradicting interpretations of progress.


Postmodernism’s Influence on Urban Planning

Impact Assessment

  • A significant deviation from traditional planning ideologies and practices.


Summary of Key Concepts

  1. Postmodernism as a reaction to modernism.

  2. Connection to broader trends (e.g., de-industrialization).

  3. Neoliberal ideology promoting laissez-faire capitalism and ‘business-friendly’ approaches to urban planning.


Contemporary Cities Characteristics

  • Increasingly multi-centered, fragmented, and globally interconnected.

  • Transformation of industrial landscapes and labor divisions.


Key Readings for Further Study

  • Dear, M., & Flusty, S. (1998), Postmodern urbanism.

  • Peck, J., & Tickell, A. (2002), Neoliberalizing space.