football 5.3 pt 1

Definition of Scandal

  • Basic Understanding: A scandal is essentially an event, action, or behavior that is perceived as morally wrong.
  • Moral vs Legal: Scandals often evoke outrage and moral condemnation, even if they do not necessarily breach legal statutes.
  • Key Characteristics:
    • Broad outrage and consensus on the event or behavior as scandalous.
    • May involve abuse of power or unethical actions (e.g., bribery).

Exemplification of Scandalous Actions

  • Notable Example: Houston Astros Sign-Stealing Scandal
    • Involved the team using an elaborate method to steal signs during games, broadly recognized as unethical behavior.
    • The National League champions, the Washington Nationals, countered the Astros' tactics by developing an intricate system of signs during the 2019 World Series.

The Complexity of Scandals in Athletics

  • Legality vs Ethics: Some actions labeled as scandalous are legally permissible but considered ethically reprehensible.
  • Specific Case: University of Wisconsin (2001)
    • Infraction: NCAA put the university on probation due to 150 athletes from 14 sports receiving unadvertised discounts at a shoe store.
    • Location: Shoebox in Black Earth, Wisconsin.
    • Discounts were provided uniquely to athletes and not available to other consumers.
    • Athletic department's lack of accountability for disparity in housing among students raised further concerns.

Ethical Dilemmas in College Sports

  • Widespread Practices: Norms such as budgets and financial priorities in college sports may lead to scandalous results without breaching any rules.
  • Historical Context:
    • Dave McClain: Popular football coach at Wisconsin who died in 1986; his legacy led to the building of a multimillion-dollar athletic facility.
    • Budget Shortfall: The hiring of a poor-performing replacement coach led to a significant financial impact on the university:
    • Loss of revenue from lack of attendance and performance
    • Resulted in a $20 million shortfall for the school, leading to student fee increases
    • Conclusion: This scenario reflects the ethical implications of how a bad football program can adversely affect the financial wellbeing of the university community without having violated any rules.

Scandals and Consequences in Major Programs

  • SMU Case: Southern Methodist University (SMU)
    • Background: Founded in 1911; notable alumni include football star Eric Dickerson.
    • The football program faced severe penalties due to repeated violations of NCAA rules involving a slush fund for provides to recruits.
    • Death Penalty:
    • The NCAA imposed a 'death penalty', halting SMU's football program for the 1987 season due to systematic and egregious infractions.
    • Previous Warnings: Had been on probation five times in the decade leading up to the sanctions.

Other Historical Scandals

  • University of Colorado: Sanctioned for providing drugs and prostitutes to recruits.
  • USC Reggie Bush: Reggie Bush gave up his Heisman Trophy due to payments made to support his family's living conditions.
  • University of Miami:
    • Scholarship athletes illegally received Pell Grants from the federal government—over $220,000 in federal funds distributed improperly.
    • Resulted in sanctions including the loss of scholarships and prohibition from postseason play for one year.

The Penn State Scandal

  • Joe Paterno's Legacy:
    • Highly respected football coach with an impressive record and passing marked by a commitment to education and modest living.
    • The Great Experiment: Objective to maintain high academic standards while excelling in football; he achieved higher than normal graduation rates for football players compared to peers.
  • Child Abuse Scandal:
    • Jerry Sandusky's arrest for 52 counts of child sexual abuse profoundly affected Penn State in 2011.
    • Paterno fulfilled reporting duties legally, but held higher moral responsibilities which he failed to uphold.
    • Consequences: Paterno was dismissed, leading to public outrage and obscuring the ethical breakdown prevalent in college sports culture.