Social+comparison+and+social+networking+sites
Introduction to Social Comparison on SNSs
Impact of Social Networking Sites (SNSs)
SNSs facilitate social comparisons at an unprecedented scale.
Concern about negative impacts on subjective well-being (SWB).
Key Areas of Research
Antecedents of social comparisons on SNSs.
Consequences of social comparisons on SWB.
Social comparison as a mediating or moderating factor between SNS use and SWB.
Characteristics of SNS Users
User Behavior and Comparisons
Factors influencing social comparisons include personality traits and usage patterns.
Passive use leads to increased social comparisons.
Examples of SNS Platforms
Facebook: 2.5 billion monthly active users.
Instagram: 1 billion users.
Twitter: 330 million users.
Average of over 2 hours spent on SNSs each day by users globally.
Understanding Social Comparison
Definition
Social comparison involves using others to assess one’s own abilities or to shape thoughts and emotions.
Types of Comparisons
Upward Comparison: Comparing oneself to those perceived as superior.
Downward Comparison: Comparing oneself to those perceived as inferior.
Outcomes of Comparisons
Assimilation: Positive self-evaluation after upward comparisons.
Contrast: Negative self-evaluation after upward comparisons.
Prevalence
More comparisons occur when targets are perceived as similar.
The idealization of others on SNSs fosters upwards comparisons.
Factors Influencing Social Comparison
Predictors of Social Comparison
Personal attributes, especially neuroticism, relate to increased upward comparison and envy.
The motives for engaging with SNSs impact comparison tendencies.
Usage Styles
Active Usage: Engaging directly with others through posts and messages.
Passive Usage: Browsing content without interaction leads to heightened feelings of envy and worsened SWB.
Research Evidence
Meta-analytic studies show a strong negative correlation between passive SNS use and SWB, while active use may enhance SWB.
Consequences of Social Comparison on SWB
General Findings
Social comparisons typically result in a decrease in SWB.
Upward comparisons have a medium-sized negative effect on SWB.
Not all comparisons lead to negative outcomes; certain contexts (e.g., opinion comparisons) may result in neutral or positive outcomes.
Downward Comparisons
Usually do not decrease SWB.
Response to Comparisons
Assimilation to positive targets can inspire, whereas contrast leads to negative feelings and self-doubt.
Social Comparison: Mediator or Moderator?
As a Mediator