488 Final
VO2 MAX
SECTION 1 — WHAT VO₂max ACTUALLY MEANS
1.1 Definition
VO₂max = maximal oxygen consumption
→ the highest rate at which your body can take in, transport, and utilize oxygen during intense exercise.
It reflects aerobic power and the combined capacity of:
Pulmonary system (oxygen intake)
Cardiovascular system (oxygen delivery)
Muscular system (oxygen extraction and utilization)
Exam phrase:
“VO₂max is the integrated measure of cardiorespiratory and metabolic function during large-muscle mass exercise.”
SECTION 2 — THE FICK EQUATION (THE CORE OF EVERYTHING)
VO₂max exists because of Fick’s principle, the way your professor LOVES to ask about it.
Fick Equation:
VO2=Q×(a−vO2difference)VO₂ = Q × (a-vO₂ difference)VO2=Q×(a−vO2difference)
Where:
Q = Cardiac Output = HR × SV
a-vO₂ difference = oxygen extracted by muscles from blood
This equation is the heart of VO₂max.
2.1 HR (Heart Rate)
Increases linearly with workload
Max HR is genetically determined
HR is a limiting factor in VO₂max
2.2 SV (Stroke Volume)
Amount of blood ejected per beat
Training increases SV
SV plateau occurs around 40–60% VO₂max in most people
Elite athletes may have no SV plateau
2.3 Cardiac Output (Q)
The MOST IMPORTANT determinant of VO₂max
Elite endurance athletes have massive Q values
VO₂max increases when Q increases
2.4 a-vO₂ difference
Muscles pull more O₂ from blood as intensity increases
Training increases:
Capillary density
Mitochondrial number
Mitochondrial efficiency
Hemoglobin content
Enzyme activity
Exam tip:
If a question asks, “Where do adaptations occur that improve VO₂max?”
→ Both central (heart) and peripheral (muscles).
SECTION 3 — HOW VO₂max IS MEASURED (TRUE MAX VS PEAK)
3.1 True Maximal VO₂ Testing
Test design:
Graded exercise test (GXT)
Intensity increases every 1–3 minutes
Uses a metabolic cart
Measures breath-by-breath O₂ and CO₂
Continues until voluntary exhaustion
3.2 Physiological Indicators of True VO₂max
Your professor can easily ask:
“How do you know if a subject actually reached VO₂max?”
You must memorize these:
VO₂ Plateau
→ <150 mL/min increase with rising workloadRER ≥ 1.10
→ Hyperventilation & buffering of lactic acidHR within 10 bpm of predicted max
Blood lactate ≥ 8 mmol/L (if measured)
RPE ≥ 17 on Borg scale
RER ≥ 1.10 appears in almost every exam question.
SECTION 4 — SUBMAXIMAL VO₂max TESTING (EASIER + SAFER)
Your final exam will likely ask:
“Why do we use submax tests?”
Answer:
Safer
Less time-consuming
No need for metabolic cart
Relies on linear HR–workload relationship
Submax protocols:
YMCA cycle test
Astrand-Ryhming test
Rockport walk test
Submax treadmill tests
How submax estimation works:
Measure HR at two submax workloads.
Apply linear regression to predict HRmax.
Extrapolate workload → VO₂max.
Key assumption:
HR increases linearly with intensity.
SECTION 5 — ABSOLUTE VS RELATIVE VO₂
This ALWAYS appears on the exam.
5.1 Absolute VO₂
L/min
Total oxygen consumption
Depends heavily on body size
Used to estimate caloric expenditure
5.2 Relative VO₂
mL/kg/min
Corrected for body mass
Allows comparison between individuals
Why it matters:
A large person will always have higher absolute VO₂, but may have lower relative VO₂.
SECTION 6 — FACTORS THAT AFFECT VO₂max (MUST KNOW)
6.1 INCREASE VO₂max
Aerobic training
Higher stroke volume
Increased blood volume
Increased capillaries
Increased mitochondria
Increased a-vO₂ difference
Lower resting and submax HR
Improved lactate threshold
6.2 DECREASE VO₂max
Age
Detraining
Sedentary behavior
Disease (cardiac, pulmonary, metabolic)
Low hemoglobin
Acute altitude (due to less O₂ pressure)
SECTION 7 — RER (Respiratory Exchange Ratio)
FLAT OUT: if you see RER, expect exam questions.
What is RER?
RER=VCO2VO2RER = \frac{VCO₂}{VO₂}RER=VO2VCO2
What it tells you:
RER ≈ 0.70 → Mostly fats
RER ≈ 0.85 → Mixed
RER ≈ 1.00 → Mostly carbs
RER ≥ 1.10 → Near maximal effort (hyperventilation)
Why RER increases at high intensity:
Lactate buildup
Bicarbonate buffering
Excess CO₂ drives ventilation
Exam tip:
RER is the easiest way to know if a subject reached VO₂max.
SECTION 8 — WHY WEARABLES CAN’T MEASURE VO₂max DIRECTLY
This will be on your exam — guaranteed.
Wearables do NOT measure VO₂.
They predict VO₂max using:
HR
HR variability
GPS speed
Accelerometry
Algorithms
Population data models
Why they’re less accurate:
HR is affected by caffeine, stress, hydration, heat
Movement patterns differ person to person
Algorithms assume “average physiology”
Cannot measure gas exchange
Wrist HR sensors lose accuracy during movement
No direct measurement of ventilation or oxygen uptake
Common exam question:
“Why does wearable VO₂max differ from lab VO₂max?”
Answer:
Because wearables estimate, while the metabolic cart measures.
SECTION 9 — VO₂max GRAPHS (EXAM GUARANTEED)
Your exam will likely show the following:
Graph Type 1: HR vs Time
Linear increase
Should approach HRmax as intensity rises
Exam Q:
“Is this maximal?”
→ Check for HR plateau + RER if provided.
Graph Type 2: VO₂ vs Workload
Rises gradually
True VO₂max shows a plateau
If no plateau → “VO₂ peak,” NOT VO₂max
Graph Type 3: RER vs Time
Starts 0.70–0.85
Climbs past 1.0
Above 1.10 → near max effort
SECTION 10 — TYPICAL VO₂max VALUES (Useful for MCQs)
Male college-aged: 40–45 mL/kg/min
Female college-aged: 35–40 mL/kg/min
Elite endurance: 70+ mL/kg/min
Sedentary: ~25–30 mL/kg/min
SECTION 11 — COMMON EXAM-LEVEL QUESTIONS
You MUST be able to answer these:
1. What physiological systems contribute to VO₂max?
→ Pulmonary, cardiovascular, muscular.
2. What is the primary determinant of VO₂max?
→ Stroke volume / cardiac output.
3. Why does VO₂max improve with training?
→ ↑ SV, ↑ mitochondria, ↑ capillaries, ↑ blood volume.
4. Why does VO₂max decrease with detraining?
→ ↓ plasma volume, ↓ SV, ↓ mitochondrial density.
5. Why can someone reach “VO₂ peak” but not “VO₂max”?
→ Lack of plateau, or peripheral limitations.
6. Why are submax tests used instead of max tests?
→ Safer, quicker, HR-based estimation.
7. Why are wearables less accurate?
→ Prediction vs. measurement.
8. What is the RER threshold for true max?
→ 1.10.
SECTION 12 — QUICK MEMORY HACKS
“VO₂ is HR × SV × Extraction”
If any part is limited → VO₂ is limited.
“RER = Effort”
The higher the RER, the higher the effort.
“Relative VO₂ = fair comparison”
Relative corrects for body size.
“Plateau = max”
If VO₂ plateaus with rising workload, that’s your VO₂max.
You now have:
A complete physiological understanding
All the exam-level definitions
The criteria
The graphs
The submax logic
The wearable tech connection
Wearable Tech
SECTION 1 — What Wearables Actually Do
1.1 The Key Point
Wearables do NOT measure VO₂max.
They predict VO₂max.
This is the FIRST thing your exam wants you to understand.
Wearables estimate VO₂max using:
Heart rate (optical sensor or chest strap)
Heart rate variability (HRV)
Accelerometry (movement data)
GPS speed + distance
Machine-learning algorithms
Population prediction equations
They are statistical tools, not physiological measurement devices.
SECTION 2 — Why Wearables Can’t Measure VO₂max
2.1 They do not measure gas exchange
True VO₂max requires:
Measuring O₂ consumption
Measuring CO₂ production
Breath-by-breath analysis (metabolic cart)
Wearables cannot measure:
Ventilation
Expired gases
RER
Oxygen uptake
CO₂ output
Therefore:
They cannot measure VO₂max directly. Only estimate.
SECTION 3 — HOW Wearables Estimate VO₂max (The Algorithm)
Wearables use a multi-variable prediction algorithm.
Different companies tweak the formula, but the core logic is the same.
3.1 During Running or Walking (the most common method)
They combine:
Steady-state HR
Running speed / walking pace
HR at known workloads
User profile inputs:
age
gender
weight
height
training status
3.2 Logic behind the estimation
Since there is a strong linear relationship between HR and VO₂, the device uses this relationship to project your max capacity.
If the wearable sees:
You’re running at a certain speed
Your HR is at a certain level
Your stride pattern matches a certain intensity
It compares you to known population curves.
Then it predicts:
“Based on how your HR responds to this workload, your VO₂max is estimated to be ___ mL/kg/min.”
This is essentially a submax test done automatically.
SECTION 4 — Sensors Used & How They Work
4.1 Optical Heart Rate Sensors (PPG – photoplethysmography)
Most wrist devices use green light to detect:
pulsatile blood volume
HR
HR variability
Limitations:
Motion artifacts
Tattoo interference
Cold weather
Darker skin tones
Wrist movement
Sweat between sensor + skin
Muscle tension
These factors change HR accuracy, which directly impacts VO₂max prediction.
4.2 Accelerometers
Detect:
step count
stride length
cadence
acceleration patterns
running/walking intensity
These help estimate energy cost, but increase error when:
running on uneven terrain
stopping/starting
uphill/downhill
different gait patterns
heavy arm swing
treadmill running (no GPS)
4.3 GPS Sensors
Measure:
Speed
Distance
Pace
Terrain changes
GPS error increases with:
trees
tunnels
buildings
cloudy weather
switching satellites
rapid turns
Pace errors → intensity errors → VO₂max errors.
SECTION 5 — Company-Specific Algorithms (What Exams Might Ask)
Garmin / Polar / Coros / Suunto
Use the FirstBeat Analytics algorithm.
Core inputs:
HR response to workload
HR variability
Speed
Power (running power optional)
Training history
Recovery metrics
Apple Watch
Uses:
Walking/running workouts
HR + pace relationship
Historical fitness data
Calibration from multiple workouts
Age/weight/height
Biggest limitation:
Must have consistent GPS calibration
Must complete multiple 20+ min outdoor workouts to improve accuracy
Fitbit
Uses a simpler model:
resting HR
user profile
activity history
HR during vigorous bouts
Less accurate because:
Doesn’t require structured workouts
Lacks advanced modeling
More HR error under movement
SECTION 6 — Sources of Error in Wearable VO₂max
This WILL be on your exam.
6.1 Heart rate errors
The biggest problem.
HR drives the entire prediction model.
If HR is inaccurate → VO₂max is inaccurate.
Conditions that cause HR error:
wrist flexion
gripping weights
cold weather
tattoos
skin tone differences
sweat
hydration
caffeine
stress
anxiety
dehydration
6.2 Running form variability
Wearables assume:
A “normal” stride
Predictable biomechanics
Constant pace
Any deviation increases error:
forefoot vs heel strike
uphill running
holding phone in hand (affects arm swing)
treadmill workouts without GPS
6.3 Fatigue & Cardiac Drift
As you exercise:
HR climbs due to heat
Not because VO₂ increases
Wearables may interpret this as reduced fitness.
6.4 Environmental conditions
Heat → higher HR
Humidity → higher HR
Cold → lower HR
Altitude → higher HR
Wearables do not fully account for these.
6.5 User-entry errors
incorrect weight
incorrect age
incorrect gender
inconsistent running pace
SECTION 7 — Why Wearable VO₂max is Still Useful
Despite error, wearable VO₂max has good trend reliability.
Meaning:
It’s not perfectly accurate,
But it’s consistent enough to track changes over time.
Great for:
Long-term monitoring
Fitness progress
Training adjustment
Motivation
Population-level risk prediction
Not great for:
Diagnosing disease
Cardiopulmonary testing
Comparing athletes
Precise physiology
SECTION 8 — Lab VO₂max vs Wearable VO₂max (Testing vs Prediction)
This will be an exam question.
Lab VO₂max (Metabolic Cart):
Measures oxygen uptake directly
Most accurate
Gold standard
Requires maximal effort
Provides RER
Provides HR
Provides ventilation data
Expensive
Requires trained personnel
Wearable Estimated VO₂max:
Predicts using models
Quick
Cheap
Convenient
Accessible
No gas analysis
Accuracy varies
Influenced by movement + environment
Key exam phrase:
“Wearables do not measure VO₂max; they estimate it using HR and workload relationships based on population algorithms.”
SECTION 9 — Why Wearables Often UNDERESTIMATE VO₂max
Wrist HR inaccuracies
Poor GPS calibration
Treadmill running (no GPS)
Irregular gait patterns
Low training history
Short workouts
Older algorithms
High stress or caffeine
Cold temperatures
Example exam Q:
“An athlete reports much lower VO₂max values on their wearable compared to a lab test. Why?”
Answer: HR sensor limitations, algorithm assumptions, non-steady-state pace, environmental conditions.
SECTION 10 — Why Wearables Sometimes OVERestimate VO₂max
HR reading too LOW
Very efficient runner
Strong cardiovascular system
Caffeine lowering perceived HR workload
Dehydration lowering HR early in workout
Pace variations (downhill running)
Heat acclimation (lower HR at a given pace)
SECTION 11 — EXAM-LEVEL QUESTIONS YOU SHOULD EXPECT
Here are the exact types of questions your professor will ask:
1. “Why do wearable VO₂max values differ from lab VO₂max values?”
→ Because wearables predict VO₂max based on HR, pace, and algorithms rather than direct gas exchange measurement.
2. “List three sources of error in wearable VO₂max estimation.”
→ HR sensor inaccuracy, GPS errors, environmental conditions, biomechanical differences.
3. “Why does heart rate drive wearable VO₂max predictions?”
→ Because HR has a linear relationship with oxygen consumption up to moderate intensities.
4. “How do wearables use submaximal effort to estimate VO₂max?”
→ They look at HR response to pace and extrapolate to predicted maximum.
5. “What improvements have made wearables more accurate over time?”
→ Better sensors, better algorithms, machine learning, longer user data histories.
6. “Why do trained individuals sometimes get inaccurate wearable VO₂max readings?”
→ Because their biomechanics differ from population averages and algorithms may assume “average” physiology.
7. “What does wrist-based HR struggle with compared to chest strap HR?”
→ Movement artifacts → incorrect HR → incorrect VO₂max estimate.
SECTION 12 — CONCEPTS THAT CONNECT TO OTHER PARTS OF YOUR FINAL
Wearable VO₂max ties directly into:
VO₂max criteria
HR and workload relationships
Submax vs max protocols
Why lab testing is the gold standard
Accuracy vs reliability
Field tests vs lab tests
Isokinetic Testing
SECTION 1 — WHAT IS ISOKINETIC TESTING?
1.1 Definition
Isokinetic = same speed.
It is a form of muscle strength testing where the machine holds movement velocity constant, no matter how hard the person pushes.
Typical devices: Biodex / Cybex / Humac Norm
The machine:
Controls speed
Measures torque
Adjusts resistance automatically throughout ROM
Key point:
The machine matches the user’s force output at every angle — that’s why resistance changes dynamically.
SECTION 2 — WHY USE ISOKINETIC TESTING? (Exam Favorite)
Reasons:
Gold-standard for joint-specific strength assessment
Provides detailed torque curves
Can isolate agonist vs antagonist muscle groups
Safe, even at high intensities
Velocities can be programmed
Highly reliable when protocol is standardized
Advantages:
Maximal muscle effort across entire ROM
Very sensitive measurement
Excellent for rehab progression
Good for return-to-sport decisions
Can detect muscle imbalances
Allows testing eccentric, concentric, and isometric modes
SECTION 3 — PHYSIOLOGY: WHY TORQUE CHANGES WITH JOINT ANGLE
You MUST understand this for graph questions.
3.1 Torque is NOT constant across ROM
Torque depends on:
Muscle length
Lever arm length
Joint angle
Mechanical advantage
Muscles create the most torque at mid-range, where:
Actin–myosin overlap is optimal
The lever arm is longest
The muscle is neither too stretched nor too shortened
Torque is weakest at:
Beginning of ROM (muscle too stretched)
End of ROM (muscle too shortened)
This creates the classic bell-shaped torque curve in concentric testing.
SECTION 4 — SPEED MATTERS: VELOCITY–TORQUE RELATIONSHIP
This is one of the MOST tested concepts.
4.1 At slow speeds (e.g., 60°/sec)
You produce more torque
This is a strength test
Muscles can develop maximum force at slow speeds
4.2 At moderate speeds (120°/sec)
Less torque than 60°/sec
Measures strength + power
4.3 At high speeds (180–300°/sec)
Torque decreases
Measures muscular endurance or “power-endurance”
Good for return-to-sport
Exam summary phrase:
“As speed increases, peak torque decreases.”
This is ALWAYS true in concentric testing.
SECTION 5 — COMMON ISOKINETIC MODES
5.1 Concentric-Concentric
Example: quadriceps + hamstrings
Most common clinical mode.
5.2 Concentric-Eccentric
Used in ACL rehab to test:
Concentric quadriceps
Eccentric hamstrings (important for deceleration)
5.3 Eccentric-Eccentric
Dangerous for beginners; high forces.
5.4 Isometric
Not technically “isokinetic,” but machines can measure static torque at specific joint angles.
SECTION 6 — NORMAL VALUES & COMMON RATIOS (NEED TO KNOW)
6.1 H:Q Ratio (Hamstrings:Quadriceps)
Healthy ratio:
0.55–0.80 depending on speed
Lower ratio → quad dominance → ACL risk
Higher ratio → hamstring > quad strength (rare)
Exams LOVE these:
At 60°/sec → H:Q ≈ 0.5–0.6
At 180°/sec → H:Q ≈ 0.7–0.8
Why it increases at higher speeds:
Hamstrings have better performance at higher speeds due to muscle fiber composition and joint mechanics.
SECTION 7 — PEAK TORQUE
Definition:
The highest torque produced across ROM at a given speed.
Where it usually occurs:
Mid-range of movement.
Why it matters:
Indicates maximal strength capability
Compares limb dominance
Tracks rehab progress
SECTION 8 — TORQUE CURVES (MOST IMPORTANT FOR EXAM)
8.1 Concentric torque curve
Usually bell-shaped due to:
Suboptimal force at start/end
Optimal overlap & lever arm at mid-ROM
If the curve is flat or erratic:
→ poor effort
→ pain inhibition
→ mechanical issues
→ incorrect machine setup
8.2 Eccentric torque curve
Higher torque overall:
Eccentric can produce 20–40% more force
Curve may look spikier due to stretch-reflex involvement
SECTION 9 — WHAT IS RELIABILITY IN ISOKINETIC TESTING?
Your professor will probably ask this.
Isokinetics are reliable IF:
Joint axis is aligned correctly
Straps are tight
Warm-up is standardized
Instructions are consistent
Velocities are correct
Limb stabilization is proper
Within-day reliability is excellent.
Between-day reliability is good if standardized.
SECTION 10 — COMMON SOURCES OF ERROR
These ALWAYS show up in exam questions.
10.1 Misalignment
If the machine axis doesn’t match the joint axis → torque error.
10.2 Poor stabilization
If the trunk or hips move → momentum helps → torque inflated.
10.3 Lack of warm-up
Underestimates strength.
10.4 Pain inhibition
Reduces torque output.
10.5 Learning effect
First rep may be poor → always warm up first.
10.6 Velocity mismatch
Incorrect speed setting = incorrect interpretation.
10.7 Gravity correction errors
Particularly important for knee extension testing.
SECTION 11 — EXAM INTERPRETATION QUESTIONS YOU MUST KNOW
11.1 “What does a higher peak torque at 60°/sec mean?”
→ Higher maximal strength.
11.2 “Why is torque lower at higher speeds?”
→ Force–velocity relationship of muscle.
11.3 “Subject produces inconsistent torque curves. What happened?”
Poor effort
Pain
Fatigue
Stabilization errors
Misalignment
11.4 “Why is eccentric torque higher than concentric torque?”
→ Cross-bridge mechanics + stretch reflex + lower ATP cost.
11.5 “Athlete shows low H:Q ratio. What does that indicate?”
→ Quad dominance → increased ACL injury risk.
11.6 “Why test multiple speeds?”
→ Different speeds = different qualities (strength, power, endurance).
PUTTING IT ALL TOGETHER: WHAT YOUR PROFESSOR WANTS YOU TO UNDERSTAND
Isokinetic testing is the gold standard for objective strength assessment.
Torque varies across ROM because of muscle length + lever mechanics.
Speed controls force production via force–velocity relationship.
Proper alignment + stabilization are CRITICAL for accurate results.
Peak torque is the primary output to compare limbs.
H:Q ratio is extremely important in knee testing.
Torque curves provide insight into effort, pain, or joint function.
Testing multiple speeds assesses strength → power → endurance.