488 Final

VO2 MAX

SECTION 1 — WHAT VO₂max ACTUALLY MEANS

1.1 Definition

VO₂max = maximal oxygen consumption
→ the highest rate at which your body can take in, transport, and utilize oxygen during intense exercise.

It reflects aerobic power and the combined capacity of:

  • Pulmonary system (oxygen intake)

  • Cardiovascular system (oxygen delivery)

  • Muscular system (oxygen extraction and utilization)

Exam phrase:
“VO₂max is the integrated measure of cardiorespiratory and metabolic function during large-muscle mass exercise.”


SECTION 2 — THE FICK EQUATION (THE CORE OF EVERYTHING)

VO₂max exists because of Fick’s principle, the way your professor LOVES to ask about it.

Fick Equation:

VO2=Q×(a−vO2difference)VO₂ = Q × (a-vO₂ difference)VO2​=Q×(a−vO2​difference)

Where:

  • Q = Cardiac Output = HR × SV

  • a-vO₂ difference = oxygen extracted by muscles from blood

This equation is the heart of VO₂max.

2.1 HR (Heart Rate)

  • Increases linearly with workload

  • Max HR is genetically determined

  • HR is a limiting factor in VO₂max

2.2 SV (Stroke Volume)

  • Amount of blood ejected per beat

  • Training increases SV

  • SV plateau occurs around 40–60% VO₂max in most people

  • Elite athletes may have no SV plateau

2.3 Cardiac Output (Q)

  • The MOST IMPORTANT determinant of VO₂max

  • Elite endurance athletes have massive Q values

  • VO₂max increases when Q increases

2.4 a-vO₂ difference

  • Muscles pull more O₂ from blood as intensity increases

  • Training increases:

    • Capillary density

    • Mitochondrial number

    • Mitochondrial efficiency

    • Hemoglobin content

    • Enzyme activity

Exam tip:
If a question asks, “Where do adaptations occur that improve VO₂max?”
Both central (heart) and peripheral (muscles).


SECTION 3 — HOW VO₂max IS MEASURED (TRUE MAX VS PEAK)

3.1 True Maximal VO₂ Testing

Test design:

  • Graded exercise test (GXT)

  • Intensity increases every 1–3 minutes

  • Uses a metabolic cart

  • Measures breath-by-breath O₂ and CO₂

  • Continues until voluntary exhaustion

3.2 Physiological Indicators of True VO₂max

Your professor can easily ask:
“How do you know if a subject actually reached VO₂max?”

You must memorize these:

  1. VO₂ Plateau
    → <150 mL/min increase with rising workload

  2. RER ≥ 1.10
    → Hyperventilation & buffering of lactic acid

  3. HR within 10 bpm of predicted max

  4. Blood lactate ≥ 8 mmol/L (if measured)

  5. RPE ≥ 17 on Borg scale

RER ≥ 1.10 appears in almost every exam question.


SECTION 4 — SUBMAXIMAL VO₂max TESTING (EASIER + SAFER)

Your final exam will likely ask:

“Why do we use submax tests?”

Answer:

  • Safer

  • Less time-consuming

  • No need for metabolic cart

  • Relies on linear HR–workload relationship

Submax protocols:

  • YMCA cycle test

  • Astrand-Ryhming test

  • Rockport walk test

  • Submax treadmill tests

How submax estimation works:

  1. Measure HR at two submax workloads.

  2. Apply linear regression to predict HRmax.

  3. Extrapolate workload → VO₂max.

Key assumption:
HR increases linearly with intensity.


SECTION 5 — ABSOLUTE VS RELATIVE VO₂

This ALWAYS appears on the exam.

5.1 Absolute VO₂

  • L/min

  • Total oxygen consumption

  • Depends heavily on body size

  • Used to estimate caloric expenditure

5.2 Relative VO₂

  • mL/kg/min

  • Corrected for body mass

  • Allows comparison between individuals

Why it matters:
A large person will always have higher absolute VO₂, but may have lower relative VO₂.


SECTION 6 — FACTORS THAT AFFECT VO₂max (MUST KNOW)

6.1 INCREASE VO₂max

  • Aerobic training

  • Higher stroke volume

  • Increased blood volume

  • Increased capillaries

  • Increased mitochondria

  • Increased a-vO₂ difference

  • Lower resting and submax HR

  • Improved lactate threshold

6.2 DECREASE VO₂max

  • Age

  • Detraining

  • Sedentary behavior

  • Disease (cardiac, pulmonary, metabolic)

  • Low hemoglobin

  • Acute altitude (due to less O₂ pressure)


SECTION 7 — RER (Respiratory Exchange Ratio)

FLAT OUT: if you see RER, expect exam questions.

What is RER?

RER=VCO2VO2RER = \frac{VCO₂}{VO₂}RER=VO2​VCO2​​

What it tells you:

  • RER ≈ 0.70 → Mostly fats

  • RER ≈ 0.85 → Mixed

  • RER ≈ 1.00 → Mostly carbs

  • RER ≥ 1.10 → Near maximal effort (hyperventilation)

Why RER increases at high intensity:

  • Lactate buildup

  • Bicarbonate buffering

  • Excess CO₂ drives ventilation

Exam tip:
RER is the easiest way to know if a subject reached VO₂max.


SECTION 8 — WHY WEARABLES CAN’T MEASURE VO₂max DIRECTLY

This will be on your exam — guaranteed.

Wearables do NOT measure VO₂.
They predict VO₂max using:

  • HR

  • HR variability

  • GPS speed

  • Accelerometry

  • Algorithms

  • Population data models

Why they’re less accurate:

  • HR is affected by caffeine, stress, hydration, heat

  • Movement patterns differ person to person

  • Algorithms assume “average physiology”

  • Cannot measure gas exchange

  • Wrist HR sensors lose accuracy during movement

  • No direct measurement of ventilation or oxygen uptake

Common exam question:

“Why does wearable VO₂max differ from lab VO₂max?”

Answer:
Because wearables estimate, while the metabolic cart measures.


SECTION 9 — VO₂max GRAPHS (EXAM GUARANTEED)

Your exam will likely show the following:


Graph Type 1: HR vs Time

  • Linear increase

  • Should approach HRmax as intensity rises

Exam Q:
“Is this maximal?”
→ Check for HR plateau + RER if provided.


Graph Type 2: VO₂ vs Workload

  • Rises gradually

  • True VO₂max shows a plateau

  • If no plateau → “VO₂ peak,” NOT VO₂max


Graph Type 3: RER vs Time

  • Starts 0.70–0.85

  • Climbs past 1.0

  • Above 1.10 → near max effort


SECTION 10 — TYPICAL VO₂max VALUES (Useful for MCQs)

  • Male college-aged: 40–45 mL/kg/min

  • Female college-aged: 35–40 mL/kg/min

  • Elite endurance: 70+ mL/kg/min

  • Sedentary: ~25–30 mL/kg/min


SECTION 11 — COMMON EXAM-LEVEL QUESTIONS

You MUST be able to answer these:

1. What physiological systems contribute to VO₂max?

→ Pulmonary, cardiovascular, muscular.

2. What is the primary determinant of VO₂max?

→ Stroke volume / cardiac output.

3. Why does VO₂max improve with training?

→ ↑ SV, ↑ mitochondria, ↑ capillaries, ↑ blood volume.

4. Why does VO₂max decrease with detraining?

→ ↓ plasma volume, ↓ SV, ↓ mitochondrial density.

5. Why can someone reach “VO₂ peak” but not “VO₂max”?

→ Lack of plateau, or peripheral limitations.

6. Why are submax tests used instead of max tests?

→ Safer, quicker, HR-based estimation.

7. Why are wearables less accurate?

→ Prediction vs. measurement.

8. What is the RER threshold for true max?

→ 1.10.


SECTION 12 — QUICK MEMORY HACKS

“VO₂ is HR × SV × Extraction”

If any part is limited → VO₂ is limited.

“RER = Effort”

The higher the RER, the higher the effort.

“Relative VO₂ = fair comparison”

Relative corrects for body size.

“Plateau = max”

If VO₂ plateaus with rising workload, that’s your VO₂max.


You now have:

  • A complete physiological understanding

  • All the exam-level definitions

  • The criteria

  • The graphs

  • The submax logic

  • The wearable tech connection

Wearable Tech

SECTION 1 — What Wearables Actually Do

1.1 The Key Point

Wearables do NOT measure VO₂max.
They predict VO₂max.

This is the FIRST thing your exam wants you to understand.

Wearables estimate VO₂max using:

  • Heart rate (optical sensor or chest strap)

  • Heart rate variability (HRV)

  • Accelerometry (movement data)

  • GPS speed + distance

  • Machine-learning algorithms

  • Population prediction equations

They are statistical tools, not physiological measurement devices.


SECTION 2 — Why Wearables Can’t Measure VO₂max

2.1 They do not measure gas exchange

True VO₂max requires:

  • Measuring O₂ consumption

  • Measuring CO₂ production

  • Breath-by-breath analysis (metabolic cart)

Wearables cannot measure:

  • Ventilation

  • Expired gases

  • RER

  • Oxygen uptake

  • CO₂ output

Therefore:
They cannot measure VO₂max directly. Only estimate.


SECTION 3 — HOW Wearables Estimate VO₂max (The Algorithm)

Wearables use a multi-variable prediction algorithm.
Different companies tweak the formula, but the core logic is the same.

3.1 During Running or Walking (the most common method)

They combine:

  • Steady-state HR

  • Running speed / walking pace

  • HR at known workloads

  • User profile inputs:

    • age

    • gender

    • weight

    • height

    • training status

3.2 Logic behind the estimation

Since there is a strong linear relationship between HR and VO₂, the device uses this relationship to project your max capacity.

If the wearable sees:

  • You’re running at a certain speed

  • Your HR is at a certain level

  • Your stride pattern matches a certain intensity
    It compares you to known population curves.

Then it predicts:
“Based on how your HR responds to this workload, your VO₂max is estimated to be ___ mL/kg/min.”

This is essentially a submax test done automatically.


SECTION 4 — Sensors Used & How They Work

4.1 Optical Heart Rate Sensors (PPG – photoplethysmography)

Most wrist devices use green light to detect:

  • pulsatile blood volume

  • HR

  • HR variability

Limitations:

  • Motion artifacts

  • Tattoo interference

  • Cold weather

  • Darker skin tones

  • Wrist movement

  • Sweat between sensor + skin

  • Muscle tension

These factors change HR accuracy, which directly impacts VO₂max prediction.


4.2 Accelerometers

Detect:

  • step count

  • stride length

  • cadence

  • acceleration patterns

  • running/walking intensity

These help estimate energy cost, but increase error when:

  • running on uneven terrain

  • stopping/starting

  • uphill/downhill

  • different gait patterns

  • heavy arm swing

  • treadmill running (no GPS)


4.3 GPS Sensors

Measure:

  • Speed

  • Distance

  • Pace

  • Terrain changes

GPS error increases with:

  • trees

  • tunnels

  • buildings

  • cloudy weather

  • switching satellites

  • rapid turns

Pace errors → intensity errors → VO₂max errors.


SECTION 5 — Company-Specific Algorithms (What Exams Might Ask)

Garmin / Polar / Coros / Suunto

Use the FirstBeat Analytics algorithm.

Core inputs:

  • HR response to workload

  • HR variability

  • Speed

  • Power (running power optional)

  • Training history

  • Recovery metrics

Apple Watch

Uses:

  • Walking/running workouts

  • HR + pace relationship

  • Historical fitness data

  • Calibration from multiple workouts

  • Age/weight/height

Biggest limitation:

  • Must have consistent GPS calibration

  • Must complete multiple 20+ min outdoor workouts to improve accuracy

Fitbit

Uses a simpler model:

  • resting HR

  • user profile

  • activity history

  • HR during vigorous bouts

Less accurate because:

  • Doesn’t require structured workouts

  • Lacks advanced modeling

  • More HR error under movement


SECTION 6 — Sources of Error in Wearable VO₂max

This WILL be on your exam.

6.1 Heart rate errors

The biggest problem.
HR drives the entire prediction model.

If HR is inaccurate → VO₂max is inaccurate.

Conditions that cause HR error:

  • wrist flexion

  • gripping weights

  • cold weather

  • tattoos

  • skin tone differences

  • sweat

  • hydration

  • caffeine

  • stress

  • anxiety

  • dehydration

6.2 Running form variability

Wearables assume:

  • A “normal” stride

  • Predictable biomechanics

  • Constant pace

Any deviation increases error:

  • forefoot vs heel strike

  • uphill running

  • holding phone in hand (affects arm swing)

  • treadmill workouts without GPS

6.3 Fatigue & Cardiac Drift

As you exercise:

  • HR climbs due to heat

  • Not because VO₂ increases
    Wearables may interpret this as reduced fitness.

6.4 Environmental conditions

  • Heat → higher HR

  • Humidity → higher HR

  • Cold → lower HR

  • Altitude → higher HR

Wearables do not fully account for these.

6.5 User-entry errors

  • incorrect weight

  • incorrect age

  • incorrect gender

  • inconsistent running pace


SECTION 7 — Why Wearable VO₂max is Still Useful

Despite error, wearable VO₂max has good trend reliability.

Meaning:

  • It’s not perfectly accurate,

  • But it’s consistent enough to track changes over time.

Great for:

  • Long-term monitoring

  • Fitness progress

  • Training adjustment

  • Motivation

  • Population-level risk prediction

Not great for:

  • Diagnosing disease

  • Cardiopulmonary testing

  • Comparing athletes

  • Precise physiology


SECTION 8 — Lab VO₂max vs Wearable VO₂max (Testing vs Prediction)

This will be an exam question.

Lab VO₂max (Metabolic Cart):

  • Measures oxygen uptake directly

  • Most accurate

  • Gold standard

  • Requires maximal effort

  • Provides RER

  • Provides HR

  • Provides ventilation data

  • Expensive

  • Requires trained personnel

Wearable Estimated VO₂max:

  • Predicts using models

  • Quick

  • Cheap

  • Convenient

  • Accessible

  • No gas analysis

  • Accuracy varies

  • Influenced by movement + environment

Key exam phrase:

“Wearables do not measure VO₂max; they estimate it using HR and workload relationships based on population algorithms.”


SECTION 9 — Why Wearables Often UNDERESTIMATE VO₂max

  • Wrist HR inaccuracies

  • Poor GPS calibration

  • Treadmill running (no GPS)

  • Irregular gait patterns

  • Low training history

  • Short workouts

  • Older algorithms

  • High stress or caffeine

  • Cold temperatures

Example exam Q:

“An athlete reports much lower VO₂max values on their wearable compared to a lab test. Why?”

Answer: HR sensor limitations, algorithm assumptions, non-steady-state pace, environmental conditions.


SECTION 10 — Why Wearables Sometimes OVERestimate VO₂max

  • HR reading too LOW

  • Very efficient runner

  • Strong cardiovascular system

  • Caffeine lowering perceived HR workload

  • Dehydration lowering HR early in workout

  • Pace variations (downhill running)

  • Heat acclimation (lower HR at a given pace)


SECTION 11 — EXAM-LEVEL QUESTIONS YOU SHOULD EXPECT

Here are the exact types of questions your professor will ask:

1. “Why do wearable VO₂max values differ from lab VO₂max values?”

→ Because wearables predict VO₂max based on HR, pace, and algorithms rather than direct gas exchange measurement.

2. “List three sources of error in wearable VO₂max estimation.”

→ HR sensor inaccuracy, GPS errors, environmental conditions, biomechanical differences.

3. “Why does heart rate drive wearable VO₂max predictions?”

→ Because HR has a linear relationship with oxygen consumption up to moderate intensities.

4. “How do wearables use submaximal effort to estimate VO₂max?”

→ They look at HR response to pace and extrapolate to predicted maximum.

5. “What improvements have made wearables more accurate over time?”

→ Better sensors, better algorithms, machine learning, longer user data histories.

6. “Why do trained individuals sometimes get inaccurate wearable VO₂max readings?”

→ Because their biomechanics differ from population averages and algorithms may assume “average” physiology.

7. “What does wrist-based HR struggle with compared to chest strap HR?”

→ Movement artifacts → incorrect HR → incorrect VO₂max estimate.


SECTION 12 — CONCEPTS THAT CONNECT TO OTHER PARTS OF YOUR FINAL

Wearable VO₂max ties directly into:

  • VO₂max criteria

  • HR and workload relationships

  • Submax vs max protocols

  • Why lab testing is the gold standard

  • Accuracy vs reliability

  • Field tests vs lab tests

Isokinetic Testing

SECTION 1 — WHAT IS ISOKINETIC TESTING?

1.1 Definition

Isokinetic = same speed.
It is a form of muscle strength testing where the machine holds movement velocity constant, no matter how hard the person pushes.

Typical devices: Biodex / Cybex / Humac Norm

The machine:

  • Controls speed

  • Measures torque

  • Adjusts resistance automatically throughout ROM

Key point:
The machine matches the user’s force output at every angle — that’s why resistance changes dynamically.


SECTION 2 — WHY USE ISOKINETIC TESTING? (Exam Favorite)

Reasons:

  • Gold-standard for joint-specific strength assessment

  • Provides detailed torque curves

  • Can isolate agonist vs antagonist muscle groups

  • Safe, even at high intensities

  • Velocities can be programmed

  • Highly reliable when protocol is standardized

Advantages:

  • Maximal muscle effort across entire ROM

  • Very sensitive measurement

  • Excellent for rehab progression

  • Good for return-to-sport decisions

  • Can detect muscle imbalances

  • Allows testing eccentric, concentric, and isometric modes


SECTION 3 — PHYSIOLOGY: WHY TORQUE CHANGES WITH JOINT ANGLE

You MUST understand this for graph questions.

3.1 Torque is NOT constant across ROM

Torque depends on:

  • Muscle length

  • Lever arm length

  • Joint angle

  • Mechanical advantage

Muscles create the most torque at mid-range, where:

  • Actin–myosin overlap is optimal

  • The lever arm is longest

  • The muscle is neither too stretched nor too shortened

Torque is weakest at:

  • Beginning of ROM (muscle too stretched)

  • End of ROM (muscle too shortened)

This creates the classic bell-shaped torque curve in concentric testing.


SECTION 4 — SPEED MATTERS: VELOCITY–TORQUE RELATIONSHIP

This is one of the MOST tested concepts.

4.1 At slow speeds (e.g., 60°/sec)

  • You produce more torque

  • This is a strength test

  • Muscles can develop maximum force at slow speeds

4.2 At moderate speeds (120°/sec)

  • Less torque than 60°/sec

  • Measures strength + power

4.3 At high speeds (180–300°/sec)

  • Torque decreases

  • Measures muscular endurance or “power-endurance”

  • Good for return-to-sport

Exam summary phrase:
“As speed increases, peak torque decreases.”

This is ALWAYS true in concentric testing.


SECTION 5 — COMMON ISOKINETIC MODES

5.1 Concentric-Concentric

Example: quadriceps + hamstrings
Most common clinical mode.

5.2 Concentric-Eccentric

Used in ACL rehab to test:

  • Concentric quadriceps

  • Eccentric hamstrings (important for deceleration)

5.3 Eccentric-Eccentric

Dangerous for beginners; high forces.

5.4 Isometric

Not technically “isokinetic,” but machines can measure static torque at specific joint angles.


SECTION 6 — NORMAL VALUES & COMMON RATIOS (NEED TO KNOW)

6.1 H:Q Ratio (Hamstrings:Quadriceps)

Healthy ratio:

  • 0.55–0.80 depending on speed

  • Lower ratio → quad dominance → ACL risk

  • Higher ratio → hamstring > quad strength (rare)

Exams LOVE these:

  • At 60°/sec → H:Q ≈ 0.5–0.6

  • At 180°/sec → H:Q ≈ 0.7–0.8

Why it increases at higher speeds:
Hamstrings have better performance at higher speeds due to muscle fiber composition and joint mechanics.


SECTION 7 — PEAK TORQUE

Definition:

The highest torque produced across ROM at a given speed.

Where it usually occurs:

Mid-range of movement.

Why it matters:

  • Indicates maximal strength capability

  • Compares limb dominance

  • Tracks rehab progress


SECTION 8 — TORQUE CURVES (MOST IMPORTANT FOR EXAM)

8.1 Concentric torque curve

Usually bell-shaped due to:

  • Suboptimal force at start/end

  • Optimal overlap & lever arm at mid-ROM

If the curve is flat or erratic:

→ poor effort
→ pain inhibition
→ mechanical issues
→ incorrect machine setup

8.2 Eccentric torque curve

Higher torque overall:

  • Eccentric can produce 20–40% more force

  • Curve may look spikier due to stretch-reflex involvement


SECTION 9 — WHAT IS RELIABILITY IN ISOKINETIC TESTING?

Your professor will probably ask this.

Isokinetics are reliable IF:

  • Joint axis is aligned correctly

  • Straps are tight

  • Warm-up is standardized

  • Instructions are consistent

  • Velocities are correct

  • Limb stabilization is proper

Within-day reliability is excellent.
Between-day reliability is good if standardized.


SECTION 10 — COMMON SOURCES OF ERROR

These ALWAYS show up in exam questions.

10.1 Misalignment

If the machine axis doesn’t match the joint axis → torque error.

10.2 Poor stabilization

If the trunk or hips move → momentum helps → torque inflated.

10.3 Lack of warm-up

Underestimates strength.

10.4 Pain inhibition

Reduces torque output.

10.5 Learning effect

First rep may be poor → always warm up first.

10.6 Velocity mismatch

Incorrect speed setting = incorrect interpretation.

10.7 Gravity correction errors

Particularly important for knee extension testing.


SECTION 11 — EXAM INTERPRETATION QUESTIONS YOU MUST KNOW

11.1 “What does a higher peak torque at 60°/sec mean?”

→ Higher maximal strength.

11.2 “Why is torque lower at higher speeds?”

→ Force–velocity relationship of muscle.

11.3 “Subject produces inconsistent torque curves. What happened?”

  • Poor effort

  • Pain

  • Fatigue

  • Stabilization errors

  • Misalignment

11.4 “Why is eccentric torque higher than concentric torque?”

→ Cross-bridge mechanics + stretch reflex + lower ATP cost.

11.5 “Athlete shows low H:Q ratio. What does that indicate?”

→ Quad dominance → increased ACL injury risk.

11.6 “Why test multiple speeds?”

→ Different speeds = different qualities (strength, power, endurance).


PUTTING IT ALL TOGETHER: WHAT YOUR PROFESSOR WANTS YOU TO UNDERSTAND

  1. Isokinetic testing is the gold standard for objective strength assessment.

  2. Torque varies across ROM because of muscle length + lever mechanics.

  3. Speed controls force production via force–velocity relationship.

  4. Proper alignment + stabilization are CRITICAL for accurate results.

  5. Peak torque is the primary output to compare limbs.

  6. H:Q ratio is extremely important in knee testing.

  7. Torque curves provide insight into effort, pain, or joint function.

  8. Testing multiple speeds assesses strength → power → endurance.