political science: the study of political using the scientific method
qualitative: descriptive
ex. political cartoons, speeches, observations, etc.
quantitative: numerical
ex. charts, graphs, statistics, etc.
correlation: an association between variables
ex. less violence → better value of life
causation: one variable that causes another
ex. eating too many gummy bears→ you getting a stomach ache
empirical: factually-supported
normative: belief- based
political system: the laws, idea, and procedure that address authority and the relationship between the population and the government
democratic political systems: | authoritarian political systems: |
people have the power | the leader has all the power |
state: political organizations that govern a set amount of land, have a permanent population, and international recognition
sovereignty: the monopoly over a piece of land in which they can use force in a said territory
government: the set of institutions legally empowered to make state’s decisions
regime: the fundamental rules that control access to power
typically endure from government to government
ex. a regime does not change each time a president or political party changes
nation: a group of people w/ commonalities
these might include language, race, religion, etc.
democratic regimes: a government with independent branches (for checks and balances)
dahl’s definition of democracy:
essential conditions:
sovercontrol of military and police by elected officials (sovereignty)
national agreement on democratic beliefs
no strong foreign control that is hostile to the country’s democracy
favorable conditions:
a modern market economy and society
weak subculture pluralism (no strong cultural or belief divides in the nation)
liberal democracy: the ideal democracy (*has the traits listed above*)
illiberal democracy: a democracy that had authoritarian characteristics
authoritarian regimes: a government that is highly centralized and in which power is maintained by repression
factors that indicated the degree of democracy or authoritarianism of states:
the degree of governance by law and not by arbitrary decisions
the degree of state influence or control on the media
the degree of free and fair elections
the degree of government transparency
the degree of citizen participation in government
totalitarianism: a government who seeks to acquire TOTAL control over all aspects of a political system and social systems
transitional democracy: an authoritarian government becoming and instituting democracy
democratization: authoritarian → democratic
more fairness in elections
increased citizen participation in government
universal suffrage
governmental transparency
protection of civil rights
equal treatment of citizen
establishment of the rule of law
democratic consolidation: a democratic regime that is very unlikely to revert to authoritarianism w/o an external shock
how do autocrats come to power→ cold war vs. today
cold war:
only 10% came to power through the decay of democracy
60% came to power through coups
authoritarian government were controlled by parties
ends through mostly coups but also popular revolts
today:
40% came to power through the decay of democracy
authoritarian governments are more commonly ruled by a single person
ends through coups but majority popular revolts
power vs. authority
-the ability to do something -the right to do something
changes in authority:
how a regime maintain sovereignty is representative of their democratic/authoritarian values
regimes change either incrementally or suddenly
governments change more frequently than regimes
revolutions and coups d’etat
federal system:
where power is centralized but also subnational/regional
unitary system:
where power is centralized and regional governments don’t have power
federal vs. unitary
-Russia -UK
-Nigeria -Iran
-Mexico -China
devolution: decentralization of government (power-based)
devolution → unitary government
unitary governments can that the power back after devolution while federal governments cannot
the delegation of power to lower levels of gov.
legitimacy: whether or not a government’s constituents believe their government had the right to use power in the way they do
whether or not a government has authority and/or power
varies from country to country
sustaining legitimacy:
policy effectiveness: how well a government responds to its people’s wants and need using policies
tradition: the people’s identity might rely on tradition so supporting that sustains legitimacy
peacefulness: transfer of powers and resolution of conflicts peacefully is necessary to sustain legitimacy
political stability (STABILITY IS ABOUT POWER): the ability of a government to maintains it’s current regime
internal actors that can bolster or undermine political stability:
contrasting methods to combat political corruption
ex. checks and balances, free media, enforcement of law, etc.
state responses to separatist groups (mostly Iran, Mexico, and Nigeria)
how does the state respond to threats?
if the state is effective, they can boost political stability.
state responses to mass protest movements that oppose government policies or their equal enforcement
in general, protests are good for political stability in order to release the public’s pressure
a government (whether democratic or authoritarian) does not want their people’s anger to build up too much
overall, governments want to limit the influence of divisive and violent actors in their countries (partially to improve global economic growth).
1governments that don’t have political stability, don’t have global strength economically
foreign governments and companies do not want to invest in countries with uncertain futures
HOWEVER, protests can lead to political reform, leading to an increase in political stability
better government-public relations