Unit 3 Week 1 Notes — Either-Or Decisions, Costs & Economic Profit

Introduction & Course Context

  • Week 1 of Unit 3: “Doing the Best You Can – Scarcity, Well-Being & Working Hours.”

    • Purpose: lay conceptual groundwork before tackling the more complex consumer-choice models scheduled for next week.

    • Assigned textbook reading this week: Sections 3.1 & 3.2 only.

    • Core themes introduced: scarcity, choice, rational consumer behaviour, different modes of decision-making, and the interplay of preferences with budget constraints.

Key Economic Principles Refreshed

  • Scarcity forces individuals and firms to make choices.

  • Optimal decision-making occurs where what we want (preferences) meets what we can afford (budget constraint).

  • The rational consumer framework helps predict or prescribe “good” choices.

  • Today’s lecture = simplified version that will be generalized next week (dynamic settings, movable constraints, richer preference maps).

Two Types of Decisions (Preview)

  • Either-Or decisions (today’s focus).

  • “How-Much” or marginal decisions (coming later).

Either-Or Decisions

  • Definition: A finite set of discrete alternatives; you must pick one.

  • Familiar life examples:
    • Go back to school vs. keep working.
    • Eat out vs. cook at home.
    • Get married vs. remain single, etc.

  • Analytical recipe:

    1. List costs & benefits for each option.

    2. Convert all costs into explicit+implicit\text{explicit} + \text{implicit} dollar terms.

    3. Compute economic profit for at least one option; sign (+/–) is enough to identify the preferred choice when only two alternatives are present.

    4. Pick the option with positive economic profit. If both positive, choose the higher; if both negative, choose the “least-bad” (closest to zero) or reconsider additional options.

Cost Vocabulary

  • Explicit Cost: direct, out-of-pocket monetary expenditure (e.g., tuition, rent, wages paid).

  • Implicit Cost: opportunity cost of the next-best alternative that is not chosen; denominated in \ even if no cash changes hands.

  • Accounting Profit: RevenueExplicit Cost\text{Revenue}-\text{Explicit Cost} (what a bookkOpportunity Cost:
    Opportunity Cost=Explicit Cost+Implicit Cost\text{Opportunity Cost}=\text{Explicit Cost}+\text{Implicit Cost}

  • Reminder: do not ignore implicit cost; both components matter.

Profit Vocabulary

  • Generic formula: Profit=RevenueCost\text{Profit}=\text{Revenue}-\text{Cost}

  • eeper reports).

  • Economic Profit: Revenue(Explicit+Implicit)=RevenueOpportunity Cost\text{Revenue}-\big(\text{Explicit}+\text{Implicit}\big)=\text{Revenue}-\text{Opportunity Cost}.

  • Decision rule for either-or: choose the option with positive economic profit.

Worked Example 1 – Latoya’s Business Idea vs. Her Job

  • Current job salary: 4000040\,000 per year.

  • If she starts a business she must:
    • Rent workspace: 1000010\,000
    • Buy supplies: 50005\,000
    • Hire employee: 2000020\,000

  • Expected business revenue: 5000050\,000

  • Step-by-step:
    • Explicit Cost =10000+5000+20000=35000=10\,000+5\,000+20\,000=35\,000
    • Implicit Cost =40000=40\,000 (foregone salary)
    • Opportunity Cost =35000+40000=75000=35\,000+40\,000=75\,000
    • Accounting Profit =5000035000=15000=50\,000-35\,000=15\,000
    • Economic Profit =5000075000=25000=50\,000-75\,000=-25\,000 (lecture verbally cites –$2,500; correct arithmetic is –$25,000—either way negative).

  • Decision: Stay in current job (positive economic profit of job vs. negative for business).

  • Insight: with only two choices, calculating one economic profit (business) suffices; the other must be of opposite sign.

Capital & Its Implicit Cost

  • Capital = total value of physical & financial assets owned by an individual or firm.
    • Physical: real estate, machinery, computers.
    • Financial: savings, bonds, stock holdings.

  • Key pitfall: If you own the capital you intend to use, still include its implicit cost (income/value you forgo by not deploying it elsewhere).
    Implicit Cost of Owned Capital=Income the capital could earn elsewhere\text{Implicit Cost of Owned Capital}=\text{Income the capital could earn elsewhere}

Worked Example 2 – Latoya Owns Capital & Uses Husband’s Labor

  • New scenario:
    • Latoya owns suitable space (market rental value 1000010\,000).
    • Husband will work for “free,” but currently earns 2000020\,000 elsewhere.
    • Supplies still cost 50005\,000.

  • Costs recast:
    • Explicit Cost =5000=5\,000 (supplies only).
    • Implicit Cost =40000+10000+20000=70000=40\,000+10\,000+20\,000=70\,000 (Latoya’s forgone salary + foregone rent + husband’s forgone salary).
    • Opportunity Cost unchanged =75000=75\,000.

  • Economic Profit with same 5000050\,000 revenue remains 25000-25\,000Still a bad idea.

  • Takeaway: shifting who owns or supplies resources just moves terms between “explicit” and “implicit” columns; total opportunity cost—and thus the decision—can remain identical.

Extending Either-Or to More Than Two Options

  • Procedure:

    1. Evaluate any two alternatives; discard the one with negative economic profit.

    2. Compare the surviving option to a third choice.

    3. Repeat until all possibilities considered; final survivor has the highest (positive) economic profit.

Worked Example 3 – Adding the Stay-At-Home Parent Option

  • Third alternative: Latoya becomes a stay-at-home mom.
    • Valued home production/ savings: 4500045\,000
    • Forgone salary remains 4000040\,000 (implicit cost).

  • Economic Profit:
    4500040000=+500045\,000-40\,000=+5\,000

  • Comparing:
    • Job: economic profit =0=0 (implicit because her opportunity cost equals salary).
    • Home business: 25000-25\,000.
    Best choice = stay-at-home mom (highest positive economic profit).

Ethical & Practical Reflections

  • Implicit valuation (e.g., value of parenting, use of an extra room) depends on personal or societal context; economists translate these into $$ for analytical clarity, which may spark philosophical debate.

  • Recognizing opportunity costs helps avoid “free-resource” fallacies (believing owned capital or family labor is costless).

  • Applying economic-profit logic to household decisions underscores the universality of economic reasoning beyond formal firms.

Looking Ahead

  • Today: foundational logic for discrete choice (either-or).

  • Next week:
    • “How-much” (marginal) decision-making.
    • Introducing indifference curves, budget lines, and dynamic shifts (prices, income, preferences).
    • Extending analysis to working-hours choice and well-being under scarcity.


Practical Study Tip: Before next lecture, practice enumerating explicit vs. implicit costs for personal life decisions; compute accounting vs. economic profit to solidify intuition.