Week 5 Seminar — Indigenous Justice Focus & Assessment 2 Briefing

Administrative & Housekeeping

  • Week 5 of ACM102 – officially half-way through the trimester.
  • Mid-trimester break next week; teaching pauses but lecturer remains contactable.
  • Week 5 seminar delivered from Wurundjeri land (Kulin Nation); continual encouragement for students to identify and acknowledge the custodians of their own locations.
  • Reminder that much of the continent remains unceded land; criminology has historically contributed to processes of colonisation and must now engage in critical, de-colonising work.

Assessment Task 2 – Reflective Experience Report

Overview & Rationale
  • Weighting: 20%20\% of unit grade.
  • Length: 800 words ±10%  (720!!880)800\text{ words}\ \pm10\% \;(720!\text{–}!880).
  • Due: Wed 20 Aug, 8 PM (AEST); normal leeway period applies.
  • Goal: use personal/educational/work experiences to analyse how they shape an emerging sense of professional purpose in criminology (or broader career).
Use of Generative AI
  • Permitted only for brainstorming/planning.
  • Must insert formal acknowledgement statement (link on unit site).
  • Not allowed for drafting, paraphrasing or editing final prose.
Compulsory Evidence Sources
  1. SuperStrong Career Self-Assessment
    • 6565 interest-based questions, hosted on DeakinTalent site.
    • Yields Holland Codes & narrative report you cite to justify strengths/purpose.
  2. Deakin Graduate Learning Outcomes (GLOs) – map your experiences/skills to the eight university-wide attributes.
  3. Martin H & XDyne D (2025) “You and Your Career” – Office of the Pro-Vice-Chancellor (Graduate Employment). Provides theory on career influences & decision-making.
  4. Unit materials from Weeks 1, 4 & 5 (especially around careers).
Report Structure – Four × 200200\,word Blocks
SectionFocusRequired Links
2.1 ExperiencesTwo significant personal/study/work experiences that influenced youCite "You & Your Career" concepts
2.2 StrengthsKey strengths developed; connect to experiencesUse SuperStrong results + relevant GLOs; link to potential professional roles
2.3 Emerging PurposeWhat matters to you? Causes, communities, valuesDraw on SuperStrong + lived insight; first-person voice encouraged
2.4 Next StepsTwo concrete, achievable activities in the next 1212 months (≥ 1 outside the course)Justify with Sections 2.1–2.3; be specific (dates, orgs, workshops, volunteering etc.)
Formatting & Support
  • Standard Deakin formatting (font, spacing, reference style).
  • Rubric, FAQs, exemplar videos, and recorded AT2 drop-in all on Cloud Site.
  • Lecturer available during break for clarification.
Looking Ahead – AT3
  • Research & Writing Exercise information (instructions, rubric, FAQs) already live for early planners.

Key Seminar Theme – Indigenous Peoples & the Criminal Legal System

Diversity & Country
  • AIATSIS Language Map shows hundreds of distinct First Nations language groups; no monolithic “Indigenous culture”.
  • Two concepts of "law":
    • L-O-R-E – story, custom, tradition, relational knowledge.
    • L-A-W – formal Indigenous legal systems predating colonial law by 60,000\sim60,000 years.
Class Reflection on Schooling
  • Ratings revealed spectrum from minimal ("one subject 30 yrs ago") to whole-year integrated curricula (history, daily Acknowledgements).
  • Common gaps: Stolen Generations, Indigenous astronomy/agriculture, self-determination narratives.
  • Highlights need for lifelong, context-specific learning guided by Indigenous voices.
Contemporary Criminological Issues
  1. Adult incarceration – severe over-representation.
  2. Juvenile incarceration – similar, often harsher impacts.
  3. Deaths in custody – >400 Indigenous deaths since Royal Commission (1991).
  4. Policing & Court practices – systemic bias, institutional racism, over-policing of certain communities.
  5. Historical context of colonisation: genocide, forced removal, dispossession; policing invented & deployed to enforce colonial control.
  6. Fractured relationship with CJS – rooted in ongoing harms.
Underlying Factors & Analytical Lenses
  • Culture & Tradition – need to understand to interpret behaviours, aspirations, and responses to CJS.
  • Systemic / Institutional Racism – repeatedly identified by coroners, academics, and police services themselves.
  • Political Narratives – "tough on crime" rhetoric influences legislation (e.g.
    youth bail laws, mandatory sentences).
  • Royal Commissions – powerful fact-finding but recommendations not binding; many remain unimplemented (e.g., 237237 recs from 1991 Deaths in Custody report).
Case Study: Don Dale Youth Detention Centre (NT)
  • 2016 Four Corners exposed abuses (e.g., spit hoods, tear gas, mechanical restraint).
  • 2017 Royal Commission banned spit hoods, urged systemic overhaul.
  • 2023 NT Government re-introduced spit hoods and other measures:
    • Claimed staff safety / post-COVID bio-hazards.
    • Underlying drivers: public fear, media pressure, "law-and-order" politics.
    • Highlights disconnect between evidence-based recommendations and political decision-making.
Royal Commissions & Inquiries – Key Examples
  • 1991 Royal Commission into Aboriginal Deaths in Custody: 237237 recommendations; partial uptake, yet >400 further deaths.
  • Don Dale RC (2017) – systemic abuse; many recommendations outstanding.
  • Yoorrook Justice Commission (Vic, 2024) – first truth-telling process to formally recognise genocide in Victoria; linked to treaty process and state-level Voice.
Voice to Parliament & Treaty
  • Proposed federal Voice (2023 referendum) would provide non-binding advice on legislation affecting Indigenous peoples.
  • Victorian model already operational; separate treaty negotiations underway.
  • Core principle: decisions about culture/land/law should be led by Indigenous knowledge holders.
Seminar Debate Exercise – Building Arguments

Example Statement: “Stronger laws are needed to protect Indigenous cultural heritage and sacred sites from destruction and commercial development.”

  • Arguments FOR
    • Land unceded; cultural/spiritual significance over 60,000\sim60{,}000 years.
    • Continuing destruction erodes identity, knowledge transfer, and international human-rights obligations.
    • Indigenous self-determination: protection decisions should rest with traditional owners.
  • Arguments AGAINST (used by some stakeholders)
    • Economic impact: tourism revenue, local employment, resource extraction.
    • "National interest" or infrastructure development priorities.
    • Existing Western heritage laws considered "sufficient" by opponents.
  • Pedagogical point: understanding both sides clarifies policy obstacles and informs strategising for reform.

Pedagogical & Resource Notes

  • Indigenous astronomy & agriculture = examples of advanced scientific knowledge ignored by mainstream curricula.
  • Lecturer will circulate extra readings (e.g., AIATSIS maps, Yoorrook documents, Indigenous criminology scholarship).
  • Suggested self-study:
    • Follow ABC "Back to Nature" and SBS "First Inventors" for applied cultural science.
    • Review coroner findings on systemic racism in NT Police.

Looking Ahead

  • Week 6 (after break) – Innovative & Alternative Justice models (e.g., Koori Courts, Community-led diversion, on-country programs).
  • Continuous theme: criminology’s responsibility to support de-colonising practices and resist ongoing harms.

Well-being Reminder

  • Rest during the break – reflection is impossible without recovery.
  • Use downtime to complete SuperStrong, read AT2 resources, and process complex Indigenous justice material at a respectful pace.