Week 5 Seminar — Indigenous Justice Focus & Assessment 2 Briefing
Administrative & Housekeeping
- Week 5 of ACM102 – officially half-way through the trimester.
- Mid-trimester break next week; teaching pauses but lecturer remains contactable.
- Week 5 seminar delivered from Wurundjeri land (Kulin Nation); continual encouragement for students to identify and acknowledge the custodians of their own locations.
- Reminder that much of the continent remains unceded land; criminology has historically contributed to processes of colonisation and must now engage in critical, de-colonising work.
Assessment Task 2 – Reflective Experience Report
Overview & Rationale
- Weighting: of unit grade.
- Length: .
- Due: Wed 20 Aug, 8 PM (AEST); normal leeway period applies.
- Goal: use personal/educational/work experiences to analyse how they shape an emerging sense of professional purpose in criminology (or broader career).
Use of Generative AI
- Permitted only for brainstorming/planning.
- Must insert formal acknowledgement statement (link on unit site).
- Not allowed for drafting, paraphrasing or editing final prose.
Compulsory Evidence Sources
- SuperStrong Career Self-Assessment
- interest-based questions, hosted on DeakinTalent site.
- Yields Holland Codes & narrative report you cite to justify strengths/purpose.
- Deakin Graduate Learning Outcomes (GLOs) – map your experiences/skills to the eight university-wide attributes.
- Martin H & XDyne D (2025) “You and Your Career” – Office of the Pro-Vice-Chancellor (Graduate Employment). Provides theory on career influences & decision-making.
- Unit materials from Weeks 1, 4 & 5 (especially around careers).
Report Structure – Four × word Blocks
| Section | Focus | Required Links |
|---|---|---|
| 2.1 Experiences | Two significant personal/study/work experiences that influenced you | Cite "You & Your Career" concepts |
| 2.2 Strengths | Key strengths developed; connect to experiences | Use SuperStrong results + relevant GLOs; link to potential professional roles |
| 2.3 Emerging Purpose | What matters to you? Causes, communities, values | Draw on SuperStrong + lived insight; first-person voice encouraged |
| 2.4 Next Steps | Two concrete, achievable activities in the next months (≥ 1 outside the course) | Justify with Sections 2.1–2.3; be specific (dates, orgs, workshops, volunteering etc.) |
Formatting & Support
- Standard Deakin formatting (font, spacing, reference style).
- Rubric, FAQs, exemplar videos, and recorded AT2 drop-in all on Cloud Site.
- Lecturer available during break for clarification.
Looking Ahead – AT3
- Research & Writing Exercise information (instructions, rubric, FAQs) already live for early planners.
Key Seminar Theme – Indigenous Peoples & the Criminal Legal System
Diversity & Country
- AIATSIS Language Map shows hundreds of distinct First Nations language groups; no monolithic “Indigenous culture”.
- Two concepts of "law":
- L-O-R-E – story, custom, tradition, relational knowledge.
- L-A-W – formal Indigenous legal systems predating colonial law by years.
Class Reflection on Schooling
- Ratings revealed spectrum from minimal ("one subject 30 yrs ago") to whole-year integrated curricula (history, daily Acknowledgements).
- Common gaps: Stolen Generations, Indigenous astronomy/agriculture, self-determination narratives.
- Highlights need for lifelong, context-specific learning guided by Indigenous voices.
Contemporary Criminological Issues
- Adult incarceration – severe over-representation.
- Juvenile incarceration – similar, often harsher impacts.
- Deaths in custody – >400 Indigenous deaths since Royal Commission (1991).
- Policing & Court practices – systemic bias, institutional racism, over-policing of certain communities.
- Historical context of colonisation: genocide, forced removal, dispossession; policing invented & deployed to enforce colonial control.
- Fractured relationship with CJS – rooted in ongoing harms.
Underlying Factors & Analytical Lenses
- Culture & Tradition – need to understand to interpret behaviours, aspirations, and responses to CJS.
- Systemic / Institutional Racism – repeatedly identified by coroners, academics, and police services themselves.
- Political Narratives – "tough on crime" rhetoric influences legislation (e.g.
youth bail laws, mandatory sentences). - Royal Commissions – powerful fact-finding but recommendations not binding; many remain unimplemented (e.g., recs from 1991 Deaths in Custody report).
Case Study: Don Dale Youth Detention Centre (NT)
- 2016 Four Corners exposed abuses (e.g., spit hoods, tear gas, mechanical restraint).
- 2017 Royal Commission banned spit hoods, urged systemic overhaul.
- 2023 NT Government re-introduced spit hoods and other measures:
- Claimed staff safety / post-COVID bio-hazards.
- Underlying drivers: public fear, media pressure, "law-and-order" politics.
- Highlights disconnect between evidence-based recommendations and political decision-making.
Royal Commissions & Inquiries – Key Examples
- 1991 Royal Commission into Aboriginal Deaths in Custody: recommendations; partial uptake, yet >400 further deaths.
- Don Dale RC (2017) – systemic abuse; many recommendations outstanding.
- Yoorrook Justice Commission (Vic, 2024) – first truth-telling process to formally recognise genocide in Victoria; linked to treaty process and state-level Voice.
Voice to Parliament & Treaty
- Proposed federal Voice (2023 referendum) would provide non-binding advice on legislation affecting Indigenous peoples.
- Victorian model already operational; separate treaty negotiations underway.
- Core principle: decisions about culture/land/law should be led by Indigenous knowledge holders.
Seminar Debate Exercise – Building Arguments
Example Statement: “Stronger laws are needed to protect Indigenous cultural heritage and sacred sites from destruction and commercial development.”
- Arguments FOR
- Land unceded; cultural/spiritual significance over years.
- Continuing destruction erodes identity, knowledge transfer, and international human-rights obligations.
- Indigenous self-determination: protection decisions should rest with traditional owners.
- Arguments AGAINST (used by some stakeholders)
- Economic impact: tourism revenue, local employment, resource extraction.
- "National interest" or infrastructure development priorities.
- Existing Western heritage laws considered "sufficient" by opponents.
- Pedagogical point: understanding both sides clarifies policy obstacles and informs strategising for reform.
Pedagogical & Resource Notes
- Indigenous astronomy & agriculture = examples of advanced scientific knowledge ignored by mainstream curricula.
- Lecturer will circulate extra readings (e.g., AIATSIS maps, Yoorrook documents, Indigenous criminology scholarship).
- Suggested self-study:
- Follow ABC "Back to Nature" and SBS "First Inventors" for applied cultural science.
- Review coroner findings on systemic racism in NT Police.
Looking Ahead
- Week 6 (after break) – Innovative & Alternative Justice models (e.g., Koori Courts, Community-led diversion, on-country programs).
- Continuous theme: criminology’s responsibility to support de-colonising practices and resist ongoing harms.
Well-being Reminder
- Rest during the break – reflection is impossible without recovery.
- Use downtime to complete SuperStrong, read AT2 resources, and process complex Indigenous justice material at a respectful pace.