Gunboat Diplomacy, Panama,
Gunboat Diplomacy, Panama, and the New World Policeman
Theodore Roosevelt's Perspective
Claim of Strength
Roosevelt asserts the U.S. as a powerful entity on the global stage.
Emphasis on American vigor and future prospects similar to a strong man preparing for a race.
Indicates determination to take action rather than merely discuss issues.
Decisive Leadership
Roosevelt took control over the Panama Canal project without waiting for Congressional approval.
Emergence of the U.S. in International Politics
Post-Spanish American War
Rise of the United States as a key player in international diplomacy.
The Western Hemisphere represented opportunities for the U.S. in various sectors, particularly economic ventures.
Benevolent Paternalism
U.S. policy towards Latin America characterized as protective but controversial, leading to increasing resentment.
Enforcement of the Monroe Doctrine
U.S. Naval Expansion
Prevention of European Influence
U.S. aimed to assert control in Latin America, particularly to keep European powers at bay.
Roosevelt advocated for constructing a powerful navy, linking naval strength to national security.
Great White Fleet
In 1907, Roosevelt’s fleet demonstrated U.S. naval capabilities by embarking on a world tour to showcase naval power and reinforce U.S. influence.
Controversy in Latin America
Venezuelan Debt Crisis (1902)
U.S. defended against European blockade actions regarding Venezuela's unpaid debts.
Roosevelt viewed European intervention as an unacceptable violation of U.S. interests.
Argentine Minister Drago proposed the Drago Doctrine to prevent European military intervention for debt collections, which ultimately was overshadowed by Roosevelt's Corollary.
The Panama Canal Negotiations
Background of Canal Discussions
Historical Treaties
The U.S. signed the Bidlack-Mallarino Treaty in 1846 with Colombia, securing transit rights across Panama.
The Clayton-Bulwer Treaty (1850) restricted unilateral U.S. action regarding canal construction.
French Canal Efforts
French Attempt (1879)
Ferdinand de Lesseps, the designer of the Suez Canal, initiated the French canal in Panama but faced insurmountable challenges leading to failure.
U.S. Interest in Panama
Shift from Nicaragua to Panama
Despite Nicaragua being a more viable option, political and strategic reasons led the U.S. to favor Panama after the French retreated.
President Roosevelt sought to secure a treaty with Colombia.
Hay-Herrán Treaty
Proposed Agreement
The Hay-Herrán Treaty aimed for the U.S. to lease land for the canal but was rejected by Colombia, leading to U.S. frustrations.
Revolutionary Support
Philippe Bunau-Varilla supported the idea of an independent Panama, fostering a revolution to facilitate U.S. interests in canal construction.
Creation of Panama
Panamanian Independence
U.S. Navy Involvement
The U.S. Navy's presence, particularly the USS Nashville, ensured that Colombian reinforcements could not land, aiding the success of Panamanian independence on November 3, 1903.
Immediate U.S. Recognition
The U.S. quickly recognized Panama, leading to the Hay-Bunau-Varilla Treaty, granting the U.S. a ten-mile-wide canal zone.
The Roosevelt Corollary to the Monroe Doctrine
Redefining Foreign Policy
Justification for Intervention
Roosevelt's Corollary established the U.S. as the enforcer of stability in Latin America, legitimizing interventions to maintain order and collect debts.
Chronic Wrongdoing
U.S. would act to rectify cases of mismanagement or wrongdoings by Latin American nations that could invite European intervention.
U.S. Military Interventions
Precedent for Increase
Roosevelt's policies set a precedent for frequent U.S. military interventions across Latin America, with numerous engagements in countries like Colombia, Panama, and Nicaragua.
Continuation under Successors
Subsequent presidents upheld Roosevelt’s interventionist policies, marking a notable period of U.S. military presence in Latin America through the early 20th century.
Conclusion
Long-Term Implication
The aggressive U.S. policies towards Latin America laid down by Roosevelt had lasting impacts, leading to distrust among Latin American nations and prompting discussions for a change in approach in subsequent decades.