(18) Dr Tahu Kukutai, Te Ritorito 2017: 'Understanding indigenous data sovereignty'
Introduction
The speaker humorously addresses the surprise of being designated keynote speaker and turns the focus to a colleague.
Expresses a passion for data and its importance to discussions at the event.
The Data Landscape
Data Ubiquity
Data is pervasive in modern life, with an exponential increase in data availability.
Healthcare data has doubled over two years; human genome scans doubled in just seven months.
Personal Data Collection
Devices such as smartphones and Fitbits collect personal health data.
Concerns over patient-doctor privacy, likening personal health data sharing to publishing a medical autobiography.
Internet of Things (IoT)
Everyday devices (fridges, phones, buildings) collect and can share data.
Example: Facebook has 1.8 billion users, reflecting significant data capture of personal preferences.
Companies use social media data to create detailed consumer profiles targeting behaviors and influence decisions (e.g., purchases, voting).
Historical Context of Data Collection
Historical Data Practices
Data collected historically often reflected governmental motives for control, surveillance, and resource extraction.
Reference to the origins of the census in ancient civilizations related to taxation and labor.
Indigenous Peoples and Data Collection
Indigenous experiences with state-controlled data collection have been fraught, often used for assimilation or economic incorporation.
Māori data has frequently been manipulated by governmental narratives about gaps in social services.
Current Innovations and Issues
Data Sharing Initiatives
Discussion on the Prime Minister’s push for better data sharing among government, NGOs, and private sectors.
Data Futures Partnership aims to unlock economic and social data value in New Zealand.
Concerns Regarding Data Perspectives
Caution against blind faith in data and data experts.
Emphasizes that data points reflect contextual realities rather than absolute truths.
Challenges for Māori in Data Practices
Data Misinterpretation
Historical and ongoing narrative framing Māori as problems needing intervention.
Criteria for intervention often framed by government priorities over indigenous needs.
Integrated Data Infrastructure (IDI)
IDI enables linking of diverse data sources but operates without full public awareness.
Critiques the absence of a unique identifier for tracking individuals like in Nordic countries.
Trust and Governance Issues
Trust, once broken, is hard to regain, especially regarding indigenous data rights.
Importance of robust Māori data governance - representative and protective.
Risks of Unchecked Data Practices
Risks include potential harm to indigenous communities from poorly governed data practices.
Emphasis on ensuring data practices are inclusive and accountable.
Conclusion
Urges for meaningful participation, protection, and partnership in data governance.
Without proper mechanisms, the data revolution may exacerbate, rather than alleviate, existing challenges for Māori.