elementary psych 9-3

Correlational Research

  • Definition: measures two or more variables to assess whether they are associated; no manipulation of variables.
  • Core idea: correlation does not imply causation; an association between variables does not prove one causes the other.
  • Key metric: correlation coefficient rr ranges from 1-1 to 11; r=0r=0 indicates no correlation; positive r>0 means both variables increase together; negative r<0 means one increases while the other decreases.
  • Graph directions:
    • Positive correlation: both increase together.
    • Negative correlation: one increases as the other decreases.
    • No correlation: no predictable pattern.
  • Third-variable problem: apparent correlation can be due to a third variable (confound) not accounted for.
  • Example concepts from lecture:
    • Height vs reading level shows a positive correlation but is likely driven by age/grade level as a third variable.
    • Ice cream sales vs homicide rates (common example for illustrating correlation without causation).
  • Important takeaway: correlations show relationships, not causality; beware spurious correlations.

Experimental Research

  • Definition: scientific procedure where one or more variables are manipulated and then measured to assess cause-effect.
  • Key terms:
    • Independent Variable (IV): the variable that is deliberately manipulated.
    • Dependent Variable (DV): the outcome that is measured.
    • Control group: baseline condition used for comparison.
    • Experimental group: receives the manipulation of the IV.
    • Placebo: inert treatment used to control for expectations.
  • Example scenario (lecture): does wearing name-brand shoes affect basketball performance? IV = shoe brand; DV = basketball scores; Control group uses generic shoes; Experimental group uses name-brand shoes; Placebo control possible for expectations.
  • Data collection and inference: after manipulation, conduct statistical analysis to determine if differences between groups are likely not due to chance.
  • For exams: you don’t need to know specific statistical tests; focus on the idea that you test for significance of group differences.

Random Assignment and Experimental Controls

  • Random assignment: each participant has an equal chance of being in the experimental or control group, helping ensure groups are comparable.
  • Why it’s important: helps ensure observed effects are due to the IV, not preexisting differences.
  • Fair assignment caveats: avoid systematic bias (e.g., grouping by gender, seating location) that could confound results.

Biases, Demand Characteristics, and Placebo Effects

  • Biases: factors that systematically affect performance (e.g., time of day, temperature, fatigue) and can skew results.
  • Demand characteristics: cues that reveal the researcher’s expectations, causing participants to alter their behavior.
  • Placebo effect: improvements due to participants’ expectations rather than the active treatment.
  • Remedies:
    • Use placebo controls where appropriate.
    • Implement double-blind designs to reduce both participant and experimenter expectancy effects.
    • Ensure procedures minimize cues about expected outcomes.

Double-Blind Studies

  • Definition: both participants and data-collectors are unaware of treatment assignments.
  • Structure: one researcher knows group assignments (unblinded) but does not collect data; all others collect data blind to conditions.
  • Goal: reduce bias in data collection and analysis; blind is removed only after data collection is complete.

Quick Check: Practice Question

  • Scenario: Previous research indicates students learn more when engaging in group activities rather than individual work.
    • Independent Variable (IV): the group condition (group activities vs individual work).
    • Dependent Variable (DV): learning outcomes or scores.
  • Answer: IV = group condition; DV = learning outcomes/scores.

Summary Concepts

  • Correlational vs Experimental:
    • Correlational: measure associations, no manipulation; cannot infer causation.
    • Experimental: manipulate IV, measure DV; supports causal conclusions under proper controls.
  • Key controls and biases:
    • Random assignment, control group, placebo, double-blind design.
    • Be mindful of time-of-day, environmental factors, and demand characteristics.