• Definition of ethical conflict: tension between what one wants to do vs. what is ethically right.
• Definition of ethical dilemma: clash of differing ethical principles/values.
• Professional ethics = morality + social norms + role‐specific parameters.
• AMA – Principles of Medical Ethics.
• APA – Principles of Medical Ethics with Annotations Especially Applicable to Psychiatry.
• Both exhort:
– Use scientific techniques.
– Self-regulate misconduct.
– Respect rights of patients, families, colleagues, society.
Respect for Autonomy
• Requires intentional action + adequate information + time.
• Includes right to delegate decision‐making (guardian, proxy).
• Example: psychotic young adult refusing antipsychotics—negotiated respect → eventually accepted meds.
Beneficence
• Fiduciary duty to act for patient & society.
• Paternalism:
– Weak: patient lacks autonomy.
– Strong: overrides intact autonomy for substantial harm prevention.
Non-maleficence
• “First, do no harm.”
• Adequate training, second opinions, active risk avoidance.
Justice
• Fair distribution of benefits/burdens; reward/punishment.
• Resource allocation models: greatest need vs. greatest individual impact vs. greatest societal impact.
Sexual boundary violations.
Non-sexual boundary violations.
Confidentiality breaches.
Mistreatment (incompetence, double agency).
Illegal activities (insurance fraud, insider trading, etc.).
• Sex with a patient = unethical + illegal (rape, assault, battery, malpractice).
• Insurers exclude coverage.
• “Once a patient, always a patient” vs. time-limited prohibition—APA holds: sexual activity with current OR former patient always unethical (extends to family).
• Example: CA psychiatrist had 7-year affair, group sex, prescriptions → license revoked & fraud conviction.
• Boundary-crossing ≠ violation unless exploitative / meets clinician’s needs at patient expense.
• Gift example: resident refused scarf → patient attempted suicide → need to explore meaning.
• Freud cigar anecdote—accepted gift then analyzed motive.
• Categories:
– Business: avoid business with patient/family; rural exceptions handled cautiously.
– Ideological: treatment decisions mustn't be swayed by clinician’s beliefs.
– Social: avoid friendships; don’t treat social friends (except emergency).
– Financial: fees, missed appointments, sliding scale, resentment, transparency.
• Therapist duty; patient holds privilege in court.
• Violations harm trust, violate non-maleficence, and can be overridden for protection (duty to warn/report, child abuse, impaired professional).
• Endures after death; subpoena ≠ automatic release—judge can review in-camera.
• Teaching/research: disclose only necessary info, de-identify if possible.
• Psychiatrists must:
– Disclose all treatment options (even if not covered).
– Appeal denials.
– Continue emergency treatment.
– Cooperate w/ utilization review w/ patient authorization.
• Case: Dr. A hides improvement to keep pt inpatient — deception harms trust, future care, policy reform; appeals preferable.
• Causes: psychiatric/medical disorders, substance use.
• Ethical duty to report; State boards & physician-health programs.
• Treater should not monitor; independent monitor required.
• Delegation only with adequate supervision.
• Patients must know level of trainee.
• Trainees must know limits & seek help.
• Primacy of patient welfare.
• Patient autonomy.
• Social justice.
• Lifelong competence.
• Honesty & error disclosure.
• Confidentiality.
• Maintain appropriate relations.
• Improve quality/access & allocate finite resources fairly.
• Manage conflicts of interest, self-regulate profession.
• Retirement ≠ abandonment if notice & referral.
• Bequests: accepting estate unethical; token gift possibly OK.
• Vaginal exams OK only if competent & doesn’t distort transference.
• Post-mortem confidentiality survives.
• Reporting: duty but assess risk/benefit; child abuse mandatory.
• No absolute confidentiality under military code → may deter care; suicide rates spark calls for reform; many clinicians exercise discretion.
• Civil tort of negligence; 4 Ds = Duty, Deviation, Damage, Direct causation.
• Expert testimony + guidelines establish standard of care.
• Intentional torts (battery, fraud) not covered by insurance.
Negligent Prescription
• Exceeding doses, polypharmacy, wrong indications, lack of disclosure, failure to monitor.
• Informed consent each med change; visits ≤ 6-month intervals at maximum.
Split Treatment
• Medication by psychiatrist + therapy by non-MD.
• Psychiatrist retains full responsibility; must communicate, hospitalize if needed.
• Fragmented care = substandard; malpractice trap.
• Privilege: legal right (patient) to withhold testimony.
• Jaffee v. Redmond (1996) federal psychotherapist–patient privilege.
• Military courts: no privilege.
• Subpoena duces tecum: produce records; can seek in-camera review.
• Tardive dyskinesia: informed consent, monitoring.
• Suicide: foreseeability vs. preventability; thorough assessment, precaution plan.
• Violence: Tarasoff I (1976) duty to warn; Tarasoff II (1982) duty to protect (warning, hospitalization, police, medication).
– National standard even in states without statute.
Informal (voluntary, can leave).
Voluntary formal (signed application; can leave).
Temporary (emergency, single MD, confirm within ~15 d).
Involuntary (danger to self/others; two physicians; legal rights, periods ~60 d; habeas corpus).
– Parens patriae doctrine.
• Right to treatment (Rouse v. Cameron 1966, Wyatt v. Stickney 1971).
• Right to refuse treatment except emergency (O’Connor v. Donaldson 1976; Rennie v. Klein 1979; Rogers v. Okin 1981).
• Least restrictive alternative, visitation, communication, privacy, economic (fair wages).
• Only when risk of harm & no less restrictive alternative.
• Written, time-limited orders; regular review.
• Claims often added to malpractice; minors: parent consent except for specified conditions (STD, pregnancy, substance).
• Mature minor rule, emancipated minors.
• Essential elements: diagnosis, treatment nature, risks/benefits, alternatives, prognosis.
• “Best interests.” Presumption favoring mother eroding.
• Courts may remove children (neglect/abuse).
• Testamentary capacity: know property, making bequest, natural heirs.
• Competence = task-specific; only judge decides.
• Durable power of attorney anticipates incapacity.
• Competence to stand trial: Dusky standard (consult lawyer & understand).
• Competence to be executed (Ford v. Wainwright). Ethical ban on physician participation.
Criminal Responsibility Tests
• M'Naghten (1843): unable to know nature/quality or wrongfulness.
• Irresistible impulse (policeman-at-elbow).
• Durham/Product rule (1954) – later abandoned.
• Model Penal Code (ALI): lack substantial capacity to appreciate wrongfulness OR conform conduct due to disease/defect.
• Guilty but Mentally Ill verdict = sentence + treatment.
• Emotional distress claims, concentration camp reparations.
• Recovered memory litigation – risk management principles (maintain neutrality, document, avoid suggestion).
• Worker’s compensation psych evaluations.
• Sexual exploitation civil/criminal/ethical consequences.
• Written notice of privacy practices; acknowledgment.
• Copy of records (psychotherapy notes exempt).
• Accounting of disclosures.
• Authorization required for non-routine disclosures.
• Alternative communications; complaint mechanism.
• 4Ds of malpractice: Duty, Deviation, Damage, Direct causation.
• Split-treatment malpractice risk: ensure ≤6-month med follow-up.
• Involuntary hold typical time limits: 15-day temporary; 60-day initial civil commitment.
• Balancing patient autonomy vs. beneficence/paternalism informs consent, involuntary care, deception to insurers.
• Duty to society vs. individual (justice) drives Tarasoff obligations, managed-care appeals, resource allocation.
• Confidentiality erosion (insurance, electronic records, military) challenges trust, demands transparency.
• Professionalism charter links ethics to lifelong competence, quality improvement, and social justice—embedding ethics in daily practice.
(End of Notes)