Comprehensive Study Notes: Chapter 2 – Criminal Procedure (Before Trial, During Trial, After Trial)
Stage 1: The Procedure before Trial
- Initiated by a complaint, serving as a basis for an arrest warrant or filed at an initial appearance if arrest is without a warrant.
- Arrests can be made with a warrant (requiring judicial finding of probable cause) or without a warrant (for witnessed crimes, ~95% of arrests).
- Probable cause must exist at the time of arrest and is later reviewed.
- Alternatives to arrest: Citations and summonses allow release until hearing, reducing jail time and saving police resources. Failure to appear can lead to a bench warrant.
- Bench Warrant: Court order to arrest for contempt or failure to comply.
- Miranda warnings: Required during custodial interrogation; routinely given when a suspect appears before a judge, even without questions.
- Booking and intake: Includes recording arrest details, inventorying belongings, photographing, fingerprinting, and placing in lockup/jail. Arrestees typically get a phone call and may post bail for minor offenses.
- Right to release: Citations, summonses, and Release on Recognizance (ROR) permit non-monetary release.
- Initial appearance timing: Arrestee must be brought before a judge "without unnecessary delay." Federal/some state systems scrutinize delays over 6 hours for voluntariness of statements.
- Initial appearance and rights: Arrestee is informed of rights; Miranda warnings may be given depending on jurisdiction and interrogation status.
- Bail: Security to ensure court appearance; can serve as preventive detention. The Federal Bail Reform Act of 1984 allows denial of release for serious felonies to ensure public safety (United States v. Salerno).
- Bail forms: Cash bail bonds, Release on Recognizance (ROR) for responsible defendants, citation release (no initial money, later forfeiture if no-show), and property bonds (using real estate as collateral).
- Preliminary hearing: For felonies, a magistrate determines probable cause to proceed to trial. It's a limited hearing, no guilt beyond a reasonable doubt required; defense can cross-examine, but prosecution doesn't need to present all evidence.
- Formal charges (Indictment/Information): Prosecution begins with an indictment (grand jury accusation, required for federal felonies/some state felonies) or information (prosecutor-filed, for misdemeanors).
- Grand Jury: Serves as a buffer; proceedings are secret; accused has no right to present evidence or counsel.
- Grand jury process: Prosecutor presents evidence to establish probable cause for indictment, which, due to its potential impact on reputation, involves secrecy and limited participation.
- Jury selection (Voir dire): Prospective jurors (venire) are questioned by judges (federal) or lawyers (many states) to identify grounds for challenges.
- Challenges to jurors:
- Challenge for cause: Requires a specific reason for disqualification.
- Peremptory challenge: No reason required, but limited in number (e.g., 6 for misdemeanors, 12−20 for felonies/capital cases), and can contribute to minority underrepresentation.
- Arraignment: Accused appears in court, charges are read, and a plea is requested. Failure to appear results in a bench warrant (capias). Federal arraignments ensure receipt of charges, present the charge, and request a plea.
- Plea types: Guilty, not guilty, nolo contendere (no contest), and occasionally not guilty by reason of insanity or conditional pleas.
- Nolo contendere: Accepts punishment without admitting guilt; usually not admissible in civil cases.
- Guilty plea: Waives rights to trial, confrontation, and self-incrimination.
- Alford plea: A guilty plea while maintaining innocence, used for sentence reduction, valid if it's a knowing waiver of rights (North Carolina v. Alford).
- Plea withdrawal: Allowed before court acceptance for any reason; after acceptance, only for a "fair or just reason" (e.g., if a plea agreement is rejected).
- Plea bargains: Defendant pleads guilty for concessions (lesser charge, reduced sentence, dismissed charges).
- Forms: Pleading to a lesser offense, pleading to original charge with sentence promise, or plea in exchange for dismissing other charges.
- Controversies: Debates over leniency vs. coercion; seen as essential for managing caseloads and reducing costs.
- ABA justification: Saves time/cost, avoids lengthy trials, reduces uncertainty, and lessens court burden.
- Santobello v. New York (1971): Accepted plea bargains must be enforced; if not, withdrawal is allowed.
- Legal issues: Right to counsel during bargaining, prosecutor disclosure (impeachment materials), voluntariness of pleas, and policy debates on plea bargain prohibition.
- Jurisprudential points: Sixth Amendment right to counsel applies to plea bargaining. Supreme Court cases (Santobello, Brady) guide enforceability and fairness. While full impeachment disclosure isn't always required before a plea, voluntariness is key; improper pressure invalidates a plea.
- Trial preparation: After a plea, cases advance to trial, with plea bargain terms influencing dynamics.
Stage 2: The Procedure during Trial
- Jury selection (Voir dire): Prospective jurors (venire) are questioned by judges (federal) or lawyers (many states) to identify grounds for challenges.
- Challenges: "Challenge for cause" (requires a reason) and "peremptory challenge" (no reason, limited numbers, e.g., 6 for misdemeanors, 12−20 for felonies/capital cases), which can lead to minority underrepresentation.
- Opening statements: Prosecution introduces the charge and evidence; defense may follow, or strategic timing varies by jurisdiction.
- Prosecution’s case: Presents evidence (witnesses, physical evidence). Witness examination order: direct (prosecutor), cross (defense), redirect, recross. Leading questions allowed only on cross. Rebuttal evidence may be presented.
- Defense case: Presents evidence/witnesses (direct examination by defense, cross by prosecution) or may choose not to present if prosecution's case is weak.
- Burden/Standard of proof: Prosecution must prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt; defense is not obligated to present evidence. "Reasonable doubt" is subjective.
- Closing arguments/Jury instructions: Prosecution and defense present closing arguments (order varies, prosecution often has last rebuttal). Judge instructs the jury on legal principles, elements of the offense, and the "beyond a reasonable doubt" standard. Judicial commentary on evidence varies by state.
- Jury deliberations/Verdicts: Jury deliberates in secret, electing a foreperson. Possible verdicts: guilty, not guilty (sometimes "not guilty by reason of insanity"). Unanimous conviction is generally required. Judges may sequester juries in high-profile cases.
- Hung juries/Unanimity: A hung jury (no unanimous verdict) leads to a mistrial, allowing for retrial. Ramos v. Louisiana (2020) established that the Sixth Amendment requires unanimous verdicts for serious offenses in state trials, overturning prior non-unanimous precedents.
- Jury sizes: Supreme Court rulings: 6-member juries require unanimity and are constitutional in non-death penalty cases (Burch v. Louisiana), while 5-person juries are unconstitutional (Ballew v. Georgia). Most states use 12-member juries for felonies (Williams v. Florida).
- Post-verdict: Acquittal (not guilty) means guilt wasn't proven. A guilty verdict can lead to polling the jury, motions for a new trial, appeal, or habeas corpus.
- Motions during trial: Motions for acquittal (at prosecutor's close) or directed verdict of acquittal (at evidence's close) aim to prevent wrongful conviction if the state's case is insufficient; permissible in some states.
- Jury instructions: Judges provide instructions on legal principles and proof standards; errors can lead to appeals.
- Post-trial: Foreperson reports the verdict. Jurors may discuss deliberations voluntarily; sequestration depends on case.
Stage 3: The Procedure after Trial
- Sentencing: Formal judgment after conviction, including fines, probation, jail, prison, or death.
- Sentence types: Fixed (specific term), Determinate (narrow min/max range), Indeterminate (wide min/max range).
- Bifurcated trials: Guilt and sentencing are separate stages.
- Sentencing is often postponed for Presentence Investigation Reports (PSIR), which defense can review.
- Presentence investigations (PSIR): Reports aiding judges in sentencing; defense counsel can review and challenge their contents.
- Appeals: Defendants can appeal after sentencing, often within ~30 days. Death penalty appeals may be automatic or expedited. The right to appeal is statutory, not constitutionally guaranteed.
- Habeas corpus: A petition challenging unlawful custody or constitutional rights violations during trial/imprisonment, seeking release or review; low success rate.
- Appeals vs. Habeas corpus: Appeals review trial legality/sufficiency; habeas corpus challenges confinement legality and seeks release based on constitutional grounds.
- Summary: The criminal justice process is largely national, but states vary in procedures while protecting fundamental rights. Actual practices may deviate from prescribed ones due to discretion/resources. The system balances rights, efficiency, and public safety.
Important Legal Concepts and Cases
- Probable cause: Basis for arrest/warrants.
- Miranda warnings: Required during custodial interrogation.
- Bail reform: United States v. Salerno (1987) allows pretrial detention for serious felonies.
- Grand jury/Indictment: Required for federal felonies, but not universally (Hurtado v. California, 1884).
- Sentencing: Varied standards; bifurcated trials; PSIRs.
- Jury unanimity/size: Ramos v. Louisiana (2020) requires unanimous verdicts in state felony trials. Key cases: Apodaca, Johnson, Burch, Ballew, Williams.
- Plea bargaining: Santobello v. New York (1971) enforces accepted bargains. Also North Carolina v. Alford (1970), Brady v. United States (1970), United States v. Ruiz (2002).
Connections to broader concepts
- Pretrial process: Balances speed with due process rights (counsel, fair trial, jury).
- Plea bargaining: Critical for caseload management but raises coercion/fairness concerns.
- Jury unanimity (Ramos): Shows Supreme Court's evolving constitutional interpretations and federal-state procedural interplay.
- Jurisdictional variations: Highlight discretion and policy in justice while upholding core constitutional protections.
Quick-reference stage-summary
- Stage 1 (Pre-trial): Complaint, arrest (with/without warrant), booking, bail, initial appearance, Miranda advisement, preliminary hearing, charging (indictment/information, grand jury), arraignment, pleas, plea bargaining.
- Stage 2 (Trial): Jury selection (voir dire), opening statements, evidence (prosecution/defense, examination), rebuttal, closing arguments, jury instructions, deliberations, verdicts (unanimity), motions (acquittal), post-trial aspects.
- Stage 3 (Post-trial): Sentencing (fixed/determinate/indeterminate, bifurcated), PSIR, appeals, post-conviction remedies (habeas corpus).