Characterizations of Invertible Matrices and the Invertible Matrix Theorem
Overview of the Role of Pivots in Invertibility
- The fundamental characterization of an n×n matrix A centers on its pivot positions. These pivots determine the behavior of the matrix in linear systems and transformations.
- For any square matrix A of size n×n, each of the following statements is true if and only if a specific pivot condition is met:
- Pivot in Every Column of A:
- The equation Ax=0 has only the trivial solution.
- The columns of A are linearly independent.
- The linear transformation T(x)=Ax is one-to-one.
- Pivot in Every Row of A:
- The equation Ax=b has a solution for every b in Rn.
- The columns of A span Rn.
- The linear transformation T(x)=Ax is onto.
- Special Case for Square Matrices (m=n):
- For a square matrix, having a pivot in every column is logically equivalent to having a pivot in every row. If one of these conditions holds, both must hold.
The Invertible Matrix Theorem (IMT)
- The Invertible Matrix Theorem provides a comprehensive list of properties that are logically equivalent for an n×n matrix A. If any one of these statements is true for a particular matrix A, then they are all true. Conversely, if one is false, they are all false.
- The Equivalent Statements:
- (a) The matrix A is an invertible matrix.
- (b) The matrix A is row equivalent to the n×n identity matrix In.
- (c) The matrix A has n pivot positions.
- (d) The equation Ax=0 has only the trivial solution.
- (e) The columns of A form a linearly independent set.
- (f) The linear transformation T(x)=Ax is one-to-one.
- (g) The equation Ax=b has at least one solution for each b in Rn.
- (h) The columns of A span Rn.
- (i) The linear transformation T(x)=Ax maps onto Rn.
- (j) There exists an n×n matrix C such that CA=I.
- (k) There exists an n×n matrix D such that AD=I.
- (l) The transpose matrix AT is an invertible matrix.
Logic and Proof Structure of the IMT
- The proof of the Invertible Matrix Theorem typically follows a "circle of implications" where several statements are linked in a chain (e.g., (a)⟹(b)⟹(c)⋯⟹(a)).
- Specific Logical Links:
- Statement (k) is linked because the inverse matrix itself works as the matrix D.
- Statements (g), (h), and (i) are known to be equivalent for any matrix, connecting them as a block to the theorem.
- Statements (d), (e), and (f) are also equivalent for any matrix A, connecting them as a separate block.
- The transpose (AT) link is established by the property that if A is invertible, then (AT)−1=(A−1)T.
Implications and Disjoint Classes of Matrices
- The Invertible Matrix Theorem divides the set of all possible n×n matrices into two distinct, disjoint classes:
- Invertible (Nonsingular) Matrices: These meet all the criteria listed in the IMT.
- Noninvertible (Singular) Matrices: These fail all the criteria listed in the IMT.
- Properties of Singular Matrices: A singular n×n matrix will:
- Not be row equivalent to the identity matrix In.
- Have fewer than n pivot positions.
- Have columns that are linearly dependent.
- Fail to span Rn.
- If a matrix A is invertible, it is also true that its inverse A−1 is invertible, with (A−1)−1=A.
Practical Application and Constraints of the IMT
- Example Application: To determine if a matrix is invertible, one can perform row reduction. If a 3×3 matrix is reduced and found to have three pivot positions, it is invertible by statement (c) of the IMT.
- Constraint - Square Matrices Only: The Invertible Matrix Theorem applies exclusively to square matrices.
- For example, if a 4×3 matrix (non-square) has linearly independent columns, the IMT cannot be used to make conclusions about the existence of solutions for Ax=b. The theorem does not bridge column independence and the existence of solutions for non-square matrices.
- Matrix multiplication corresponds directly to the composition of linear transformations. When matrix A is invertible, it describes a transformation that can be "undone."
- Definition of an Invertible Transformation: A linear transformation T:Rn→Rn is invertible if there exists a function S:Rn→Rn such that:
- S(T(x))=x for all x in Rn.
- T(S(x))=x for all x in Rn.
- Theorem 9: Let T:Rn→Rn be a linear transformation and let A be its standard matrix. T is invertible if and only if A is an invertible matrix.
- In this case, the inverse transformation S is unique and is represented by the matrix A−1, where S(x)=A−1x.
Proof of Theorem 9
- Part 1: If T is invertible, then A is invertible:
- Assume T is invertible. By the definition of an inverse function, T must map onto Rn.
- Proof: For any b in Rn, let x=S(b). Then T(x)=T(S(b))=b, showing every b is in the range.
- Since T is onto, statement (i) of the Invertible Matrix Theorem implies matrix A is invertible.
- Part 2: If A is invertible, then T is invertible:
- Conversely, if A is invertible, we define a transformation S(x)=A−1x.
- By the properties of matrix inverses: S(T(x))=A−1(Ax)=Ix=x.
- Similarly: T(S(x))=A(A−1x)=Ix=x.
- This satisfies both conditions of an invertible transformation.