An omission (failure to act) or a wrongful act (other than a breach of contract) against a person or his property
Tort
2
New cards
Is Tort Law Civil or Criminal
Civil
3
New cards
What is the purpose of tort law?
To compensate the innocent victim
4
New cards
The person who commits the tort
Tortfeasor
5
New cards
Two or more people going together to commit a tort
Joint Tortfeasors
6
New cards
Can sue both people and hold them both on the line for the damages. Usually, they go after the person with the most resources
Joint and Several Liability Theory
7
New cards
You are responsible for the natural probably causes of what you did, even if you couldn’t expect them
Egg-Shell Theory
8
New cards
The more people you sue, the more likely you are to get your money. So sue people with deep pockets
Deep-pocket theory
9
New cards
A tort done on purpose
Intentional tort
10
New cards
The type of damages for intentional torts
Punitive Damages
11
New cards
No physical contact
Assault
12
New cards
Physical contact
Battery
13
New cards
Physical Ailment
Mental Distress
14
New cards
Detaining someone without a reason
False Imprisonment
15
New cards
Prosecuting without a good reason or justification. Have to prove that they didn’t have information on you
Malicious Prosecution
16
New cards
Must be untrue. A public figure has to prove actual malice. Must be communicated to a third party. The only exception is satire.
Defamation
17
New cards
Written, more damages than defamation because of repetition and permanence
Libel
18
New cards
Verbal Defamation
Slander
19
New cards
Reasonable expectation of privacy, causes damages
Invasion of Privacy
20
New cards
What are the five elements of fraud?
Misstatement, Material Fact, Reasonably relied upon, resulted in damages, scienter (intent)
21
New cards
Enter on to real estate without permission
Trespass onto land
22
New cards
Taking personal property without permission
Trespass onto personal property
23
New cards
Personal property is changed and can’t be returned
Conversion
24
New cards
Someone conducts some act on their real estate that affects other people’s enjoyment of their own property.
Nuisance
25
New cards
Publish an untrue statement about untrue policies that damage the company
Injurious Falsehood or Trade Disparagement
26
New cards
Someone intentionally interferes with a contract
Intentional Interference with Contractual Relations
27
New cards
Any information you receive in the workplace (ex. Coca Cola Recipe)
Trade Secret Violations
28
New cards
Come from written laws
Statutory
29
New cards
Only good for about 20 years, then anyone can use it
Patent Infringement
30
New cards
You own the symbol and you will lose the trademark if it is deemed to be synonymous
Trademark Infringement and False Advertising (Lanham Act of 1946 and Trademark Law Revision Act of 1988)
31
New cards
Can use something if you aren’t making money from it (i.e. education purposes)
Copyright Infringement (Copyright Act of 1976)
32
New cards
Done by accident
Negligence
33
New cards
What are the four elements of negligence?
Duty of Care, Breach of Duty of Care, Causation, Injury/Damages
34
New cards
A relationship between defendant and plaintiff
Duty of Care
35
New cards
Jury is asked : what would a reasonable man have done?
Reasonable Man Doctrine
36
New cards
The thing speaks for itself (essentially, you can use circumstantial evidence)
Res Ipsa Loquitur Doctrine
37
New cards
Direct Result
Causation
38
New cards
What are the actual causes
Actual Causation
39
New cards
Proximate Cause
What are the legal causes
40
New cards
Passenger holding a package containing fireworks exploded and caused a woman to suffer damages from scales above her head. It ended up being the railroad company for putting the scales above her head
Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad
41
New cards
Compare how negligent plaintiff was compared to defendant and allocate loss based on that. Can’t recover the loss caused by the defendant.
Comparative Negligence
42
New cards
Completely eliminates liability if the plaintiff contributed to their own injury
Contributory Negligence
43
New cards
You assume a risk when you do it
Assumption of Risk Doctrine
44
New cards
Barely below reasonable man standard, compensatory damages
Slight Negligence
45
New cards
A bit more below the reasonable man standard than slight negligence
Ordinary Negligence
46
New cards
WAY below the standard, punitive damages
Gross Negligence
47
New cards
The person that caused the damage was inherently dangerous or doing ultra hazardous activity. Easiest to Prove
Strict Liability
48
New cards
What are three examples of Ultra hazardous or Inherently Dangerous Activities ?
Explosives, Product liability, Wild animals
49
New cards
Superior is directly liable for subortinates torts
Doctrine of Respondent Superior
50
New cards
If the employer gives you all the materials, you are an employee. If you are your own employer, then you are an independent contractor. Doctrine of Respondent Superior only applies to employee
Employee v. Independent Contractor Status
51
New cards
During the course of employment AND within the scope of employee’s ability
Two requirements to superior liability
52
New cards
Substance is what ACTUALLY happens, form is what is written. Substance is what is important
Substance-over-Form Test
53
New cards
If you are injured on the job and you didn’t do it to yourself and you are doing what you are authorized to do, the employer is strictly liable for it.