1/146
Looks like no tags are added yet.
how iowa supreme court is elected
appointed by governor, then retention election
list to governor, governor picks, after a year people of Iowa vote yes or no
jb pritzker (D) - IL
tim walz (D) - MN
tony evers (D) - WI
jim pillen (R) - NA
kristi noem (R) - SD
mark parson (R) - MS
neighboring governors of iowa
chet culver
last democratic governor of iowa (2006)
rare example of short tenured governor iowa
rob sand (auditor)
only state elected democratic official in iowa
college towns and cities is where democratic party finds success
nebraska
what state has a unicameral, formally non partisan legislature?
state senates and houses must be equal district based on population
one chamber with 49 legislators
elected by geography rather than party
Maine and Alaska
2 states with ranked choice voting
(candidate A gets 49 votes, candidate B gets 47 votes, candidate C gets 4 votes. look at C’s voters’ other preferences
alaska, louisiana, california, washington
what states have nonpartisan blanket primaries
CA and WA = everyone on primary ballot. one vote. top 2 move onto general election
AK = rank choices. get down 4 to candidates. then general election, then rank again, and get down to 1 candidate
LA = same as other states, but if someone gets majority first, they don’t move onto general election. candidates don’t know if they are going to win right then or have to move onto another election
wisconsin territory
what territory did Iowa belong to before the creation of Iowa territory in 1838?
before this, it was missouri’s territory
sac and fox
with what native american nation (s) was the 1832 treaty of fort armstrong signed, ceding eastern Iowa to non-native settlement?
moralistic, individualistic, traditionalism
elazar’s political cultures
theory: the differences we see across US can be explained by 3 cultures that happened with colonialism, migration, etc.
In New England, moralistic culture because of Puritans
sundays are day off for people
individualistic = middle of country, wasn’t settled for religious reasons. every man for themselves
traditionalism = hierarchy society because of effects of slavery. elite few on top, everyone else is on bottom
hero and tolbert
they find that in general, racial make-up of the state correlates with what Elazar was talking about with the 3 political cultures
bricker and lacombe
people do have clusters of similar “political beliefs”
states around us (WI is alot like IA)
NE has cluster
policies tend to diffuse along the ties and clusters of the states and people
confederalism
relationship between states
interstate compacts
most common interaction between states
each state is in about 25 of these
form of US law that has not been in Washington (reciprocal license: hunter, education license, boating license)
broad spectrum: sometimes they are meant to change law without congress
ex.: quad cities metropolitan authority compact: IA and IL. public transit, new roads, landfills
9th amendment: states have right to make laws about certain things that are not expressed in Constitution
commerce
federalism
relationship between federal government and a state
formerly layer cake, now marble cake
based on pragmatic mixing of authority and programs among the national, state, and local governments
most changes have been federal authorities down. can be federal government taking over by state. federal government can own state land
federal land
land that belongs to the federal government, but is within a state but the state doesn’t have authority over it
just under 1/3 of land in US is federal
a lot of western states’ lands are owned by federal government
most federal land is run by president and his people (department of defense, national park service, forest services)
us postal services = federal land
state constitutions
generally restricting, rather than allowing
9th amendment. anything not restricted by federal government can be legislated on by the state
can codify policy
ex. state constitutional restrictions for same-sex marriage
up until 2015: states had right to make any policy about marriage they wanted
constitutions have provisions that marriage should be between men and women
things are written in constitutions that cannot be legally enforced
local government
always subservient to state governments. but two broad types
1. home rule: charters grant municipal governments rights, often specific in state constitution
2. dillon’s rule: states have total control over local governments (townships)
named after iowa SC justice that ruled in a case against a county that brought to the state about whether or not county could make regulation different from the states
usually, township governments are separate from city governments
state party policy
majority and minority party, usually restricting majority party recognition to D and R parties
usually, ballot access is guaranteed for major parties and more difficult for minor parties
iowa legally has 3 parties: R, D, Libertarian
can have NPPOs = any group can be this with ballot description
state party organizations
in general: county committees elect state committees; state committees elect national committees
parties may also have precinct, municipal, legislative district, or congressional district committees
parties may also have conventions at these levels: conventions are temporary, committees are permanent
iowa has county, congressional district, and state committees
caucuses are precinct conventions
legislative district conventions can also be called to fill vacancies
each committee is led by a chair
closed primaries
voters must be registered with party to vote
sometimes voters aren’t allowed to change their party within 2 months of election date
states where the 2 parties are quite competitive (FL)
partially closed primaries
parties choose whether to allow unaffiliated voters to vote
partially open primaries
legally closed, but voters can change registration on election day
a lot like a closed primary BUT you can change political affiliation on the day of election
iowa is partially open
open primaries
any voter can participate in any primary
blanket primaries
no party primary; all candidates on ballot together
CA: for presidential primaries = closed
primary run-offs
you can change your vote/party affiliation in the run-off election than what you voted in the primary election
political competition
one-party dominance is usual in most states
one-party dominance typically correlated with lower turnout (does dominance cause low turnout, or does low turnout cause dominance?)
iowa predominated by R since 2021 but switches back and forth between party dominance
but there is not any true dominance in the state since great depression (R)
Political participation
turnout correlated with wealth and education
protestants turn out more than catholics, nonreligious people
black and hispanic turnout increase with black and hispanic population and representation in legislature
felons barred from voting while in prisons in 48 states
ME and VT are exceptions
All but 11 states automatically reinstated at some point
Reynolds issued blanket restoration of voting rights to all non-homicidal felons in Iowa in 2020
voter ID laws
little evidence that voter ID laws affect turnout
some R have supported voter ID laws believing they reduce D votes
voter ID laws probably have no effect on partisan turnout and have bipartisan support in the electorate
why iowa reading
1972: McGovern-Fraser Commission requires Dem primaries and caucuses to all registered Ds
Iowa’s 4 tiered convention system (precinct, count, congressional district, state) required early start
iowa caucuses came before NH primaries
1976: under liberal R gov. Robert Ray, state Rs open their caucuses to all registrants
1976: Jimmy Carter, then longshot, realized how IA win would get him attention
NH primary was considered “1st in nation”
carter wins: Iowa now considered “1st in nation”
Also won nomination of D party and then general election
not many people that have won IA caucuses have gone on to win the general election (only Jimmy Carter, George W. Bush and Barack Obama)
caucus night in iowa for democrats
sounded a horn for redistribution
group up and then count themselves
heckling
caucus night in iowa for republicans
prayed before
in-person vote by secret ballot
no redistribution: ballot counts are sent directly to state party for delegate allocation
traditional membership groups
type of interest groups
generally, dues-paying groups with set memberships
some have party affiliations, some do not
national organizations lobby a lot on state levels (state chapters, ABA is national, but lobbying is done by state bar associations)
Ex labor unions, AARP, NRA, Sierra Club, homeowner's’ associations
institutional interests
type of interest groups
organizations with interest in lobbying, but do not exist for the sake of lobbying
Ex. local governments, universities, businesses
almost every county and municipality (city of Ames)
local governments are involuntary membership group in a way. you don’t move somewhere to be a part of lobbying group
universities have big institutional interest (board of regents, state legislature, governor, etc. undergraduate student government)
businesses are typically large (someone has a job to lobby state: Liaison)
associations
type of interest groups
groups of groups
Ex. chambers of commerce (local and state), AFL-CIO, national federation of independent businesses (interest groups for small businesses)
competing interests
lobbying
attempting to influence government decisions
typically looks like: talking to legislators, writing, emailing, outreach to executive officials, influence judges
common forms of lobbying
taking legislators to lunch (this is sometimes illegal)
crafting model legislation
american legislative exchange council has crafted a lot of model legislation
model legislation: a bill with text that has been proposed. these are the things we want to put in the code of your state. legislators will oftentimes change the language of the bill
uniform law commission
make sure control law are similar across the states
make sure you don’t break laws across states because some states have slightly different business law
election spending (for initiatives and candidates)
form of advertisement
direct ad!
cy-hawk game (pro-nikki haley ads are a lot from different groups that back conservative candidates and businesspeople. they are from interest group that support her)
call your legislator ads
form of advertisement
popup when controversial legislation comes up
really big when affordable legislation comes up
“reject obama care. tell your legislator”
interest groups trying to influence you
energy stability area model
energy: policy issue and change
active governments have more interest groups than less active governments
states with more electoral competition have more interest groups than other states
stability
international analysis of interest groups
mainly invented to explain interest groups across the world
in US - stability doesn’t really matter (states don’t change that much)
area
states with more population and bigger economies have more interest groups
contract lobbyists
type of lobbyist
lobby for no one in particular, just “on contract”
inhouse lobbyists
type of lobbyist
lobby for single interest group
big interest groups (NRA, ACLU)
most lobbyists are not inhouse
government lobbyists
type of lobbyist
like inhouse lobbyists but for governments
usually also have some sort of accountability role (must testify before legislative committees)
private-individual lobbyists
type of lobbyist
you, if you contacted an elected official
but generally, people with substantial time and resources and a strong personal interest
historically a large group, now less than 5% of lobbying activity
mass partisanship
form of public opinion
proportion of people in a state who identify with a political party
for most of 20th century, most states had D majorities
mass ideology
form of public opinion
proportion of people in a state who identify as a liberal, moderate, or conservative
for most of 20th century, most states had conservative majorities
the word liberal has different meanings to different people
policy mood
form of public opinion
disposition towards government (usually government spending)
how much should the government be involved in our lives?
feelings about what the government should be doing
varies over time, across states, across individuals
specific opinion
opinion about a single issue or set of issues
social issues tend to move around - support tends to increase over time (legalization of gay marriage)
defense spending goes up with D presidency and down with R presidency
salience
newspaper attention
important well-known issues
more coherent opinions about these issues
education is more ___ in IA than in other places because of recent policies
morality policy
debates over basic values in which at least one side portrays the issues as involving morality or sin
sometimes called “social issues”
ex. abortion, capital punishment, LGBTQ+ rights
do policies reflect citizens’ preferences?
yes, but sometimes no
social/morality policy generally reflect citizens’ better than economic policy (possibly because it isn’t salient)
submerged state
the set of difficult to observe and complex policies that citizens lack consistent opinions on
ex. earned income tax credit. not something that someone has consistent opinions on
congruence
extent to which policy outcomes match policy opinions
about half the time policies reflect the will of the people (they are typically social issues)
morality policy
more of a correlation
what impacts this?
gerrymandering reduces this
elected judges increases this
“checks and balances” reduces this (less centralized power. less likely power is going to respond to public opinion)
legislative professionalism increases this (legislators want to be responsive to opinion
direct initiative
voters circulate a petition to put an issue on ballot
indirect initiative
voters circulate a petition to put an issue on ballot, except legislature has chance to create alternative measure to be voted on alongside voters’ proposal
popular referendum
voters circulative a petition to repeal a law
MD and NM have this without initiatives
used once in Arkansas to repeal soda tax
mostly used for tax measures
ends up on ballot
acts similar to direct initiative. limited things legislature has passed
constitutional amendment = supermajority of petition (FL)
legislative referendum
legislature refers issue to voters (every state has this. not direct democracy)
ever votes on issue in IA or IL = we are voting on legislative referendum
means for the legislature to give to voters the right to vote yes or no on an issue
populist era
origin of initiative
first state to adopt initiative = SD
belief that common people have more wisdom than legislature (elites are inherently corrupt)
last decade of 19th century
progressive era
origin of initiative
first time initiative was used = OR
huge user of the initiative for policy making compared to the rest of the states
belief that giving citizens lawmaking power would increase citizens’ political participation
usually believe lawmakers and governments are good
the initiative process
proposal drafted by proponents, proposal submitted to state office (title assigned), proponents circulate petitions, state office verifies petitioners have signatures to qualify, voters vote
proposal drafted by proponents
consulting with lawyers period
any citizen can write up a proposal, but in general, most initiative campaigns don’t work this way
groups start meeting with lawyers and craft a piece of legislation to get what they want
proposal submitted to state office; title assigned
almost always the secretary of state
office can start messing with things
proponents circulate petitions
longest and most important step
usually takes months
canvassers approach citizens to sign petitions
trying to get registered voters to sign petitions
states have different rules and laws regarding canvassers (sometimes they have to be registers, or can’t be felons, or a notary has to be present)
state office verifies petitioners have signatures to qualify
most campaigns make sure they have more than enough signatures
people might accidentally sign twice, or might be out of state and accidentally signed it)
state office will verify they are registered voters, and they meet the other requirements
voters vote
in most states, the petition is then put on ballot for election day
officeholders have discretion
sometimes they put initiatives they don’t want on the ballot on weird days/times
initiatives and interest groups
interest groups have major incentive to be involved in initiative process
initiatives allow interest group competition
medical association wants cap on amount of $ that can be given in lawsuits. ABA did not like this. pit against each other
interest groups bankroll many initiatives campaigns
advertising increases voter knowledge about initiatives, as do interest group affiliations
initiatives and civil rights
initiatives have been used by the majority to target stigmatized minority groups
ex. same-sex marriage bans in the 2000s
often (but not always) overturned or limited by courts
reynolds v sims
requires equal representation in state legislatures (“one man, one vote”)
usually
senate = bigger districts
house = county/smaller districts
senators serve longer terms than reps
usually
senators = 4 years
reps = 2 years
lower
most (but not all) states require the budget to originate in ____ chamber
in practice, this doesn’t matter. budget negotiated beforehand. state senate still has to approve, state senate can still amend the budget
40 Alaska, 400 New Hampshire, 20 Alaska, 67 Minnesota
lower chambers are always bigger than upper chambers
lower chambers range from ___ (__) to __ (__)
upper chambers range from ___ (__) to __ (__)
as you move west = state legislature size gets smaller (most states haven’t changed their state legislature sizes since when the state was founded. populations used to be very small and just hasn’t changed)
population per state senator
states with large populations = even if state senates are large, they are still going to represent a lot of people (CA)
population per state senator
in general, the big states have more disparity but not always
PA has so many reps and high population that it looks as KY which has small population
district magnitude
in 41 states, all members are elected in single-member districts
in 7 states, same legislative districts for both chambers
each district elects 1 senator and 2 reps (3 “representatives”)
ID and WA elect members by “post,” all other by “bloc”
bloc vote
iowa does most local elections like this
list of candidates: you have this many seats open, you can vote for up to this number of people
issue
if everyone can vote for their bloc of candidates, in practice, every single person only represents the majority of people. no representation for the minority
legislative professionalism
“the capacity of the legislature to act as an effective and independent institution”
professional legislatures have: higher legislator salary, longer session, larger staff, your JOB is to be a legislator
in general, larger states have more professional legislatures
“traditionalistic” states often have less professional legislatures
fulltime, well paid, large staff
type of legislature
most professional
4 states = CA, MI, PA, NY
you shouldn’t have outside work
full time lite
type of legislature
lacking in some sort of capacity
6 states: IL, WI, OH, MA, HI, AK
hybrid
type of legislature
some things they are good at. other things they are really bad at
MOST STATES
some sort of outside job
IA = enough to get by, but not live comfortably. most legislators have outside jobs. one of biggest legislative staffs in the country (good)
part time lite
type of legislature
10 states
part time, low pay, small staff
type of legislature
4 states
redistricting
originally, most legislatures redistricted themselves, with guidelines in state constitutions
some states adopted redistricting “politician commissions” (commissions composed on non-legislator politicians) in the progressive era
reynolds v sims overturned constitutional guidelines for redistricting
made district sizes equal. courts began to take active roles in redistricting. but, made gerrymandering easier
some states have recently adopted independent redistricting commissions and constitutional redistricting guidelines
polarization
historically, parties were less ideologically polarized in the states than in Congress
in some states (especially south), intraparty factions were more polarized than state parties were
In CA: parties have long been polarized (less likely to see R cosponsor D bill)
IL: anti-establishment in factions. historically been very odd state in this way
1990s
polarization has increased since ___
decline in conservative southern D partially to blame
aren’t many conservatives in D party
moving away from center on both parties
corresponds with general party polarization trend at all levels of government
iowa general assembly
composed of two houses (senate and house of reps)
50 senators elected to 4 year terms. roughly half senate is elected every 2 years
100 representatives elected to 2 year terms (whole house all at once)
every senate district is divided into 2 house districts
every IA congressional district has 25 state house district
sessions: 110 days in odd numbered years. 100 days in even numbered years
legislative process in IA
legislator files bill
bill referred to committee
committee pick subcommittee to vote on bill
committee then votes on bill. can recommend whole house vote or can transfer to another committee
funnel week (all bills not out of committee are dead)
scheduling: speaker/president decides when (if at all) to put bill to vote
debate
vote
if vote passes, round of debate and vote in other chamber (if leadership allows)
if passes, other chamber, signed into law. if amended, chambers have reconciliation committee draft identical versions to pass
leadership in the iowa general assembly
house of reps
majority party = speaker, speaker pro temp, majority leader, and majority whip
minority party = minority leader and minority whip
speaker is actual majority leader and controls what bills are voted on
whip = whip legislators into shape
senate
majority party = president, president pro temp, majority leader, and majority whip
minority party = minority leader and minority whip
president = actual majority leader
lieutenant governor was president of senate until 1991 (in most states this is still true, NOT in Iowa)
current leadership of iowa legislature
speaker of iowa house of reps: pat grassley (R)
minority leader in house: jennifer konfrst (D)
president of senate: amy sinclar (R)
minority leader: pam jochum (D)
third parties in iowa legislature
2016-2019: david johnson elected as R but left party. Independent
1922: last time a legislator was elected as independent
1891: last time a legislator was elected as a member of a 3rd party
governors
elected to 4 year terms (except in NH and VT = elected 2 years)
36 states (including IA) elect governors at presidential midterms
11 states (including MO) elect governors same time as president
3 states elect governors the year before presidential election
2 states elect governors the year after presidential election (maintain older systems)
gubernatorial
In KY, LA, MS
seems to be that whatever party wins ____ election, the other party is favored in presidential election
citizen and gubernatorial ideology
strong correlation between citizen identification and gubernatorial position taking EXCEPT when looking at parties separately
Ex. RI governor is D but is also pretty conservative and represents one of the most liberal states in US
doesn’t seem like people get what they want once they select one party
pre-gubernatorial experience
“penultimate office” before governorship for current governors
not everything they have done, but what is the thing they did and were known for when elected to government
13 were lieutenant governors ***
8 US reps
7 state attorney general
a lot of silly ones too
institutional power
gubernatorial power
veto power, term limits, executive type, legislative session length, control over appointments
shorter legislature session = more executive power for governor
executie orders (ICOE) = COVID
in other states: responsible for all appointments
personal power
gubernatorial power
extent to which an individual governor can control state government, regardless of institutional power
varies with election results, approval rating, personality, and state expectation of governor
election results
gubernatorial personal power
governor who wins election/reelection by ALOT has more power than someone who barely got elected. “these people trust me to do what is needed”
approval rating
gubernatorial personal power
higher rating = the people support me!
doesn’t matter rating when elected, it is the current approval rating
can grow this which grows personal power
personality
gubernatorial personal power
governors are people who are very charismatic
can get their way because their personality tends to be more buzzy
state expectation of governorship
gubernatorial personal power
different expectation of what a governor should do and what role they can play in a state
varies from state to state
NE: Governor doesn’t do much and is not public figure
South: Governors are institutionally weak, but in practice, there is expectation for the governors to be grandfatherly figure
veto power
most governors have stronger ___ than presidents
but they have “line-item veto”
allows governors to veto parts of legislation, allowing rest to be signed into law
some states have “vanna white veto:” governor can block out letters within a word to change meaning of bill (common in WI)
will veto letters within words so it becomes something completely different
Ex. governor of WI (Thompson R)
appropriations to PBS: $50,000. he vetoed zeros
gives governors HUGE influence in lawmakingt