CJ 202 Midterm Review

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/111

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

112 Terms

1
New cards
Federalism
A system of political organization with 2 or more levels of government, coexisting in the same area, with the lower levels having some independent powers
2
New cards
Dual Soverignty
When multiple governments have concurrent authority over people or policy
3
New cards
Commerce Clause
Empowers the federal government to regulate commerce between the states, with foreign governments, & Indian tribes
4
New cards
Necessary & Proper Clause
Enables the federal government to create criminal laws to support its other specifically listed powers
5
New cards
Supremacy Clause
6
New cards
Appellate Court
A higher court that can hear appeals from a lower court
7
New cards
Briefs
A written document filed with a court through which a party presents a legal claim, legal theory, supporting authorities, & requests some form of relief
8
New cards
Record on Appeal
A formal, written account of a case, containing the complete formal history of all actions taken, papers filed, rulings made, opinions written, & so forth
9
New cards
Remand
The return of a case from a higher court to a lower court with instructions for the lower court to act in some manner
10
New cards
Reverse
To determine that the lower court has rendered a wrong decision & to change that decision
11
New cards
Intermediate
The level courts in the federal system are the U.S. Courts of Appeal
12
New cards
11;1
There are judicial circuits in the United States, with court(s) of appeals in each circuit
13
New cards
13
How many U.S. courts of appeals are there?
14
New cards
Circuit courts; Supreme Court
Appeals from the are taken to the
15
New cards
Court of Record
Generally, another term for trial court
16
New cards
De Novo
For a case to be tried again as if there had not been a prior trial
17
New cards
Courts of General Jurisdiction
Have jurisdiction over felony offenses
18
New cards
Courts of General Jurisdiction
\-Different names depending on location: felony, superior, supreme, county, & circuit

\-Handle the more serious felony cases & civil cases, in which damages are over a specified amount

\-Typically organized in judicial districts or circuits, based on a political division such as a county or a group of counties
19
New cards
Criminal Law
\-Intended to deter undesirable behavior

\-Offer victims and the community at large a sense of retribution

\-Incapacitate offenders; to reduce their opportunity to reoffend. This is done through imprisonment, electronic monitoring, death, and other methods

\-Rehabilitation

\-Restoration

\-Imposes fines, restitution, imprisonment, counseling, rehabilitation, injunctions, capital punishment

\-The *standard of proof* must be beyond a reasonable doubt

\-The government bears burden of proof & process designed to protect rights of defendant (due process)

\-Involves the government & the individual defendant
20
New cards
Objectives
The biggest difference between crinimal & civil law is their ?
21
New cards
Civil Law
\-The primary purpose is the compensation of people who are injured by someone else’s conduct

\-Involves the individual plaintiff & defendant

\-Plaintiff bears burden of proof and parties treated equally in process
22
New cards
Tort
A civil (as opposed to a criminal) wrong, other than a breach of contract
23
New cards
Strict Liability
The legal responsibility for damage or injury, even if you are not at fault or negligent
24
New cards
Punitive Damages
Damages that are awarded over & above compensatory damages or actual damages because of the wanton, reckless, or malicious nature of the wrong done by the plaintiff
25
New cards
The government—whether national, state, or local
In criminal law, who always files criminal charges?
26
New cards
Social Contract
An implied agreement between all people that they will obey the laws and relinquish a measured amount of liberty in exchange for security
27
New cards
Substantive Law
28
New cards
Procedural Law
Establishes the methods used to enforce legal rights and obligations
29
New cards
Substance of Tort Law
Defines what a tort is & what damages an injured party is entitled to recover from a lawsuit
30
New cards
Substantive Contract Law
Defines what a contract is, tells whether it must be in writing to be enforceable, who must sign it, what the penalty for breach is, and other such information
31
New cards
Criminal Law
Defines what constitutes a crime &what punishment can be imposed for committing crimes
32
New cards
Criminal Procedure
The rules of procedure by which criminal prosecutions are governed
33
New cards
Retributivism & Utilitarianism
What are the 2 overarching philosophies to explain why conduct is criminalized & punished
34
New cards
Common Law
The legal system that originated in England and is composed of case law and statutes that grow and change, influenced by ever-changing custom and tradition
35
New cards
Stare Decisis
The doctrine that judicial decisions stand as precedents for cases arising in the future
36
New cards
Due Process (5th & 14th Amendments)
Require that no persons be deprived of life, liberty, or property without having notice and a real chance to present their side in a legal dispute
37
New cards
Procedural Due Process
Requires that individuals be put on notice of impending government action, be given an opportunity to be heard & to present evidence, & in some cases, benefit from other rights
38
New cards
Substantive Due Process
Recognizes individual rights to act or not to act
39
New cards
Ordinances
Laws enacted by city, county, & other local governments
40
New cards
Regulatory Agencies
Oversee & regulate the practice of medicine in the various states
41
New cards
Judicial Conference
In the federal system, the rules are drafted by the under the direction of the Supreme Court and then presented to Congress
42
New cards
Model Penal Code
A proposed criminal code prepared jointly by the Commission on Uniform State Laws and the American Law Institute
43
New cards
By inferences & presumptions
How is the mens rea proven?
44
New cards
Inference
A fact (or proposition) that is probably true because a true fact (or proposition) leads you to believe that the inferred fact (or proposition) is also true
45
New cards
Presumption
An automatic assumption required by law that whenever a certain set of facts shows up, a court must automatically draw certain legal conclusions
46
New cards
Irrebuttable Presumptions
Conclusions that must be made by the judge or jury & can’t be disproved
47
New cards
All the elements of the crime were committed
The prosecution must prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, that?
48
New cards
Malum in Se
Acts that are inherently evil
49
New cards
Constructive Intent
\-Inferred, implied, or presumed from the circumstances

\-Applies when a defendant does not intend to cause the result, but it is likely to occur
50
New cards
Legal Cause
The proximate cause of an injury; probable cause; cause that the law deems sufficient
51
New cards
Proximate Cause
The “legal cause” of an accident or other injury (which may have several actual causes)
52
New cards
Forseeable
The degree to which the consequences of an action should have been anticipated, recognized, & considered beforehand
53
New cards
The “Year-and-a-Day-Rule”
At common law, a person couldn’t be charged with murder if the victim didn’t die within 1 year & one day after the act
54
New cards
Concurrance
The joining of mens rea & the act
55
New cards
Offense Analysis
The assignment of a single mens rea to an offense
56
New cards
Element Analysis
The assignment of separate mens rea to each element of an offense
57
New cards
Predicate Offense
An act or offense that is an element of another crime
58
New cards
Malice
A form of specific intent; the defendant’s purpose had to be cause of the victim’s death
59
New cards
2nd Degree Murder
Murder without premeditation
60
New cards
Corpus Delicti
The material substance upon which a crime has been committed
61
New cards
Assault
An intentional threat, show of force, or movement that could reasonably make a person feel in danger of physical attack or harmful physical contact
62
New cards
Battery
An intentional, unconsented to, physical contact by one person (or an object controlled by that person) with another person
63
New cards
Burglary
Unlawfully entering the house of another person with the intention of committing a felony (usually theft)
64
New cards
Malicious Mischief
The criminal offense of intentionally destroying another person’s property
65
New cards
Larceny
Stealing of any kind
66
New cards
Asportation
The act of moving the property
67
New cards
Conversion
Any act that deprives an owner of property without that owner’s permission and without just cause
68
New cards
Robbery
The illegal taking of property from the person of another by using force or threat of force
69
New cards
Extortion
To acquire property or money using threats of harm to person, property, or reputation
70
New cards
Brandenburg Test
An exception to free speech. Speech that is directed at causing imminent lawless action and is likely to cause such action may be regulated
71
New cards
Contempt
A willful disobeying of a judge’s command or official court order
72
New cards
Espionage
The practice of spying or of using spies, typically by governments to obtain political & military information
73
New cards
Principal in the 2nd Degree
A person who is physically present and assists a principal in the first degree but does not commit the actus reus of the crime
74
New cards
Natural & Probable Consequences Doctrine
A rule that holds that accomplices are criminally liable for the unplanned but foreseeable crimes of the principal in the first degree that are committed during the planned crime
75
New cards
Res Ipsa Loquitur
Looks at crimes individually & finds an act, a certain point in time, which indicates that the defendant has “no other purpose than the commission of that specific crime
76
New cards
Probable Desistance
Focuses on the likelihood that the defendant would have followed through with the crime had the opportunity existed
77
New cards
Legal Impossibility
A person who is unable to commit a crime because of legal impossibility cannot be convicted of a crime he or she intends or attempts
78
New cards
Wharton Rule
Two people cannot be charged with conspiracy when the underlying offense itself requires two people
79
New cards
Hearsay
A statement about what someone else said (or wrote or otherwise communicated)
80
New cards
Affirmative Defense
A defense that is more than a simple denial of the charges. It raises a new matter that may result in an acquittal or a reduction of liability
81
New cards
Burden of Proof
The requirement that to win a point or have an issue decided in your favor in a lawsuit, you must show that the weight of evidence is on your side rather than “in the balance” on that question
82
New cards
Burden of Production
The requirement that one side in a lawsuit produce evidence on a particular issue or risk losing on that issue
83
New cards
Burden of Persuasion
Refers to convincing the court that the issue raised is true
84
New cards
Prima Facie
On first impression; sufficient evidence introduced early in a case to continue with a claim
85
New cards
Diminished Capacity
Having a certain recognized form of diminished mental capacity while committing a crime should lead to the imposition of a lesser punishment or to lowering the degree of the crime
86
New cards
M’Naghten Test
Employed in some jurisdictions for determining whether criminal defendants had the capacity to form criminal intent at the time they committed the crime of which they are accused
87
New cards
Irresistable Impulse
The loss of control due to insanity that is so great that a person cannot stop from committing a crime
88
New cards
Durham Rule
Defendants are not guilty of a crime because of insanity if they were “suffering from a disease or defective mental condition at the time of the act and there was a causal connection between the condition and the act."
89
New cards
insane at the time of trial
The Supreme Court has held that a defendant who is may not be tried
90
New cards
Cooper v. Oklahoma (1996)
The Supreme Court held that the burden of proof can be placed on the defendant but that the standard of proof cannot exceed preponderance of evidence
91
New cards
Duress
Unlawful pressure on what a person would not otherwise have done. It includes force, threats of violence, physical restraint, etc.
92
New cards
Retreat to the Wall Doctrine
The doctrine that before a person is entitled to use deadly force in self-defense, he or she must attempt to withdraw from the encounter by giving as much ground as possible
93
New cards
Castle Doctrine
An exception to the retreat doctrine, one has no obligation to retreat from his or her home before using deadly force to repel an intruder
94
New cards
Graham v. Connor (1989)
·       In 1989, the Court handed down , in which the standard was set for all pre-conviction seizures, deadly & nondeadly
95
New cards
Mistake of Fact
A defense whenever it negates the mens rea aspect of a crime
96
New cards
Statutes of Limitation
A period of time during which various types of civil actions and criminal prosecutions can be brought after the occurrence of the injury or the offense
97
New cards
State Action Doctrine
The rule that constitutional rights only limit governments, not private parties
98
New cards
Double Jeopardy Clause
A second prosecution by the same government against the same person for the same crime (or for a lesser included offense) once the first prosecution is totally finished and decided
99
New cards
Dual-Soveriegnty Clause
A second prosecution by a different government against the same person for the same crime (or for a lesser included offense)
100
New cards
Dual-Soveriegnty Clause
What clause was affirmed in Gamble v. U.S (2019)