Briathwaite - Distinction between Disintegrative and Reintegrative Shaming

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
0.0(0)
full-widthCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/4

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

5 Terms

1
New cards

What does Braithwaite argue in his theory about the distinction about Disintegrative and Reintegrative Shaming?

How society shames offenders can affect whether they can continue to commit deviant acts

  • not all labelling has negative effects

2
New cards

How does Briathwaite define Disintegrative Shaming?

When the offender is publicly labelled and rejected by society

  • shaming stigmatises the person

  • doesn’t separate the deed from the doer - whole person is condemned - outsider

3
New cards

What does Briathwaite suggest that Disintegrative Shaming lead to?

Offender becomes furtherly alienated

  • increases the chance of continued deviance or criminal behaviour

4
New cards

How does Briathwaite define Reintegrative Shaming?

Shaming that condemns the offence, but then accepts the offender back into society

  • forgiveness and reintegration

5
New cards

What does Briathwaite suggest that Reintegrative Shaming lead to?

Labels the act as wrong but shows respect for the individual - allows the to repair their social bonds