forgetting interference

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
0.0(0)
full-widthCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/15

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

16 Terms

1
New cards

Interference

Interference is when old and new memories compete and make it harder to remember information.

2
New cards

Proactive interference

old info interferes with new info.

3
New cards

Retroactive interference

new info interferes with old info.

4
New cards

Effects of similarity

Interference is stronger when the information is similar.

  • You are more likely to get confused if two memories look alike.

5
New cards

P

Strength: evidence for effects of similarity

6
New cards

E

McGeoch and McDonald: pps given a list of ten words to remember, then a secondary list of different words, either synonyms, antonyms, completely unrelated words, etc.

7
New cards

E

Recall was the worst in the group that had learnt synonyms in their second list

8
New cards

L

Demonstrates effects of similarity on recall

9
New cards

P

Limitation: research support lacks validity

10
New cards

E

Studies conducted in lab, findings lack ecological validity, stimulus lacks mundane realism

11
New cards

E

Real life = motivation, e.g. learning and recalling birthdays or material for exams

12
New cards

L

Interference may be more likely to happen in a lab, so research may tell us little about interference in real life

13
New cards

P

Limitation: interference overcome with cues

14
New cards

E

Tulving and Psotka (1971): pps given word list organised into categories, adding new lists each time, recall of original list was initially 70%, progressively worse as pps learnt new lists

15
New cards

E

Participants were then told the previously unknown names of the categories and recall of the original list again rose to around 70%

16
New cards

L

Shows that cues causing retrieval failure more accurate explanation than interference