MKTG 322 Exam 2

studied byStudied by 28 People
0.0(0)
Get a hint
hint

Over how many consumers predict spending?

1/102

Tags & Description

Studying Progress

New cards
102
Still learning
0
Almost done
0
Mastered
0
102 Terms
New cards

Over how many consumers predict spending?

70%

New cards
New cards

What percentage of Americans who own a smartphone use at least one personal finance app?

63%

New cards
New cards

Asking yourself, "How much money will I spend next week?" is equivalent to saying what?

How much will I spend on average

New cards
New cards

accessibility

the ease with which information comes to mind

New cards
New cards

heuristic

cognitive shortcut or rule of thumb; an easily accessible piece of information that aids in decision making.

New cards
New cards

when faced with a difficult decision, we often answer an easier one instead consciously or unconsciously?

unconsciously

New cards
New cards

why do heuristics matter?

to aid in decision making

New cards
New cards

judgement

evaluations or estimates regarding the likelihood of events

New cards
New cards

bias

predictable, systematic deviation from objective standard

New cards
New cards

expense prediction bias

the under prediction of future expenses

New cards
New cards

why are the "average" predictions problematic?

Mode

New cards
New cards

mode

most often

New cards
New cards

mean

ave

New cards
New cards

median

the middle number when lined up greatest to least

New cards
New cards

prediction is the: mean, mode, or median?

mode

New cards
New cards

reality is the: mean, mode, or median?

mean

New cards
New cards

income prediction bias

the over production of future income

New cards
New cards

in the income prediction bias, the mean is _____ the mode

less than

New cards
New cards

in the expense prediction bias, the mean is _____ the mode

greater than

New cards
New cards

affective forecasting

consumers predictions of how they will feel in the future

New cards
New cards

WHAT will I feel

valence (good or bad) nature of feeling (specific emotion)

New cards
New cards

HOW much will I feel it

intensity

New cards
New cards

HOW LONG will I feel this way

duration

New cards
New cards

durability bias

over predicting the emotional impact of future events

New cards
New cards

focalism

overweighting one slice of information

New cards
New cards

problem recognition

the PERCEIVED difference between an ideal and an actual state.

New cards
New cards

problem recognition is the ____ step of the decision-making process

first

New cards
New cards

ideal state

the way consumers would like a situation to be

New cards
New cards

actual state

the real situation as consumers perceives it now

New cards
New cards

T/F: problem recognition occurs if consumers become aware of a discrepancy of an ideal state and an actual state

True

New cards
New cards

internal search

process of recalling stored information from memory. naturally limited by consumer's ability to store and process

New cards
New cards

T/F: recognition is far easier than recall

True

New cards
New cards

consumers recall

brands attributes e

New cards
New cards

consumer decision making is influenced by ______

accessibility

New cards
New cards

base rate information

objective truth about how often an event really occurs on average. often ignored due to biases

New cards
New cards

the "law" of small numbers

intuitive belief that small samples are accurate (ex: getting bit by a shark)

New cards
New cards

are decisions based off heuristics dumb?

no because it simplifies our decision making

New cards
New cards

survival bias

focusing on causes of success rather than causes of failure. another examples of focalism

New cards
New cards

the planning fallacy

understanding project completion times (your plan vs. reality)

New cards
New cards

why do we underestimate

we focus on the future and ignore relevant experiences in the past

New cards
New cards

system 1

fast, automatic, effortless, intuitive. this is where heuristics live

New cards
New cards

system 2

slow, deliberate, effortful, rational. this is where logical reasoning lives.

New cards
New cards

when does system 2 kick in?

when we say so...except sometimes; when the task seems difficult

New cards
New cards

T/F: we have a tendency towards focalism

true

New cards
New cards

T/F: accessibility determines our focus

true

New cards
New cards

reference point

basis or standard for evaluation

New cards
New cards

anchoring and adjustment

decisions are often anchored on a reference point, then adjusted up or down

New cards
New cards

choice overload

large selection can grab consumers' attention, but it can also result in fewer purchases when too much choice is paralyzing

New cards
New cards

solution for choice overload

categorization

New cards
New cards

maximizers

look for the best option and tend to make more money

New cards
New cards

satisficer

look for the good enough option and are happier

New cards
New cards

classical economic perspective

consumers are rational; they integrate as much information as possible and make fully informed decisions and manage to maximize their utility (ex: satisfaction). this perspective is normative and is how we should act

New cards
New cards

behavioral economic perspective

factors like heuristics, bias, framing effects, and emotions prevent us from acting like rational agents. this perspective is descriptive and captures how we actually believe

New cards
New cards

internal decisions influenced by:

accessibility heuristics biases

New cards
New cards

external decisions influenced by:

defaults compromise/ decoy effects framing effects

New cards
New cards

T/F: reference group (or individual group member) of relevance to a consumer's choices and behavior

true

New cards
New cards

factors that make up a group or reference group

propinquity group cohesiveness mere exposure

New cards
New cards

propinquity

physical and psychological proximity

New cards
New cards

group cohesiveness

degree to which members of a group are attracted to each other and value their group membership

New cards
New cards

reference group #1: the "in-group"

social group in which we belong to

New cards
New cards

reference group #2: the aspirational "out-group"

groups to which we aspire to belong, or group members who we aspire to be like

New cards
New cards

reference groups #1 and #2 are influence by ______

conformity

New cards
New cards

reference group #3: the dissociative "out-group"

groups (or individuals) that stand in contrast to self-identity

New cards
New cards

what influences reference group #3?

dissociation

New cards
New cards

social norms

a group's customs, traditions, standards, rules, values, etc.

New cards
New cards

why are social norms so powerful?

need for affiliation

New cards
New cards

need for affiliation

fundamental human desire to feel a sense of connection, association, and similarity with other people

New cards
New cards

descriptive norms

convey information about what other people commonly do

New cards
New cards

when can descriptive norms backfire?

suicide prevention programs, eating disorder awareness, parties with people who have covid-19

New cards
New cards

how do we solve descriptive norms?

injunctive norms

New cards
New cards

injunctive norm

convey information about what we should or should not do

New cards
New cards

when does social rejection increase liking?

rejection comes from an aspirational brand brand must represent the consumer's ideal self salesperson must reflect the brand image

New cards
New cards

why does social rejection increase liking?

need for affiliation

New cards
New cards

need for uniqueness

desire to differentiate oneself from others

New cards
New cards

T/F: need for uniqueness modifies need for affiliation but does not replace it

true

New cards
New cards

choice architecture

structure of a decision environment

New cards
New cards

the default effect

consumers tend to stick with pre-selected options

New cards
New cards

why are defaults so powerful?

social proof decision ease focalism

New cards
New cards

why are defaults ineffective?

when consumers have strong beliefs

New cards
New cards

the compromise effect

consumers tend to choose in the middle because most people are hardwired to avoid extremes

New cards
New cards

the decoy effect

creating a decision environment in which one option is clearly dominated

New cards
New cards

loss aversion

consumers are risk averse with respect to gains, but not losses

New cards
New cards

nudge is...

any aspect of the choice architecture that alters people's behavior in a predictable way without forbidding any option. must be easy and cheap to avoid

New cards
New cards

sludge is...

a process more difficult in order to produce an outcome that is not in a consumer's best interest (ex: cancelling subscriptions)

New cards