1/15
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Article 5
Everyone has the right to liberty and security, No one shall be deprived of his liberty save in the following cases and in accordance with a procedure prescribed by law.
What type of right is this
Qualified right, can be restricted in certain, limited circumstances
Origins
1215 Magna Carta “No free man shall be seized or imprisoned except by the lawful judgement of his equals or by the law of the land”
1679 Habeas Corpus Act guarantees a judge would review imprisonment.
Engel v Netherlands
Defined ‘deprivation of liberty’ - “individual liberty in a classic sense, is to say, the physical liberty of a person. It is not concerned with the broader ideas of liberty such as the sense of personal autonomy and the lack of social subordination.
5.1(a) Stafford v UK
Detention after conviction by a competent court
5.1(b) Insulate UK
Detention of individuals who breach court orders to fail to fulfil obligations prescribed by law
5.1(c) Hicks v MPC
Lawful detention of a person…. when necessary to prevent committing of an offence
5.1(d)
Allows for the detention of a minor for educational supervision or bringing him before a competent legal authority such as a court
5.1(e)
Lawful detention… for the prevention of spreading diseases, persons of unsound mind, alcoholics and drug addicts, or vagrants
5.1(f)
Lawful detention… to stop a person unlawfully entering a country or a person subject to deportation.
5.2 Christie v Leachinsky
Prompt reason for arrest/charge, case established this as common law and now is in PACE 1984
Fox, Campbell and Hartley v UK
Case provides clarity:
‘reasons’ - how far do we need to explain the reason for the arrest? Full reasons should be given asap, but not necessarily at arrest.
‘Prompt’ - what is the time frame? Margin of appreciation is very important, and depends on context, but should be asap.
General rule: a short period necessary for practical police procedures
5.3 Brogan v UK
Right to be brought promptly before judge, to bail, and trial in reasonable time
Three parts:
The right to be brough promptly before a judicial officer
The right to be tried within reasonable time
The right to release on bail (with conditions perhaps), except where detention in custody is justified.
5.4 P v Cheshire West & Chester
Right to legal proceedings to challenge lawfulness of detention/arrest
Applies to all types of detention (mental health)
General rule: detention should be reviewed periodically
5.5
Right to compensation for breach. Minimal amounts of compensation, more symbolic of showing ECtHR compensation is provided.
Restriction of liberty - situations
Control order and TPIMs
Prison and Remand
Care
Hospital treatment
Police powers: stop and search
Public order and crowd control and ‘kettling’ cases
Police powers: arrest and detention