Article 5

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/15

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 5:42 PM on 6/8/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

16 Terms

1
New cards

Article 5

Everyone has the right to liberty and security, No one shall be deprived of his liberty save in the following cases and in accordance with a procedure prescribed by law.

2
New cards

What type of right is this

Qualified right, can be restricted in certain, limited circumstances

3
New cards

Origins

  • 1215 Magna Carta “No free man shall be seized or imprisoned except by the lawful judgement of his equals or by the law of the land”

  • 1679 Habeas Corpus Act guarantees a judge would review imprisonment.

4
New cards

Engel v Netherlands

Defined ‘deprivation of liberty’ - “individual liberty in a classic sense, is to say, the physical liberty of a person. It is not concerned with the broader ideas of liberty such as the sense of personal autonomy and the lack of social subordination.

5
New cards

5.1(a) Stafford v UK

Detention after conviction by a competent court

6
New cards

5.1(b) Insulate UK

Detention of individuals who breach court orders to fail to fulfil obligations prescribed by law

7
New cards

5.1(c) Hicks v MPC

Lawful detention of a person…. when necessary to prevent committing of an offence

8
New cards

5.1(d)

Allows for the detention of a minor for educational supervision or bringing him before a competent legal authority such as a court

9
New cards

5.1(e)

Lawful detention… for the prevention of spreading diseases, persons of unsound mind, alcoholics and drug addicts, or vagrants

10
New cards

5.1(f)

Lawful detention… to stop a person unlawfully entering a country or a person subject to deportation.

11
New cards

5.2 Christie v Leachinsky

Prompt reason for arrest/charge, case established this as common law and now is in PACE 1984

12
New cards

Fox, Campbell and Hartley v UK

Case provides clarity:

  • ‘reasons’ - how far do we need to explain the reason for the arrest? Full reasons should be given asap, but not necessarily at arrest.

  • ‘Prompt’ - what is the time frame? Margin of appreciation is very important, and depends on context, but should be asap.

General rule: a short period necessary for practical police procedures

13
New cards

5.3 Brogan v UK

Right to be brought promptly before judge, to bail, and trial in reasonable time

Three parts:

  1. The right to be brough promptly before a judicial officer

  2. The right to be tried within reasonable time

  3. The right to release on bail (with conditions perhaps), except where detention in custody is justified.

14
New cards

5.4 P v Cheshire West & Chester

Right to legal proceedings to challenge lawfulness of detention/arrest

Applies to all types of detention (mental health)

General rule: detention should be reviewed periodically

15
New cards

5.5

Right to compensation for breach. Minimal amounts of compensation, more symbolic of showing ECtHR compensation is provided.

16
New cards

Restriction of liberty - situations

  • Control order and TPIMs

  • Prison and Remand

  • Care

  • Hospital treatment

  • Police powers: stop and search

  • Public order and crowd control and ‘kettling’ cases

  • Police powers: arrest and detention