explanations for forgetting- interference

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
0.0(0)
full-widthCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/16

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

17 Terms

1
New cards

What does forgetting mean ?

when learnt info can’t be retrieved

2
New cards

In the STM , why would forgetting occur ?

due to availability problem , either displaced or faded away

3
New cards

In the LTM , why would forgetting occur?

either decay (availability problem)

or because it’s hard to retrieve (accessibility problem )

or the information is confused (interference problem)

4
New cards

what is proactive interference ?

old memory interfering with a new mermory 

5
New cards

what is retro active memory ?

new memory interfering with old memory

6
New cards

when is interference more likely ?

if info is similar

7
New cards

give one study where interference as an explanation for forgetting was investigated ?

Henk Schmidt (2000)

8
New cards

give one study that investors the effect of similarity on interference ?

McGeoch and McDonald (1931)

9
New cards

In short , give evaluative points for interference on forgetting .

  • strength - research support

  • strength - practical applications 

  • weakness - supporting studies use artificial settings and tasks 

10
New cards

Describe Mcgeoch and McDonald’s procedure and findings ?

procedure

> studied retroactive interference by changing the amount of similarity between two sets of materials. 

> p’s learnt list of 10 words until 100% recall accuracy 

> 6 groups learnt different new lists 

  • synonyms 

  • antonyms 

  • words unrelated to the original list 

  • consonant syllables 

  • three digit numbers 

  • no new list - control condition 

findings 

> recal of original list was less accurate when new list was most similar to the original .

interference is strongest when memories are similar

<p>procedure </p><p>&gt; studied retroactive interference by changing the amount of similarity between two sets of materials.&nbsp;</p><p>&gt; p’s learnt list of 10 words until 100% recall accuracy&nbsp;</p><p>&gt; 6 groups learnt different new lists&nbsp;</p><ul><li><p>synonyms&nbsp;</p></li><li><p>antonyms&nbsp;</p></li><li><p>words unrelated to the original list&nbsp;</p></li><li><p>consonant syllables&nbsp;</p></li><li><p>three digit numbers&nbsp;</p></li><li><p>no new list - control condition&nbsp;</p></li></ul><p>findings&nbsp;</p><p>&gt; recal of original list was less accurate when new list was most similar to the original .</p><p>interference is strongest when memories are similar </p>
11
New cards
12
New cards
13
New cards
14
New cards
15
New cards
16
New cards
17
New cards