Module 5: Modeling Pollution Control

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
0.0(0)
full-widthCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/9

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

10 Terms

1
New cards

pollution damage functions

emission damages function: quantity of a residual and corresponding damage

ambient damage functions: concentrations in the ambient environment and the corresponding damages

2
New cards

marginal damage function

MD = S

additional damages from a one unti increase in emissions or ambient concentration

  • threshold: x-intercept, below a certain level MD are 0

implicit assumptions:

  • assuming a pollutant has a threshold has policy implications

  • reversibility: graph implies that damages decrease if quantity decreases, but this isn’t true for cumulative pollutants

3
New cards

intertemporal implications for pollution damage functions

a MD curve shows emission quantities and damages for a certain tie period

2 interpretations:

  1. noncumulative pollutant: all damages occur in same period as the emissions are released

  2. cumulative pollutant: assuming the damage function shows the total value people place on current and future damages 

4
New cards

aggregate MD

5
New cards

reasons MD differ for the same pollutant

  • differences in weather patterns between two areas (inversion, wind patterns)

  • differences in population (fewer people = lower MD)

  • differences in population vulnerability (older, at risk populations vs healthier)

  • time of day: higher MD when more people are outside

6
New cards

abatement costs

MAC = D

cost of reducing the quantity of emission residuals and lowering ambient concentrations

  • negative abatement cost means it is cost-saving in the long run (but mac curve only reflects abatement methods with positive marginal costs)

7
New cards

MAC

additional cost of a one unit decrease in emissions

MAC is 0 at uncontrolled level

aggregate MAC: add individual MAC horizontally

8
New cards

reasons the MAC curve could differ for the same abatement method

  • new technologies that are cheaper but achieve the same emissions reductions

  • different years

  • different sources abating (new plant vs older plant)

9
New cards

socially efficient level of emissions

MAC = MD

  • net benefits maximizes

10
New cards

enforcement costs

firms won’t abide by regulations, need enforcement

marginal enforcement costs added to MAC function