1/41
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
what are the 4 definitions for mental health
deviation from ideal mental health
deviation from social norms
statistical infrequency
failure to function adequately (FFA)
outline deviation from social/cultural norms
when an individual doesn’t follow generally accepted social standards or rules or expectations about what is acceptable behaviour. this may make people feel threatened or uncomfortable. social norms are often context dependant and can vary across cultures.
it is important to consider:
the degree to which the norm has been violated
the importance of that norm within society
evaluate deviation from social norms
strengths:
flexibility as a definition- acknowledges norms vary across cultures, time periods, age etc
weakness:
social norms can change over time- eg, being gay used to be highly frowned upon
cultural relativism- variation across cultures can lead to inappropriate diagnosis
can lead to people who display unique behaviour to be unfairly labelled as mentally ill
outline deviation from ideal mental health
according to Jahoda: a mental diagnosis can be given if a person does not meet the following criteria:
positive view of self
be focused on self-actualisation (reaching potential/ development)
function as autonomous (independent)
accurate view of reality
positive relationships and empathy to others
master of your own environment (can adapt to change)
can cope with stress
the more criteria a person fails to meet, the more mentally ill they are.
evaluate deviation from ideal mental health
strengths:
it is a comprehensive definition which clearly applies to a wide range of mental illnesses
can provide a clear checklist for psychologists to use for assessment
achievement of goals- can provide criteria
weakness:
too idealistic- very few people meet all the criteria at all times, so the majority of the population would be mentally ill according to this definition. this makes it hard to tell who really needs help.
cultural relativism- different cultures have different ideas about what is mentally healthy, this theory is based on western ideas.
explain FFA
a person who is failing to function adequately cannot cope with everyday tasks.
Rosenham and seligman (1989) proposed 7 signs of FFA:
unpredictability and loss of control
maladaptiveness (behaviours that are harmful to oneself or others)
personal distress- eg, anxiety
irrationality
observer discomfort
violation of moral and social standards
unconventionality
assessment of functioning scale (GAF)- a method of measuring how well individuals function in every day life. GAF scale rates functionality from 0 to 100. a higher score indicates better functioning.
evaluate the FFA:
strengths:
provides a clear, sensible threshold for when a person should seek help
measurable- allows a more reliable evaluation of and individuals ability to cope with daily life
behaviour is observable- can be detected by others
weakness:
some people have mental disorders but can cope with life- eg, psychopath serial killers like Harold Shipman the doctor who killed patients with drugs
everyday life varies across cultures
FFA may be due to certain circumstances- eg, a person may not get out of bed because they are grieving.
some people may choose abnormal routines
outline statistical infrequency
a person is mentally unwell if they exhibit a rare or unusual behaviour
eg- 1/100 people suffer with schizophrenia
evaluate statistical infrequency
strengths:
provides clear guidelines for identifying mental disorders as it provides a clear numerical cut off
weakness:
unusual chracteristics can be positive- eg, high IQ is desirable
some abnormal behaviours are not statistically rare like depression
deciding on a numerical cut off point is subjective
labelling may not be beneficial, even harmful- can lead to stigmas
phobias are…
anxiety disorders
what are the 3 symptom catergories for phobias
behavioural
emotional
cognitive
what are 3 behavioural characteristics
PANIC- can involve crying, running away, freezing, screaming
AVOIDANCE- tendency to avoid phobic stimulus
ENDURANCE- alternative to avoidance- person chooses to remain in the presence of phobia
what are 3 emotional characteristics
ANXIETY- prevents a person from relaxing, can be long term
FEAR- the immediate unpleasant response to a phobia
EMOTIONAL RESPONSE CAN BE UNREASONABLE- (to others)
what are 3 cognitive characteristics to phobias
SELECTIVE ATTENTION- hard to look away from it and focus on other things
IRRATIONAL BELIEFS- thoughts that can’t be easily explained and don’t have a basis in reality
COGNITIVE DISTORTIONS- perceptions may be unrealistic
outline the behavioural approach to EXPLAINING phobias
argues phobias are a learnt response
Howard Mowrer’s two-process model states that phobias are acquired (learnt in the first place) by classical conditioning and continue (are maintained) by operant conditioning
outline classical conditioning in relation to phobias
learning through association
phobia is caused when neutral stimulus (eg- dog) becomes associated with fear after a negative experience. neutral stimulus is now a conditioned stimulus which causes the conditioned response of fear
the CS is usually generalised to similar objects so in this case a person may fear all dogs
evaluate classical conditioning in developing phobias
in support= WATSON AND RAYNER (1920)
used CC to cause an 11- month old child to develop a phobia
at the beginning of study showed no fear of range of stimuli
paired a tame white rat (NS) with a loud bang (UCS) and the noise caused fear (CR)
eventually Albert was conditioned to associate the rat and similar stimuli with fear
evaluation=
unethical- cause long term harm - arguably this is unjustifiable
sample of one so limited generalisability
outline operant conditioning
the association between a phobic stimulus and fear should be gradually unlearnt over time as person is exposed to stimulus and learns it causes no harm. according to Mowerer’s model phobias tend to be long lasting because of OC and negative reinforcement.
he argues people avoid their phobias to avoid fear and anxiety. this is negative reinforcement as it encourages person to keep avoiding.
evaluate the behavioural approach
strengths=
effective treatments have been developed based on approach (SD and flooding). there is evidence that both are effective which supports the validity of the behaviouralist explanation
evidence that supports the ide phobias are learnt through negative experiences- Ad de jongh found 73% of ppl scared of the dentist had a negative experience
however, this doesn’t explain the development of phobias for ppl who cannot identify a negative experience
idea that phobias are learnt through CC is supported by controlled lab research (little albert study)
weaknesses=
the model cannot explain why some phobias are more common that others
we tend to acquire phobias of things that once threatened our survival from an evolutionary pov
suggesting the evolutionary theory also has a role in explaining phobias
the two-process model also ignore cognitive aspects of phobias as we know in many cases phobias involve irrational thinking. this suggests the cognitive theory also has a role in explaining phobias
what are 2 treatments for phobias
systematic desensitisation
flooding
outline SD
a form of counter conditioning when you replace the association with fear with association of feeling relaxed
three stages:
relaxation training
anxiety hierarchy
gradual exposure
two forms:
IN VIVO- in real life
IN VITRO- in the form of imagery
works due to reciprocal inhibition (two opposite emotions cannot happen at once)
evaluate SD
strengths=
evidence that it is effective- Gilroy
43 patients
spider phobias
checked in 3 months and 33 months and all were significantly less scared of spiders
suggests its effective short and long term
suitable for a wide range of patients- eg, autistic ppl, kids, ppl with learning disabilities
less traumatic then flooding so often a preferred choice- low attrition and refusal rates
weakness=
potential problems with IN VITRO method- relies on patients ability to realistically imagine scenario so limited effectiveness
outline flooding
immediately bombarding patient with phobia
prevents avoidance
fear response eventually becomes exhausted
causes ‘extinction’
evaluate flooding
strengths=
quicker and cost effective compared to SD
evidence for effectiveness (choy)
weakness=
can be traumatic- despite patients giving consent they may back out and not complete treatment
less effective for complex phobias like social phobias as they have a higher cognitive element which needs addressing like patterns of thinking
what are 3 behavioural characteristics of depression
activity levels:
reduced energy
struggle to complete work
struggle to get out of bed
struggle to relax (psychomotor agitation)
disruption to sleep/eating behaviour
aggression and self-harm
what are 3 emotional characteristics of depression
lowered mood
anger
lowered self-esteem
what are 3 cognitive characteristics of depression
poor concentration
unable to stay on task
hard to make easy decisions
attending to and dwelling on the negative
absolutist thinking
explain what is the cognitive approach to EXPLAINING depression and what are the 2 theories
argues some people are more vulnerable to depression due to the way they think
due to negative, irrational patterns of thinking
2 theories:
Beck’s cognitive theory
Ellis’ ABC model
outline BECK’S theory
COGNITIVE BIAS
selective thinking
absolutist thinking
catastrophising
over-generalisations
NEGATIVE SELF SCHEMA
deeply engrained negative set of beliefs about yourself
NEGATIVE TRAID
negative feelings about themselves
negative feelings about the future
negative feelings about the world
evaluate BECK’S theory
strengths=
there’s is evidence depression is linked to cognitive bias, negative triad and negative self schema- GRAZIOLI AND TERRY (2000)
it has led to the development of successful treatments- eg, CBT
weaknesses=
it ignores biological explanations like genes so it suggests this is not a complete explanation
outline ELLIS’ abc model
argues that depression is a result of negative and irrational beliefs triggered by activating events
A= activating event
B= beliefs (triggered by activating event)
musterbatory thinking- holding unrealistic demands on oneself or others
utopianism- the belief life is always meant to be fair
‘I-can’t-stand-it-itis’- when things don’t go smoothly it is a disaster
C= consequences (low mood or harmful behaviour)
evaluate ELLIS’ abc model
strengths=
application to therapy- has led to REBT and other successful therapies
weakness=
depression is not always caused by an activating event so it only applies to some cases
the cognitive approach downplays the role of situational factors causing depression
what is CBT: what does it believe and what does it aim to do
a form of talking therapy based on the idea negative and irrational patterns of thinking cause negative emotions and patterns of behaviour. these patterns of behaviour further reinforce the negative thinking leading to a vicious cycle
it aims to identify and challenge these irrational thoughts and negative patterns of thinking in order to reduce negative emotions and behaviours
outline becks CBT
generally time limited, ranging from 6-20 sessions
STAGES:
identify negative and irrational thoughts causing negative emotions or behaviours
the therapist helps identify common ‘thinking errors’, eg- catastrophising
challenging irrational thoughts through validity testing:
questioning and logical disputing
considering alternative, more likely explanations
fact-checking
homework tasks: thought records and diaries
BEHAVIOURAL ACTIVATION:
clients are also helped to understand the ‘vicious cycle of inactivity’ where depression leads to withdrawal which worsens mood and negative thoughts
BA aims to break this habit by encouraging clients to engage in activities like hobbies that are likely to bring some pleasure
is this feels overwhelming then the therapist will help break this down into manageable steps
outline ellis’ REBT- rational emotive behaviour therapy
based on ellis’ belief that it’s a persons beliefs about an event (rather than the event itself) which cause depression
REBT aims to identify, challenge and replace irrational beliefs leading to more positive consequences
REBT extends the ABC model to ABCDE where D stands for dispute (challenging irrational beliefs) and E stands for effect
ellis believes in a more confrontational approach to therapy where the client is challenged in debates- this may be through:
logical disputing- questioning the logic of the belief
empirical dispute- when the therapist asks for evidence
also involves homework
evaluate CBT
pros:
there is evidence for effectiveness
MARCH (2007)- compared the effects of CBT and anti-depressants and a combination of the two in 327 depressed teens
after 36 weeks both 81% of the anti-depressant and CBT groups improved
however, 86% of the CBT and anti-depressant group improved
this shows CBT is just as effective as ADs but having both together is most effective
CBT has no side effects so it is often the preferred choice
cons:
CBT may not work for severe cases because they are unable to concentrate or motivate themselves to participate in sessions- in this case they should take ADs so this suggests it is not always effective alone
success based largely off of client-therapist relationship, if patient does not form trusting bond with therapist it is possible it may not work
evidence it may only be effective short term:
ALI (2017)- followed 439 CBT patients every month
within 6 months, 42% relapsed
within 1 year, 53% relapsed
suggests follow up sessions may be needed for full long term effectiveness
outline the biological explanations for explaining OCD- genetic explanations
GENETIC EXPLANATIONS
genes are involved in individual vulnerability to OCD
Lewis observed that of his OCD patients, 37% had parents with OCD and 21% had siblings with OCD which suggests OCD runs in the family although what is probably passed on is genetic vulnerability rather than the certainty of OCD
diathesis-stress= genes caused by stress
candidate genes:
researchers have identified genes which create vulnerability to OCD
specific genes linked to OCD:
SERT gene= regulates serotonin, a mutated version of this gene increases serotonin reuptake which decreases serotonin
COMT gene= a mutated version of this gene means dopamine doesn’t get broken down leading to too much dopamine, causing compulsions
OCD is polygenic:
this means it isn’t caused by one single gene but variations of genes that come together to increase vulnerability
Taylor has analysed findings of previous studies and found evidence that up to 230 different genes are involved in OCD
there are different groups of genes which may cause OCD in one person compared to another
the term for this is aetiologically heterogeneous (the origins very from one person to another)
outline the biological explanations for explaining OCD- neural explanations
NEURAL EXPLANATIONS
the genes associated with OCD are likely to effect the levels of key neurotransmitters as well as structures of the brain
the role of serotonin:
serotonin helps regulate mood
neurotransmitters are responsible for relaying info from one neuron to another
if a person has low levels of serotonin they may experience low mood
some cases of OCD can be explained by reduction in the functioning of serotonin in the brain
neuroanatomical explanations:
overactive basal ganglia- the brain area involved in movement
leads to repetitive motor behaviours
suggested that people with OCD have disfunction in their OFC-thalamus circuit
the OFC (orbitofrontal cortex) is an area of the brain responsible for higher decision making- this detects worry
when a worry is detected a signal is sent to the thalamus which is then sent back to the OFC, creating a loop
the caudate nucleus helps regulate the circuit by supressing some of the ‘minor’ worries to prevent the circuit from becoming overactive
when someone has OCD it is likely that their caudate nucleus isn’t working very well
evaluate genetic explanations as part of the biological approach to explaining OCD
strengths:
research support
Nestadt reviewed previous twin studies and found that 68% of identical twins matched for an OCD diagnosis as opposed to 31% of non-identical twins
this suggests a genetic influence on OCD and increases validity of explanation
weakness:
environmental factors
environmental factors should also be considered alongside genetic factors
no twin study found concordance rates of 100% in identical twins even though they share 100% of their genes
this shows environmental factors play a role
cromer found that over half the OCD patients in their sample had a traumatic event in the past and that OCD was more severe in those who had trauma
this supports the diathesis-stress model, the idea that mental illness is a result of a genetic vulnerability triggered by stress
this suggests that genes alone cannot explain OCD
evaluate neural explanations as part of the biological approach to explaining OCD
strengths:
explanations for OCD supported by effective treatments
SSRIs increase serotonin activity in the synapse by blocking the reuptake of serotonin
these are effective in reducing OCD symptoms in 50% of sufferers which suggests OCD is linked to low levels of serotonin
HOWEVER> SSRIs are not effective in all patients suffering with OCD and not all OCD can be explained by low serotonin, furthermore- there is a time delay in taking drugs and any improvements in symptoms, yet the SSRIs boost serotonin levels within hours
clear evidence for neural explanations
(basal ganglia)
rates of OCD are higher than average among people suffering with parkinsons disease or tourettes, two disorders linked to abnormalities in the basal ganglia
(OFC)
Whitehead reviewed brain imaging research into OCD and found hyperactivity in the OFC was significantly more common in OCD patients compared to healthy controls
there is also evidence that overactivity reduces after treatment
we can therefore say there is objective, scientific evidence of brain abnormalities in OCD
outline drug therapy in treating OCD
drug therapy aims to increase or decrease levels of neurotransmitters in the brain to decrease/increase their activity
SSRIs:
serotonin is released by certain neurons in the brain
released by presynaptic neurons and travels across the synapse
the neurotransmitter chemically conveys the signal from the presynaptic neuron to the postsynaptic neuron and then it is reabsorbed by the presynaptic neuron where it is broken down and reused
SSRIs stop this process of reabsorption and reuptake from happening which increases levels of serotonin in the synapse and thus continues to stimulate the postsynaptic neuron
it can take up to 3 months for SSRIs to take effect
combining SSRIs with other treatments:
drugs are often used with CBT to treat OCD
the drugs enable people to engage more effectively with CBT as the drugs reduce emotional symptoms such as anxiety or depression
alternatives to SSRIs:
if SSRIs are not effective after 3 months of use the dose can be increased (eg- up to 60mg of fluoxetine from 20mg) or it can be combined with other drugs
tricyclics are sometimes used or SNRIs
anti-anxiety drugs:
benzodiazepines (BZs)- a range of anti-anxiety drugs
they work by increasing activity of the neurotransmitter GABA which is an inhibitory neurotransmitter which reduces neuron activity
increasing GABA slows down neuron activity further so BZs have a quietening influence on the brain which reduces anxiety and obsessive thoughts
evaluate the use of drug therapy for treating OCD
strengths:
evidence for its effectiveness
soomro conducted a meta analysis (review) of the research examining the effectiveness of SSRIs and found they were more effective than placebos in the treatment of OCD 100% of trials
this supports biological treatments of OCD, especially SSRIs
cost effective
anti-depressants and anti-anxiety drugs are cost effective in comparison to psychological treatments such as CBT
doctors may prefer the sue of drug therapy to talking therapy as it is cost effective for the NHS
weaknesses:
side effects:
drug therapy has side effects
SSRI side effects= indigestion, blurred vision
BZs side effects= dizziness, lack of coordination
BZs are well known for their withdrawal effects which makes them very addictive and BZs can have very negative long term effects such as cognitive impairments
passive treatment:
drugs dont require any active participation from patients
for many patients it is important that they are actively engaged in their treatment as it can give them a sense of control
this active involvement is missing from drug therapies