Causality in mental distress

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
0.0(0)
full-widthCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/11

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

12 Terms

1
New cards

What is the biopsychosocial model

  • Proposes that mental distress results from biological and psychosocial (relationships, family, wider society) factors.

  • Important to distinguish between circumstantial and social factors, and psychological processes.

2
New cards

What is meant by psychological processes

  • the process by which personal meaning is ascribed by events

  • supposedly the direct causal factor at the centre of distress 

3
New cards

Kinderman (2005) method 

  • Developed a questionnaire- 'the stress test' on BBC website

  • Sample – 32,872 respondents

  • Age range between 18 – 85 years

  • Demographic data compared to national data for England and Wales

  • More respondents were White, had slightly higher earnings and were better educated compared to the general population

  • Demographics: relationship status, income, education level

4
New cards

Kinderman (2005) factors 

  • Biological factors:

    • Direct family health problems

    • Cognitive tests: delayed matching to sample & affective go/no go task

  • Social factors:

    • Relationships with friends & family

    • Participation in social activities

  • Experience factors:

    • List of Threatening Experiences Questionnaire

    • Historical life events: ppts indicated if they believed they had been physically, sexually, or emotionally abused, or bullied at school.

5
New cards

Kinderman (2005) psychological processes

  • Coping style In relation to negative events/emotions

    • Rumination

    • Adaptive/problem solving

    • Dangerous activities

  • Attributional style

    • measures the degree to which persons generate internal, personal, or circumstantial causes for events

6
New cards

kinderman (2005) measures

  • Mental health- focus on negative emotions and dysfunction

  • Well-being- extent to which we can achieve our full potential

Often co-vary but distinct constructs

  • Anxiety and depression scales

  • BBC subjective well-being scale

  • structural equation modelling (SEM)- estimate which underlying constructs exist in the data

7
New cards

kinderman (2005) findings

  • Circumstantial factor was the strongest predictor of mental health problems and well-being

  • Followed by family history of mental health problems and social status (mental health) and social inclusion (well-being)

  • Response style and attribution style significantly mediated these relationships

    • Psychological processes can explain the effect

  • The way we process information and perceive the world determines the impact of biological, social and circumstantial factors on mental health and well-being

  • Overall, the relationship between life events and mental health problems is relatively weak. But, mediating effects of rumination

  • Overall, clear relationship between well-being and social activities. Adaptive coping was a 'protective factor'

8
New cards

What is positive psychology

Focuses on strengths and capabilities rather than dysfunction or illnesses.

9
New cards

Positive psychology interventions

  • aim to induce positive feelings, cognitions and behaviours

  • For example, interventions promote optimism, gratitude, social connectedness, etc.

  • Helps people cope with negative emotions and difficult situations

10
New cards

King (2001) best possible self method

  • Asks participants to focus on the best possible version of their future self after everything has gone as well as it possibly could.

  • Uses life domains related to well-being

  • e.g. romantic life, education, career, physical health, social life

11
New cards

(Emmons & McCullough, 2003) expressing gratitude method

  • Asks participants to reflect on feelings of gratitude.

  • For example, write (but not send) a letter to another person about times when they were grateful that that other person had done something for them.

12
New cards

Effectiveness of positive psychology interventions

(Carrillo et al., 2019)

  • BPS had moderate effects on wellbeing, optimism, and positive affect

  • Small effects on negative affect and depressive symptoms

  • Might be more effective for “older” participants (mid-thirties) and shorter interventions

Meta-analysis of 18 studies (Davis et al., 2016)

  • Gratitude interventions improved psychological wellbeing compared to control conditions, but only small effect.

  • But, might work through a placebo effect, i.e. the expectation that positive effects will follow from a psychological task.

  • Might not be effective in extreme crises, such as the COVID-19 lockdown (Tornquist et al.,  2023).