Professional Liability, Contract Formation, and Dispute Resolution in Law

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
0.0(0)
full-widthCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/119

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

120 Terms

1
New cards

Contractual Duties

Duty to perform services competently.

2
New cards

Fiduciary Duties

A duty imposed on a person who stands in a special relation of trust to another.

3
New cards

Tort Duties

Legal obligations arising from civil wrongs, leading to liability.

4
New cards

Fiduciary Duty

Requires the professional to act honestly, in good faith, and only in the best interests of the person to whom the duty is owed.

5
New cards

Breach of Fiduciary Duty

Occurs when a professional has a conflict of interest or prioritizes personal interests over the client's.

6
New cards

Negligent Misrepresentation

Involves providing careless or inaccurate information that someone reasonably relies on, resulting in financial loss.

7
New cards

Duty of Care

A legal obligation to ensure the safety or well-being of others.

8
New cards

Proximity

A close relationship where the professional must know the information will be used for a particular purpose.

9
New cards

Standard of Care

What a reasonably competent and experienced professional in the same field would do in similar circumstances.

10
New cards

Reasonably Competent Professional Test

Professionals must meet the level of skill, knowledge, and judgment expected within their industry.

11
New cards

Current Knowledge Standard

The standard is based on current, not outdated, professional practices.

12
New cards

Higher Standard for Specialists

A professional with specialized training must meet the standards of others in that specialty.

13
New cards

Inexperience Not an Excuse

Newer professionals are expected to meet the same standard as fully experienced ones.

14
New cards

Conflict of Interest

A situation where a fiduciary has competing interests that may undermine their duty to act in the best interests of a client.

15
New cards

Reasonable Reliance

The reliance on a statement must be reasonable for a claim of negligent misrepresentation.

16
New cards

Actual Financial Harm

There must be actual financial harm that resulted directly from the inaccurate statement.

17
New cards

Defenses in Negligent Misrepresentation

The plaintiff cannot prove one of the required elements or failed to mitigate their losses.

18
New cards

Example of Breach of Fiduciary Duty

If a professional secretly benefits from a transaction involving their client, they may be liable for breaching this duty.

19
New cards

Example of Negligent Misrepresentation

If an accountant gives incorrect financial advice without checking key information, and the client relies on that advice and suffers a loss.

20
New cards

Error in Judgment

A professional is not negligent if the decision they made is one that another reasonable professional could also have made, even if the outcome was poor.

21
New cards

Accepted Practice

If a professional follows generally accepted and approved practices in their field, this usually supports that they met the standard of care.

22
New cards

Codes of Conduct & Regulatory Standards

Professional rules, ethical codes, and regulatory guidelines are used to help determine what behavior was reasonable.

23
New cards

Causation and Reliance

Even if a professional falls below the standard of care, the client must show: They relied on the advice; The advice actually caused the harm.

24
New cards

Mediation

A neutral third party who is acceptable to all sides acts to assist the parties in reaching a settlement.

25
New cards

Arbitration

A dispute is referred to an arbitrator who adjudicates the matter and the parties agree to be bound by the arbitrator's decision.

26
New cards

Differences between Mediation and Arbitration

Mediation: Facilitator, a voluntary, collaborative process where the mediator helps the parties communicate, negotiate, and reach their own agreement. Arbitration: Decision Maker, a more formal, adjudicative process where the arbitrator makes a binding decision.

27
New cards

Benefits of Arbitration

Cheaper and faster than litigation, confidential, may help preserve future relationships, parties choose adjudicator/mediator.

28
New cards

Drawbacks of Arbitration

When there is a power imbalance between the parties, arbitration can be used to intimidate and abuse the weaker party; its impact on common law in specific cases; can be misused to defeat legal rights.

29
New cards

Definition of a Contract

A contract is a set of promises enforceable by law or an agreement that is legally enforceable. Created when the offer is accepted by the offeree.

30
New cards

Legally Enforceable

This means that if one party fails to live up to the promises in the agreement, the other party can bring an action to have a court enforce the agreement.

31
New cards

Three Essential Elements of a Contract

Consensus (offer and acceptance), intention to create legal relations, consideration is exchanged by parties.

32
New cards

Offer

Offer is a description of a promise one party is willing to make, subject to the agreement of the other party.

33
New cards

Offeror and Offeree

Offeror- the person who offers to enter into a contract; Offeree - the person who receives an offer.

34
New cards

Invitation to Treat

An invitation to the public to begin the bargaining process, examples are: advertisements, goods on display with a requested price.

35
New cards

Difference between Invitation to Treat and Offer

An invitation to treat is different from an offer because it allows the purchaser to define the terms of the agreement and then the owner gets to decide if they agree with their offer.

36
New cards

Nature of Invitation to Treat

An invitation to treat is an indication that a person is willing to negotiate or receive offers, but it is not an offer and cannot be accepted to form a contract.

37
New cards

Carlill v. Carbolic Smoke Ball

A case where the advertisement was a unilateral offer to the whole world.

38
New cards

Consideration

Buying/using the smoke ball was good consideration.

39
New cards

Intention to Create Legal Relations

Carbolic's deposit of £1000 showed this intention.

40
New cards

Communication of Offer

Offers must be communicated to the offeree (verbally, written, or through conduct).

41
New cards

Clarity of Offer

Offers must be clear and unambiguous.

42
New cards

Cross-Offers

Two offers do NOT make a contract.

43
New cards

Offer + Acceptance

Results in a valid contract.

44
New cards

Offer + Offer

Results in no contract.

45
New cards

Unsolicited Goods/Services

Consumers must explicitly accept in writing for a contract to form.

46
New cards

Standard Form Contract

A 'take it or leave it' contract prepared entirely by the offeror.

47
New cards

Characteristics of Standard Form Contract

Pre-drafted by one party, terms favour the offeror, offeree has no bargaining power.

48
New cards

Harsh or Unusual Terms

Must be specifically drawn to the customer's attention.

49
New cards

Termination of Offer

An offer can terminate by lapse, revocation, rejection, or counteroffer.

50
New cards

Lapse

Occurs when the stated time for acceptance expires or a reasonable time passes.

51
New cards

Revocation

Offeror may revoke anytime before acceptance.

52
New cards

Rejection

If the offeree rejects the offer, it dies.

53
New cards

Counter-offer

Rejects the original offer and replaces it with a new one.

54
New cards

Option (Irrevocable Offer)

A separate contract where the offeree gives consideration for the offeror to keep the offer open.

55
New cards

Acceptance by Promise

Offeree accepts by promising to do something.

56
New cards

Bilateral Contracts

Both parties become bound immediately.

57
New cards

Acceptance by Performance

Offeree accepts by doing the act requested.

58
New cards

Unilateral Contracts

Offer calls for performance, not a promise.

59
New cards

Example of Unilateral Contract

Reward → 'If you return my dog, I pay $500.'

60
New cards

Difference between Unilateral and Bilateral Contracts

Bilateral: Exchange of promises; Unilateral: Acceptance occurs only by completing the act.

61
New cards

Communication of Acceptance

Can be communicated verbally, in writing, by conduct, or electronically.

62
New cards

Instantaneous Communication

Effective when received by the offeror.

63
New cards

Non-instantaneous Communication

Acceptance effective when sent under traditional common law postal acceptance rule.

64
New cards

Electronic Transactions Act

Communication is effective when capable of being retrieved by the recipient.

65
New cards

Sufficient Consideration

Must have some value in the eyes of the law; even a small amount counts.

66
New cards

Example of Sufficient Consideration

A peppercorn can be sufficient consideration.

67
New cards

Not Adequate Consideration

Courts do not evaluate whether the parties made a fair or equal bargain.

68
New cards

Gratuitous Promise

A promise made without consideration—nothing is given in return.

69
New cards

Examples of Gratuitous Promise

A charitable pledge; Promising to give someone a car for free.

70
New cards

Past Consideration

NOT valid consideration; cannot form the basis of a contract.

71
New cards

Example of Past Consideration

If I mow your lawn voluntarily, and afterward you promise to pay me $50 → NOT enforceable.

72
New cards

Intent to Form Legal Relations

Determined by a two-step analysis: presumption and rebuttal.

73
New cards

Presumption in Commercial Context

YES, parties intended to create legal relations.

74
New cards

Presumption in Family Context

NO, parties did not intend to be legally bound.

75
New cards

Rebutting the Presumption

Can be rebutted with facts or evidence.

76
New cards

Carlill v. Carbolic Smoke Ball Co.

The company showed intent by depositing money 'to show sincerity.'

77
New cards

Old Law (Traditional Common Law)

Any modification to an existing contract required fresh consideration.

78
New cards

New Law (Rosas v. Toca, 2018 BCCA)

The court held that: 'In the absence of duress, unconscionability, or other policy concerns, contract modifications made without consideration should still be enforceable.'

79
New cards

Implications of Rosas v. Toca

Contract changes do NOT require fresh consideration in BC.

80
New cards

Request for goods or services

Creates an implied obligation to pay a reasonable price.

81
New cards

Quantum meruit

Payment for the value of services performed.

82
New cards

Example of request for services

You ask someone to paint your office without discussing price → you must pay a reasonable amount.

83
New cards

Key difference between request and gratuitous promise

Request → obligation to pay; No request + later promise → gratuitous and unenforceable.

84
New cards

Effect of a seal

A seal eliminates the need for consideration.

85
New cards

Effects of a seal

Makes a gratuitous promise enforceable and shows clear intention to be legally bound.

86
New cards

Requirements for a seal

Must be placed on the document at the time of signing.

87
New cards

Social context at the hockey game

Presumption of no intention to create legal relations.

88
New cards

Scenario 2 - Julie gives James her car for $0

This is a gratuitous promise → not enforceable, unless made under seal, or promissory estoppel applies.

89
New cards

Contracts made by a minor

Not binding on the minor but are binding on the other party.

90
New cards

Minor's repudiation

Minor may repudiate (refuse to be bound by an agreement) except for necessaries and beneficial contracts of service.

91
New cards

Necessaries

Includes food, clothing, lodging, medical attention, legal advice, and transportation.

92
New cards

Beneficial contracts of service

Refers to employment contracts that are binding.

93
New cards

Ratification of contracts by minors

If not repudiated in a timely manner after reaching the age of majority, they may become liable for the contract.

94
New cards

Contract unenforceability due to incapacity

The contract is voidable at the option of the incapacitated.

95
New cards

Proving incapacity

Person seeking to rely on incapacity must prove incapacity and that the other party knew or ought to have known of the incapacity.

96
New cards

Prompt repudiation of contract

Must repudiate the contract promptly.

97
New cards

Difficulty in ascertaining capacity

Practically, capacity is sometimes very difficult to ascertain.

98
New cards

Illegal by reason of a statute

Contract is not enforceable because it violates, directly/indirectly, legislation.

99
New cards

Illegal by reason of public policy

Contracts contemplating commission of a tort are not enforceable. Contracts prejudicial or contrary to public interest are not enforceable.

100
New cards

Illegal by reason of the common law

Same as public policy.