1/100
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
organizational change
refers to the action by
which a company or business alters major
components of its organization, such as culture,
technology, infrastructure, etc
evolutionary change
continual process of
upgrading or improving processes
revolutionary change
drastic changes
- process of altering organizations to be more adaptive
and congruent with their business environment
organizational development
change process
through which employees formulate the change that’s
required and implement it
organizational development
a system-planned
intervention designed to change an organization’s
structure and/or processes to achieve a higher level
of functioning
organizational transformation
intended to move
your organization from where it is currently to a
desired future state
- allows the business to act strategically, staying ahead
of events and being the agent of change
transformational change
seeks to create
significant, fundamental shifts in how an organization
operates and organizes itself
transformational change
involves introducing new strategies, processes,
systems, and structures that shift the way the company
operates
incremental change
introduces small, but
meaningful changes to an organization’s systems,
processes, and structures
developmental change
seeks to build on existing
processes, structures, and capabilities of an
organization in order to bring about meaningful
improvements
remedial change
– involves making corrections or
improvements to existing systems, processes and
structures in order to bring about more efficient and
effective operations
process and system change
– making adjustment to
existing processes and systems in order to improve
efficiency and effectiveness
- introduction of new technologies, systems, and tools
people and culture change
focuses on
transforming organization’s culture, values, and
behaviors in ord
structural change
alters the way an organization is
structured in order to improve efficiency and
effectiveness
merger and aquisition change
involves merging
or acquisition of two or more business
de-merger change
involves splitting of an
organization into two or more separate entities
downsizing
reducing the size of an organization
relocation change
moving of an organization or
parts of it to a new location
rebranding change
making modifications to
organization’s brand or public image, in order to
create a more compelling and attractive image
sacred cow hunt
is an organization-wide
attempt to get rid of practices that serve no
useful purpose
paper cow
unnecessary paperwork
meeting cow
number and lengths of meetings
speed cow
unnecessary deadlines
stage 1: denial
Employees deny that
any changes will actually take place,
try to convince themselves that the
old way is working, and create
reasons why the proposed changes
will never work
stage 2: defense
They become
defensive and try to justify their
positions and ways of doing things
stage 3: discarding
Employees begin
to realize not only that the
organization is going to change, but
that the employees are going to have
to change as well
stage 4: adaptation
Employees test
the new system, learn how it
functions, and begin to make
adjustments in the way they perform
stage 5: internalization
Employees
have become immersed in the new
culture and are comfortable with the
new system, and have accepted their
new coworkers and work environment
Lewin’s change model
change as a matter of
modifying those forces that are acting to keep things
stable
Lewin’s change model
Any behavioral situation is characterized both by
forces operating to maintain stability or equilibrium
and by forces pushing for change
intervention
the program or initiative suggested or
implemented by the change agent
change agent
initiates the change, usually external
to the organization, people who enjoy change and
often make changes just for the sake of it
client
recepient of the change effort
change resistant
individuals who prefer to keep
things the way they are
change analysts
not afraid to change or make
changes but want to make changes only if the
changes will improve the organization
receptive changers
people who probably will not
instigate change but are willing to change
reluctant changers
not instigate or welcome
change, but they will change if necessary
unfreezing
forces that maintains the status quo are broken down,
and the system is opened up for change
- started by pointing out behaviors and outcomes
prevalent in the organization that are not consistent
with its goals and objectives
unfreezing
the organization must
convince employees and other stakeholders
that the current state of affairs is
unacceptable and that change is necessary
moving
the organization takes steps
to move the organization to the desired state
refreezing
the organization develops
ways to keep the new changes in place, such
as formalizing new policy, and rewarding
employees for behaving in a manner
consistent with the new change
change resisters
hate change, are
scared by it, and will do anything they can
to keep change from occurring
action research model
social problems that
needed to be addressed from both methodological
and social perspectives
sensemaking
hat employees do to gain a
better understanding of their workplace
perrow’s model
examined information technology,
which refers to all aspects of jobs
kotter’s change model
proposed an eight-stage
model that essentially broke down Lewin’s 3 steps into
subcomponents based on common mistak
invisible hand theory (adam smith)
individuals
are driven by self-interest and rationally will make
decisions that lead to positive benefits for the whole
economy
rational choice theory
individuals use
rational calculations to make rational choices
and achieve outcomes that are aligned with their own personal objectives
Vroom-Yetton model
provide a flowchart that can
tell a leader the process to go through when making
a decision
autocratic I strategy
leaders use the
available information to decide without
consulting their subordinates
autocratic II strategy
leaders obtain
necessary observation from their
subordinates and then make their own
decisions
consultative I strategy
share the problem
on an individual basis with some or all of their
subordinates and then make their own
decision
consultative II strategy
share the problems
with their subordinates as a group and then
make the decision
Group I strategy
the leader shares the
problem with the group and lets the group
reach a solution
human process intervention
related to
interpersonal relations, groups, and organizational
dynamics
process consultation
creation of a
relationship that permits the client to
perceive, understand, and act on the process
events that occur in his/her internal and
external environment in order to improve the
situation as defined by the client
process interventions
help the group
become more aware of its own internal
dynamics and develop better ways of
interacting, thereby increasing its ability to
solve its own problems and improve future
performance
content interventions
help the group
improve its effectiveness by addressing
substantive issues related to its mission or
deliverables
structural interventions
create a more
effective structure that supports better
group functioning and performance
team building
enhance team
cohesion, communication,
problem-solving abilities, role
clarity, and intergroup relations
confrontation meeting
designed
to quickly diagnose and address
serious problems within an
organizational unit or team
microcosm groups
a small,
heterogeneous group, formed to
address a specific organizational
problem or represent diverse
perspectives
large-group interventions
involve bringing together a
significant portion, or even the
entire population, of an
organization or a large system
technocultural interventions
targeted toward
structural and technological issues such as
organizational design, work redesign, and employee
engagement
parallel structures
temporary or
permanent structures (like
committees, task forces, or quality
circles) designed to address specific
problems or foster innovation that the
regular, more bureaucratic structure
might not be well-suited for
total quality management
is a
comprehensive, organization-wide
approach to continuous
improvement that emphasizes
meeting customer requirements and
empowering employees to take
responsibility for quality at every level
high involvement organizations
represent the most extensive and
integrated application of employee
involvement principles throughout an
entire organization
survey feedback
involves systematic collection
data, widely used intervention strategy
team building
develop teams or to enhance the
effectiveness of the existing teams
outdoor experiential training
makes use of
outdoors and entails various physical and mental
exercises
total quality management
Focuses on employee involvement in the control
of quality in organizations
gainsharing
involves paying employees a bonus
based on improvements in productivity
technostructural interventions
focus on the
technology and structure of organizations
functional organizational design
most
basic, structured according to the various
functions of the employees, groups employees to
various departments based on their expertise;
create job specialist and overly focused on their
own department and are of specialization
product-based organizational structure
organized based on
their product output, allows the managers of a
particular division to focus exclusively on that
division, creating greater commitment and
cohesion within the division; operates as a
separate entity
matrix structure
combined function and
products structure
reengineering (business process redesign)
involves fundamental rethinking and redesign of
business processes to improve critical
performance as measures by cost, quality,
service, and speed
positive psychology
scientific study of the
strengths and virtues of individuals and
institutions rather than their weaknesses and
impairments
appreciative industry
engages employees by
focusing on positive messages, the best of what
employees have to offer, and the affirmation of
past and present strengths and successes
discovery
determine the strengths (research)
dream
information gathered from discovery is
analyzed and elaborated upon to arrive at a
vision statement or focused intent
(brainstorming)
design
designing innovative ways to identify
where the organization should be going
(planning)
destiny
the design is maintained or sustained
in this stage (execution)
organizational tranformation
any
intervention primarily directed toward creating a
new vision for an organization and changing its
beliefs, purpose, and mission
culture change
alteration of a pattern of
beliefs, values, norms, and expectations shared
by organizational members
knowledge management
organizations enhance
their operations through attempts to generate,
transform, disseminate, and use their knowledge
organizational change
process of altering
organizations to be more adaptive and congruent
with their business environmen
t-groups
sensitivity training, use of unstructured
group interaction to help workers gain insight into
their motivations and their behavior patterns in
dealing with others
organizational structure
arrangement of
positions in an organization and the authority and
responsibility relationships among them
traditional organization structure
have formally defined roles for their
members, very rule driven, and are stable and
resistant to change
bureacracy
a well-defined
authority hierarchy with strict rules for
governing work behavior
line-staff organizational structure
composed of one group of
employees who achieve the goals of
the organization (line) and another
group who support the line (staff)
team organization
workers have
defined jobs, not narrowly specialized
positions, common to traditionally
structured organizations, collaborate
among workers, and share skills and
resources
project task force
a temporary,
nontraditional organization of
members from different departments
or positions within a traditional
structure who are assembled to
complete a specific job or project
matrix organization
structured
both by product and function
simultaneously
mechanistic structure
characterized by high
specialization, rigid departmentalization, a clear chain
of command, narrow spans of control, high
formalization, and centralized decision-making
organic structure
characterized by low
specialization, loose departmentalization,
cross-functional teams, wide spans of control, low
formalization, and decentralized decision-making
decentralized structure
decision-making authority
is distributed to lower levels of management and
employees throughout the organization
centralized structure
decision-making authority is
concentrated at the top level of the organization
network structure
a decentralized and flexible
structure that leverages external partners,
contractors, and alliances to perform various
functions