1/54
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
What are the Four Laws of Logic?
Law of identity
Law of excluded middle
Law of non-contradiction
Law of sufficient reason
What is the Law of Identity?
everything that is, exists
What is the Law of Excluded Middle?
Everything either is or is not
Law of Non-Contradiction
Something Can be and not be at the same time
Law of Sufficient Reason
everything that is, has a sufficient reason why it is
What is an Argument?
a claim used to persuade or convince people regarding the truth about an issue
What do arguments aim to do?
Convince or persuade
What are the three parts of an argument?
Issue: the problem
Premise: evidence
Conclusion: use evidence for the issue
What is the first step of the Critical thinking exercise
Ask basic questions
What is the second step of the Critical thinking exercise
Question basic assumptions
What is the third step of the Critical thinking exercise
Be aware of your mental processes
What is the fourth step of the Critical thinking exercise
Try reversing things
What is the fifth step of the Critical thinking exercise
Evaluate the existing evidence
What is Deductive Reasoning?
a fundamental form of logical inference that begins with a general theory narrowed down by information and reasoning to reach a specific conclusion
What is inductive Reasoning?
proceeds in the reverse direction with specific observations and infers a general conclusion from them
What is the argumentative theory of reasoning?
A theory developed by French cognitive social scientists to explain how rationality becomes a weapon.
What are observations?
perceptions of the environment gathered by our five senses
What is Stereotyping?
generalizing characteristics to a group of people
What is Bair?
giving unfair attention to one side over another
What is discrimination?
acting on the bias
What does bias in attitude lead to?
Prejudice
What does Pre mean
before
What does judge mean?
Decide
What are the three steps to finding a common fallacies?
Identify the wrong premises (the bad proofs)
Identify the wrong alternative outcomes
Identify logical disconnects between the premises and conclusion
What is affirming the consequent?
If P, then Q. Q. Therefore, P
i. If you were careless in driving, then the car would be dented
ii. The car is dented.
iii. You are a careless driver.
What is Denying the Antecedent
If P, then Q. If not P, then not Q
i. If Mario is a professional golfer, then he is a good sportsman
ii. But Mario is not a professional golfer
iii. He is not a good sportsman
What does Disjunct mean?
a term that excludes another term
What is Affirming a disjunct?
A or B. A. Therefore, not B.
i. Celia would love either a puppy or a kitten
ii. Celia loved the puppy she got
iii. She would not love the kitten.
What does Conjunct mean?
a term joined to another as being in the same class
What is Denying a Conjunct
Form 1: Not both q and p. Not q. Therefore p.
Form 2: Not both q and p. Not p. Therefore q.
i. Anthony is not both Catholic and atheist.
ii. Anthony is not Catholic.
iii. Therefore he is an atheist.
AF 1: Not both q and p. Therefore, not p.
AF 2: Not both q and p. Therefore, not q.
i. Anthony is not both Catholic and atheist.
ii. Anthony is a Catholic.
iii. Therefore he is not an atheist.
What is The fallacy of the undistributed middle?
This fallacy is a syllogistic fallacy because it is the form of a categorical syllogism.
All A is B.
All B is C.
Therefore all A is C.
i. All insects are animals.
ii. All mammals are animals.
iii. Therefore all mammals are insects.
Hasty Generalization
A fallacy in which a faulty conclusion is reached because of inadequate evidence.
Appeal to (false) Authority
must be true if an expert says it is
Appeal to emotions
using emotions to manipulate
Appeal to ignorance
an argument that reasons with something are either true or false based on a lack of evidence
Black swan fallacy
ignoring evidence that runs counter to their beliefs
Begging the Question
- when a premise assumes the conclusion is true instead of proving it
Black-Or-White Fallacy
- forcing a choice between only two alternatives
Middle Ground
- this is choosing the compromise between two arguments just because it is somewhere in the middle of the two extremes
False Cause
- the logical connection between the premises in imaginary
Red Herring
- The arguer throws out an irrelevant issue to distract and confuse the listener
Slippery Slope
- one small step could lead to increasingly harmful situations
False Analogy
- draws a false comparison between two things
Sunk Cost Fallacy(Concorde fallacy)
- a person's behavior due to investing time, effort, or money in something
Appeal to the People
- listeners' desire to be associated with a large group of people or people of a particular type as the basis for persuasion
Straw Man
- gives the illusion of refuting the proposition being made when the argument is replaced with a different one and attacks that instead
Appeal to Force
- the arguer threatens to harm
Fallacy Fallacy
- relies on the justification that since the claim was argued poorly, the claim itself is wrong
What is confirmation bias?
tends to favor ideas that confirm our existing opinions and the information we already accept as truth
First Impression Bias
- information processing is limited because of the information people are initially exposed to
The Dunning-Kruger Effect
- people have an overly favorable opinion of their abilities
Fundamental Attribution Error (Fae)
- social error involving an overestimation of an actor's personality while at the same time underestimating the situational factors when trying to explain the cause
Decline Bias (Declinism)
- tends to view the past as overly positive and the present or future in an extremely negative light
Diagnostic Bias
- occurs when one's perception, prejudice, or subjective judgment affects one's diagnosis
What are the pieces of the Diagnostic Bias?
Anchoring
Availability
Confirmation
Framing
Premature closure