Modern Exam 2 - AAS/AFS (Ch. 9)

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
0.0(0)
full-widthCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/36

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

37 Terms

1
New cards

Flame and electrothermal atomizers

The two most common atomizers for AAS/AFS.

2
New cards

Inductively coupled plasma (ICP)

The most common atomizer for AES.

3
New cards

Flame atomizers

Nebulization, desolvation, volatilization, dissociation

4
New cards

Nebulization

Droplet formation from collisions with gas oxidant and liquid.

5
New cards

Desolvation

Solvent evaporation to produce a finely divided solid molecular aerosol.

6
New cards

Volatilization

A flame produces gaseous molecules.

7
New cards

Dissociation, ionization, and excitation

Depends on the fuel and oxidant.

8
New cards

Interzonal region

The most widely used region of a flame atomizer because free atoms of the analyte are prevalent.

9
New cards

Monochromators can sample the radiation from a relatively small region of the flame so optimization occurs by adjusting the position of the flame with respect to the entrance slit.

Flame Temperature and Flame Absorption Profiles

10
New cards

laminar flow burner

Instrument for flame atomization

11
New cards

Most reproducible of all liquid-sample introduction methods developed for AAS and AFS. Has lower sensitivity and sample efficiency.

Properties of the Flame

12
New cards

Electrothermal Atomizer Furnace Steps

Drying (usually just above 110 deg. C.), Ashing (up to 1000 deg. C), Atomization (Up to 2000-3000 deg. C), and Cleanout (quick ramp up to 3500 deg. C or so).

13
New cards

Small sample size (1 μL or 10−10 g to 10−13 g) and a parts per trillion (ppt) concentration limit of detection.

Advantages of Electrothermal Atomizers

14
New cards

Irreproducibility (relative standard deviation is 5-10%), takes minutes per sample, and the analytical range is relatively narrow (<2 orders of magnitude).

Limitations of Electrothermal Atomizers

15
New cards

Plasma

An electrically conducting gaseous mixture containing a significant concentration of cations and electrons (net charge is zero).

16
New cards

2-3 times hotter than the hottest flame, more complete atomization, fewer chemical interferences, chemically inert environment, and a uniform temperature cross section.

Advantages of ICP

17
New cards

Requires a narrow source bandwidth relative to the width of an absorption line or band. Using ordinary spectrometers result in a nonlinear response, poor sensitivity, and small signals.

Beer's Law Limitation in AAS

18
New cards

Line Sources

Are used to mitigate the limitations of Beer's Law in AAS, but a separate source lamp is needed for each element.

19
New cards

Hallow-Cathode Lamps (HCL)

The most common line sources for AAS, utilizes sputtering and redeposition

20
New cards

Sputtering

Gaseous cations (Ne+ or Ar+) are generated to produce sufficient kinetic energy to dislodge the cathode surface creating an atomic cloud.

21
New cards

Redeposition

Atoms in the atomic cloud diffuse back to the cathode surfaces or to the glass walls.

22
New cards

Higher voltages lead to greater intensities but also an increase in Doppler broadening of the emission lines. Higher currents can lead to self-absorption.

HCL Tradeoff Considerations

23
New cards

The intensity of the source fluctuates at a constant frequency to eliminate residual effects and interferences from flame emission.

Source Modulation

24
New cards

Single-Beam Instruments

Modulate via the power source and can account for some effects of the flame on the signal.

25
New cards

Double-Beam Instruments

Modulate via an optical chopper and do not account for intensity loss and/scattering due to the flame.

26
New cards

Spectral interference

Arises when absorption or emission of interfering species overlaps with the analyte absorption or emission that resolution by the monochromator becomes impossible.

27
New cards

Chemical interferences

Result from reactions that occur during atomization that alter the absorption characteristics of the analyte.

28
New cards

Continuum-Source Correction

An interference correction method where absorbance is measured with a broadband source and an HCL, and the difference is taken.

29
New cards

Zeeman Effect Correction

An interference correction method that uses polarized light and a magnetic field; it is useful for electrothermal atomizers.

30
New cards

Source Self-Absorption/Self-Reversal Correction

An interference correction method based on the self-absorption behavior of radiation from an HCL at high and low currents.

31
New cards

Releasing agents

Cations that react preferentially with interfering anions to eliminate chemical interferences.

32
New cards

Protective agents

Prevent chemical interference by forming stable but volatile species with the analyte.

33
New cards

Flame AA Detection Limits

1-20 ppb, more reproducible with ~1% RSD.

34
New cards

Electrothermal AA Detection Limits

1-20 ppt ((10−10 to 10−13 g), more sensitive, but slower and with a higher RSD of 5-10%.

35
New cards

Atomic Fluorescence Spectroscopy (AFS)

Has few advantages when compared to AAS/AES and is expensive and specialized.

36
New cards

Electroless discharge lamp (EDL)

The source for AFS, which is about twice as intense as an HCL.

37
New cards

Nondispersive instruments (AFS)

Are lower cost, adaptable, high throughput, and allow for simultaneous collection