cognitive motor dual task interference

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
0.0(0)
full-widthCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/29

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

30 Terms

1
New cards

attention

information processing capacity of an individual

concepts: has a limit (capacity); performing a task requires given portion of capacity

2
New cards

if 2 tasks are perforemd together that require more than available capacity of attention

task performance on either or both tasks deteriorates

3
New cards

cognitive-motor interference

possible outcome when a cognitive task and motor task are performed simultaneously

4
New cards

cognitive-motor interference in healthy adults

limited by ability to process info (attentional capacity)

system requires switching attention to most task-relevant info

5
New cards

cognitive-motor interference in neuro disease

capacity available for attention to task may be decreased

executive function deficits may=incorrect alocation of attention

single task may require incr attention

combining task=compromise 1 or both tasks

6
New cards

where would you see deficits with cognitive-motor interference?

reaction time (preparation-initiation) and/or movement sequence (initiation-execution-termination)

7
New cards

attention must be able to be appropriately switched and allocated

balance, coordination, UE manip for tasks of walking, talking, step down curb, avoiding people, carrying things, texting, etc.

prioritization of dangers of oncoming traffic, bumping into things/ppl, falling, wrong turn, etc.

stimuli can be numerous and conflicting

attention types: divided, alternating, selective

8
New cards

how does pathology affect cognitive-motor interference?

capacity of executive function: attention not allocated properly

capacity of speed of processing available for attention to task

9
New cards

dual tasking

2 tasks that can be performed independently, measured separately, have distinct goals

10
New cards

complexity

related to # of task components and attentional demands

11
New cards

novelty

related to performer experience

12
New cards

low novelty low complexity task

task is easier

ex. walking on a level surface

13
New cards

high novelty low complexity task

task is of moderate difficulty

ex. walking on an icy surface

14
New cards

low novelty high complexity task

task is of moderate difficulty

ex. walking on a level surface while carrying a glass of water

15
New cards

high novelty high complexity task

task is harder

ex. walking on an icy surface while carrying a glass of water

16
New cards

motor-motor tasks

two motor tasks combined in a dual task

17
New cards

cognitive-motor tasks

a motor and a cognitive task combined in a dual task

18
New cards

dual cognitive-motor task (1)/novelty of cognition

knowt flashcard image
19
New cards

dual cognitive-motor (2)/novelty of motor

knowt flashcard image
20
New cards

measures of dual task performance

y axis: cognitive performance

x axis: motor performance

perform each single task, then dual task

horiz distance btwn single task perform and dual perform=motor interference

vert distance btwn single task perform and dual perform=cog interference

area between single task lines and dual task lines=automaticity

smaller area between cog single/cog dueal or motor single/motor dual=attention allocation

21
New cards

task specific interference: motor dual ttask effect (DTE)

[(motor DT-motor ST)/motor ST]*100%

+=facilitation

-=interference

22
New cards

task specific interference: cognitive dual task effect

[(cog DT-cog ST)/cog ST]*100%

+=facilitation

-=interference

23
New cards

task prioritization: motor priority trade off

+motor DTE

-cog DTE

24
New cards

task prioritization: cognitive priority trade off

-motor DTE

+cognitive DTE

25
New cards

task prioritization: mutual interference

-motor DTE

-cognitive DTE

26
New cards

task prioritization: mutual facilitation

+motor DTE

+cognitive DTE

27
New cards

modified attention allocation index

motor DTE-cognitive DTE

+motor priority

0 no priority

-cognitive priority

28
New cards

calculating DTE

use negative multiplier (± 100%) if inverse/opposite relationship (ex. incr time=worse perform)

negative values always indicate decline in performance

29
New cards

DTE considerations

cognitive task must be continuous

cognitive task msut be completed using same method but diff specific responses (like different numbers to count down from)

do not provide number until ready to begin motor task

30
New cards

task prioritzation

mutual interference: both -

motor priority trade off: motor +, cog -

cog priority trade off: motor -, cog +

mutual facilitation: botth +